Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust wait_for_cooling slope #4250

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2016

Conversation

AnHardt
Copy link
Member

@AnHardt AnHardt commented Jul 9, 2016

Adjust wait_for_cooling slope
and drop mintemp for cooling.

See
#4169 (comment)

@thinkyhead
Copy link
Member

thinkyhead commented Jul 10, 2016

Overall it looks good. Do we need to increase one of our vars here to long as you mentioned?

if (old_temp - temp < 1.0) break;
next_cool_check_ms = now + 20000;
if (old_temp - temp < MIN_COOLING_SLOPE_DEG_BED) break;
next_cool_check_ms = now + 1000UL * MIN_COOLING_SLOPE_TIME_BED;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thinkyhead
No, not a variable. Just a constant. For some reason 1000UL * MIN_COOLING_SLOPE_TIME_BED is done in int if we don't us UL. Worked great for times up to 32 seconds, but not for 60.

@AnHardt AnHardt force-pushed the wait-for-cooling-slope branch 3 times, most recently from 1afc055 to e92e58d Compare July 11, 2016 01:33
Adjust wait_for_cooling slope
and drop mintemp for cooling.

See
MarlinFirmware#4169 (comment)
@thinkyhead thinkyhead merged commit 4a100c6 into MarlinFirmware:RCBugFix Jul 11, 2016
@AnHardt AnHardt deleted the wait-for-cooling-slope branch July 11, 2016 10:02
@jbrazio jbrazio modified the milestone: 1.1.0 Jul 18, 2016
@thinkyhead thinkyhead mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2016
drewmoseley pushed a commit to drewmoseley/Marlin that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants