Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Provide documentation of expose APIs to enable handling of type coerc…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…ion at UNION plan construction. (apache#12142)

* chore(12105): enable union type-coercion by two approaches, using newly pub interfaces

* chore(12105): update documentation to delineate btwn the interfaces involved in type coercion

* chore((12105): update union() logical plan construction docs, to address type coercion
  • Loading branch information
wiedld authored Aug 26, 2024
1 parent 0c75ddd commit 533ddcb
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 28 additions and 6 deletions.
12 changes: 11 additions & 1 deletion datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1331,7 +1331,17 @@ pub fn validate_unique_names<'a>(
})
}

/// Union two logical plans.
/// Union two [`LogicalPlan`]s.
///
/// Constructs the UNION plan, but does not perform type-coercion. Therefore the
/// subtree expressions will not be properly typed until the optimizer pass.
///
/// If a properly typed UNION plan is needed, refer to [`TypeCoercionRewriter::coerce_union`]
/// or alternatively, merge the union input schema using [`coerce_union_schema`] and
/// apply the expression rewrite with [`coerce_plan_expr_for_schema`].
///
/// [`TypeCoercionRewriter::coerce_union`]: https://docs.rs/datafusion-optimizer/latest/datafusion_optimizer/analyzer/type_coercion/struct.TypeCoercionRewriter.html#method.coerce_union
/// [`coerce_union_schema`]: https://docs.rs/datafusion-optimizer/latest/datafusion_optimizer/analyzer/type_coercion/fn.coerce_union_schema.html
pub fn union(left_plan: LogicalPlan, right_plan: LogicalPlan) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
// Temporarily use the schema from the left input and later rely on the analyzer to
// coerce the two schemas into a common one.
Expand Down
22 changes: 17 additions & 5 deletions datafusion/optimizer/src/analyzer/type_coercion.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ use datafusion_expr::{
Projection, ScalarUDF, Union, WindowFrame, WindowFrameBound, WindowFrameUnits,
};

/// Performs type coercion by determining the schema
/// and performing the expression rewrites.
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct TypeCoercion {}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -128,16 +130,23 @@ fn analyze_internal(
.map_data(|plan| plan.recompute_schema())
}

pub(crate) struct TypeCoercionRewriter<'a> {
/// Rewrite expressions to apply type coercion.
pub struct TypeCoercionRewriter<'a> {
pub(crate) schema: &'a DFSchema,
}

impl<'a> TypeCoercionRewriter<'a> {
/// Create a new [`TypeCoercionRewriter`] with a provided schema
/// representing both the inputs and output of the [`LogicalPlan`] node.
fn new(schema: &'a DFSchema) -> Self {
Self { schema }
}

fn coerce_plan(&mut self, plan: LogicalPlan) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
/// Coerce the [`LogicalPlan`].
///
/// Refer to [`TypeCoercionRewriter::coerce_join`] and [`TypeCoercionRewriter::coerce_union`]
/// for type-coercion approach.
pub fn coerce_plan(&mut self, plan: LogicalPlan) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
match plan {
LogicalPlan::Join(join) => self.coerce_join(join),
LogicalPlan::Union(union) => Self::coerce_union(union),
Expand All @@ -153,7 +162,7 @@ impl<'a> TypeCoercionRewriter<'a> {
///
/// For example, on_exprs like `t1.a = t2.b AND t1.x = t2.y` will be stored
/// as a list of `(t1.a, t2.b), (t1.x, t2.y)`
fn coerce_join(&mut self, mut join: Join) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
pub fn coerce_join(&mut self, mut join: Join) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
join.on = join
.on
.into_iter()
Expand All @@ -176,7 +185,7 @@ impl<'a> TypeCoercionRewriter<'a> {

/// Coerce the union’s inputs to a common schema compatible with all inputs.
/// This occurs after wildcard expansion and the coercion of the input expressions.
fn coerce_union(union_plan: Union) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
pub fn coerce_union(union_plan: Union) -> Result<LogicalPlan> {
let union_schema = Arc::new(coerce_union_schema(&union_plan.inputs)?);
let new_inputs = union_plan
.inputs
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -809,7 +818,10 @@ fn coerce_case_expression(case: Case, schema: &DFSchema) -> Result<Case> {
}

/// Get a common schema that is compatible with all inputs of UNION.
fn coerce_union_schema(inputs: &[Arc<LogicalPlan>]) -> Result<DFSchema> {
///
/// This method presumes that the wildcard expansion is unneeded, or has already
/// been applied.
pub fn coerce_union_schema(inputs: &[Arc<LogicalPlan>]) -> Result<DFSchema> {
let base_schema = inputs[0].schema();
let mut union_datatypes = base_schema
.fields()
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 533ddcb

Please sign in to comment.