Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relax dimension constraints on field objects #374

Closed
bekozi opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

relax dimension constraints on field objects #374

bekozi opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bekozi
Copy link
Contributor

bekozi commented Aug 5, 2015

who: @bekozi

Field objects are required to be five dimensional. This constraint should be relaxed and allow arbitrary labeled dimensions. It may make sense to use a library like xray for the backend when this transition is made. The calculations package will require the most significant changes when this is implemented.

@bekozi bekozi added this to the v1.4.0 milestone Apr 20, 2016
@bekozi bekozi self-assigned this Apr 20, 2016
@bekozi bekozi modified the milestones: v2.0.0, v1.4.0 Mar 16, 2017
bekozi added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2017
- Substantial rewrite of drivers, data interface, calculations, and
  operations to support MPI parallelization
- Removes required dimensions and dimension ordering #374
- Any extra dimensions are now subset provided they share the name of
  subset dimensions #143
- Default coordinate system switched to spherical #380
- Removes selection geometry ordering constraint (unclear why it was
  present in the first place) #383
- Aggregation is now in parallel. Additional speed-ups should use
  ESMF for spatial aggregations (conservative regridding). #197
- Relaxed dimension constraints for variables means all dimension types
  are handled #211
@bekozi bekozi closed this as completed May 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant