Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unhelpful error message if asking for DO_RIDGING without Icepack linked in #183

Closed
kshedstrom opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@kshedstrom
Copy link
Contributor

If asking for DO_RIDGING without Icepack, one gets:

FATAL from PE    14: nilyr or nslyr mismatch with Icepack

It would be nice to having it instead say that DO_RIDGING is not available without linking in Icepack/columnphysics.

@MJHarrison-GFDL
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for pointing this out @kshedstrom . It is an accurate, but useless error message. I will send a PR with a more useful message informing that actual Icepack code needs to be included in the compilation of the model, rather than the stub code in config_src/external

marshallward pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2022
New parameter RIDGE_AREA_UNDERFLOW is introduced in order to avoid the occurrence of undetectably small fractional area and negative ice volume following ridging adjustments from Icepack. The default is 0.0, which does not introduce changes in existing runs. A reasonable value would be 10^-26 which would correspond to an Angstrom-scale ice patch within a km-scale grid cell. This addresses #178 and #183
@Hallberg-NOAA
Copy link
Member

This issue was addressed by #184, and can now be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants