-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
G34 stepper locks #20091
G34 stepper locks #20091
Conversation
… into bugfix-2.0.x
… into bugfix-2.0.x
… into bugfix-2.0.x
… into bugfix-2.0.x
Can you detail how it changes |
I'm having a little trouble understanding how to use it. I see that I would use something like I suppose I see two different workflows people might want with this:
|
I see, there is an Lock only one motor (might be inverted?) Lock all but one motor
Maybe it would make sense to expand L to allow both enabling and disabling all motors. |
ba51bda
to
8f8df02
Compare
I tweaked it so that you can send |
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Scott Lahteine <[email protected]>
Allow locking/unlocking individual steppers when multiple z steppers exist for manual movements.