change follow-up model to practice and opporunity

[kapil1garg]

Related to this issue for OS. The model for SOAP follow-ups right now feels like “sending messages around”, not the idea of “here’s what we’re doing to practice at X”

The idea of having practice / issue objects is clearer if it's actually linking to a follow-up practice rather than that a message around a venue

[kapil1garg]

Interactionly, can think about the issue from the SOAP note w.r.t. to the practice (such as a LIP structure). For example, a mentor could say that when a student is signing up for a LIP, think about the issue and how the LIP (and what representation) could help the student.

However, also good to be weary of wanting to have the mentor write all the context for how to LIP should be done (too much work during the SIG meeting).

[kapil1garg]

there's an important conceptual distinction to make: for an issue, mentors can suggest to students a practice and the opportunity in which to practice

these two should be separately encoded, and should start with the practice being encoded first (rather than thinking about where the practice should be done