Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Persister: optimized InventoryCollection definitions #271

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2018

Conversation

slemrmartin
Copy link
Contributor

@slemrmartin slemrmartin commented Jun 21, 2018

Optimizations and simplification of InventoryCollection definitions

Issue: ManageIQ/manageiq#17396

What is possible is moved to core

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jun 21, 2018

Checked commit slemrmartin@46da4f3 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
3 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

@slemrmartin slemrmartin changed the title [WIP] Persister: optimized InventoryCollection definitions Persister: optimized InventoryCollection definitions Jun 25, 2018
@slemrmartin
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @agrare

@miq-bot miq-bot removed the wip label Jun 25, 2018
@agrare agrare self-assigned this Jul 11, 2018
@agrare agrare closed this Jul 11, 2018
@agrare agrare reopened this Jul 11, 2018
@agrare
Copy link
Member

agrare commented Jul 11, 2018

Looks like this is failing on the same spec that master is currently failing on

@slemrmartin slemrmartin reopened this Jul 12, 2018
@agrare agrare closed this Jul 12, 2018
@agrare agrare reopened this Jul 12, 2018
@agrare
Copy link
Member

agrare commented Jul 12, 2018

Should be fixed by #273

@agrare agrare merged commit 46da4f3 into ManageIQ:master Jul 12, 2018
agrare added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2018
Persister: optimized InventoryCollection definitions
@agrare agrare added this to the Sprint 90 Ending Jul 16, 2018 milestone Jul 12, 2018
@slemrmartin slemrmartin deleted the inventory-collection-builder branch July 19, 2018 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants