-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 896
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add orchestration stacks to RBAC #18308
Merged
+35
−11
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems templates / generic objects tend to be
ancestor_ids
,and core objects tend to be
descendant_ids
.I expected this one to be
descendant_ids
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, can we remove this?
a. I think this array is only for tenancy and not cloud tenancy
b. Having a
nil
in here will not do anythingAlso, can you verify that we are not calling into
accessible_tenant_ids_strategy
forOrchestrationStack
?I'm pretty sure we don't need that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let me make clear those things...
It works togethers. We need find ids from tenants and then find their equivalents in cloud tenants.
in filterer:
it goes to scope_to_cloud_tenant
then to the TenancyCommonMixin#tenant_id_clause
and then in TenancyCommonMixin#tenant_id_clause it calls tenant_id_clause_format but from CloudTenancyMixin
Yes I verified it when I was looking for previous answers.
accessible_tenant_ids_strategy
is called also fromOrchestrationStack
and it is called here@kbrock does it make sense now ? If you other questions let me know!
thanks!