-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
X.509: Fix bug in SAN parsing and enhance negative testing #2839
Closed
hanno-becker
wants to merge
10
commits into
Mbed-TLS:development
from
hanno-becker:x509_san_parsing_testing-dev
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
82a1fe5
X.509: Remove CRT policy parsing test 'bool len missing'
7b8330a
X.509: Move negative tests for CertificatePolicy parsing
c15ff98
X.509: Adapt negative parsing test for no data in CrtPolicy ext
6dfa665
X.509: Add numerous negative parsing tests for CertificatePolicy ext
37f750a
Fix X.509 SAN parsing
305bc31
X.509: Improve negative testing for SubjectAltName parsing
1bfd979
Adapt ChangeLog
4962822
X.509: Improve negative testing for SubjectAltName parsing
63cf8aa
X.509: Remove red'n bounds checks and zeroiz'n in OtherName parsing
f21de55
X.509: Add length consistency checks to x509_get_other_name()
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although technically this works, since it is assigning by value
tmp_buf
tocur->buf
, I don't like that there is an assignment of a structure defined in the stack, without a proper memory copying.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's deliberate - why do you prefer a
memcpy()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you are counting for the struct to be copied by value, it wouldn't do a deep-copy(neither does
memcpy
actually), and this is not future proof.In addition, in a matter of style, I always prefer using to copy data from non primitive types.