Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I think glide.sh is down #1077

Open
shivamMg opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 8 comments
Open

I think glide.sh is down #1077

shivamMg opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 8 comments

Comments

@shivamMg
Copy link

https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/glide.sh

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 17, 2021

yeah its down

@VenkatTeja
Copy link

Yes. Any alternative address to install glide?
can't access glide.sh/get

@paulwitt
Copy link

Impacted by this as well. Is there a mirror?

@ankitrgadiya
Copy link

The source code for glide.sh is open-source as well. An alternate link can be the raw link for the get file in the repository.

Repository: https://github.com/Masterminds/glide.sh/blob/master/get
Link: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Masterminds/glide.sh/master/get

Groxx added a commit to cadence-workflow/cadence that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2021
[glide.sh is down](Masterminds/glide#1077), breaking our pipelines, and glide is abandonware anyway.
It's well past time to migrate off.

I don't believe `tcheck` is actually used for anything, nor is it mentioned in any documentation... but it _does_ work, it'll tell you if e.g. cadence-frontend is running and could be useful for scripting.  Though in that case a relevant `cadence ...` command would be as good or better anyway.

It may be worth removing this entirely?  It's not particularly large nor pulling in any new dependencies, but it may just be old cruft.
@paulwitt
Copy link

Looks like this guy's fork of that repo has fixed the script to work also: https://github.com/chenxin0723/glide.sh

longquanzheng pushed a commit to cadence-workflow/cadence that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
[glide.sh is down](Masterminds/glide#1077), breaking our pipelines, and glide is abandonware anyway.
It's well past time to migrate off.

I don't believe `tcheck` is actually used for anything, nor is it mentioned in any documentation... but it _does_ work, it'll tell you if e.g. cadence-frontend is running and could be useful for scripting.  Though in that case a relevant `cadence ...` command would be as good or better anyway.

It may be worth removing this entirely?  It's not particularly large nor pulling in any new dependencies, but it may just be old cruft.
@d0nt-panic
Copy link

Link to the raw file will not help by itself because there is another request to glide.sh inside https://github.com/Masterminds/glide.sh/blob/master/get#L119

I made this dirty hack to download explicit version of glide:

curl 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Masterminds/glide.sh/master/get' -o /tmp/get_glide
sed -i 's+get TAG https://glide.sh/version+TAG="v0.13.3"+g' /tmp/get_glide
sh /tmp/get_glide

@ericmillin
Copy link

This works for me:

curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/chenxin0723/glide.sh/master/get | sh

yycptt pushed a commit to cadence-workflow/cadence that referenced this issue Mar 29, 2021
[glide.sh is down](Masterminds/glide#1077), breaking our pipelines, and glide is abandonware anyway.
It's well past time to migrate off.

I don't believe `tcheck` is actually used for anything, nor is it mentioned in any documentation... but it _does_ work, it'll tell you if e.g. cadence-frontend is running and could be useful for scripting.  Though in that case a relevant `cadence ...` command would be as good or better anyway.

It may be worth removing this entirely?  It's not particularly large nor pulling in any new dependencies, but it may just be old cruft.
yux0 pushed a commit to yux0/cadence that referenced this issue May 4, 2021
…3999)

[glide.sh is down](Masterminds/glide#1077), breaking our pipelines, and glide is abandonware anyway.
It's well past time to migrate off.

I don't believe `tcheck` is actually used for anything, nor is it mentioned in any documentation... but it _does_ work, it'll tell you if e.g. cadence-frontend is running and could be useful for scripting.  Though in that case a relevant `cadence ...` command would be as good or better anyway.

It may be worth removing this entirely?  It's not particularly large nor pulling in any new dependencies, but it may just be old cruft.
@erayerdin
Copy link

Domain seems to be parked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants