Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: vite 小程序端的 chunks 拆分 #16140

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

feat: vite 小程序端的 chunks 拆分 #16140

merged 9 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

ZEJIA-LIU
Copy link
Contributor

这个 PR 做了什么? (简要描述所做更改)
vite 小程序端的 chunks 拆分

这个 PR 是什么类型? (至少选择一个)

  • 错误修复(Bugfix) issue: fix #
  • 新功能(Feature)
  • 代码重构(Refactor)
  • TypeScript 类型定义修改(Typings)
  • 文档修改(Docs)
  • 代码风格更新(Code style update)
  • 其他,请描述(Other, please describe):

这个 PR 涉及以下平台:

  • 所有小程序
  • 微信小程序
  • 支付宝小程序
  • 百度小程序
  • 字节跳动小程序
  • QQ 轻应用
  • 京东小程序
  • 快应用平台(QuickApp)
  • Web 平台(H5)
  • 移动端(React-Native)
  • 鸿蒙(harmony)

@ZEJIA-LIU ZEJIA-LIU requested a review from koppthe July 23, 2024 08:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.05%. Comparing base (f22ddc4) to head (67022c4).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16140   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.05%   61.05%           
=======================================
  Files         445      445           
  Lines       22939    22939           
  Branches     4996     4959   -37     
=======================================
  Hits        14005    14005           
- Misses       7966     7993   +27     
+ Partials      968      941   -27     
Flag Coverage Δ
taro-cli 73.67% <ø> (ø)
taro-runtime 59.83% <ø> (ø)
taro-web 52.76% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
packages/taro-helper/src/utils.ts 22.19% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants