-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 774
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add --only-output-json-directory
Argo Workflow option
#1947
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
--only-yaml
argo-workflows cli option.--only-json-directory
argo-workflows cli option.
--only-json-directory
argo-workflows cli option.--only-cron-workflow-template-only
, --only-event-sources-only
, and --only-workflow-template-only
cli options
--only-cron-workflow-template-only
, --only-event-sources-only
, and --only-workflow-template-only
cli options--only-cron-workflow-only
, --only-event-sources-only
, and --only-workflow-template-only
cli options
--only-cron-workflow-only
, --only-event-sources-only
, and --only-workflow-template-only
cli options--only-cron-workflow-json
, --only-event-sources-json
, and --only-workflow-template-json
cli options
--only-cron-workflow-json
, --only-event-sources-json
, and --only-workflow-template-json
cli options--only-cron-workflow-json
, --only-event-sources-json
, and --only-workflow-template-json
Argo Workflow options
@savingoyal any chance you can take another look? Thanks in advance! |
@savingoyal friendly ping.. Would I be able to get another review? |
@@ -3754,8 +3806,7 @@ class ArgoWorkflowTrigger(object): | |||
# https://github.com/argoproj/argo-events/blob/master/api/sensor.md#argoproj.io/v1alpha1.ArgoWorkflowTrigger | |||
|
|||
def __init__(self): | |||
tree = lambda: defaultdict(tree) | |||
self.payload = tree() | |||
self.payload = _tree() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this change seems unrelated to the PR. can you consider pulling this out as a different PR or skipping it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, let me revert
@@ -2731,7 +2745,7 @@ def _compile_sensor(self): | |||
) | |||
|
|||
# Useful to paint the UI | |||
trigger_annotations = { | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@trhodeos we have impending plans to move away from one sensor -> one workflow template
mapping (to save resource costs) to one sensor -> multiple workflow templates
which will break the expectations in this PR for --only-event-sensor-json
. can you help us with the timelines you are shooting for this PR? happy to chat over zoom if that's helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
depending on your use case, an immediate workaround could also be to override argo_client.py through the extensions such that rather than submitting the CRDs to kubernetes, it just prints them out to stderr.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but regardless this change is in the right direction. can you help us with details on how you have tested this change? we should be able to test this PR ourselves some point next week.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One potential solution is to only add a CLI arg --output-json-directory-only
and just push all json blobs to that directory. This would essentially allow us to not be tied to the number of resources we generate (as in, adding more sensors is not a problem).
I like the argo_client.py idea, though we'd still like to push directly to argo while we migrate off of using metaflow directly. Still possible, but may require a bit more thinking.
For context: we are trying to use metaflow to generate the resources, spit them out to a gitops repo which has ArgoCD hooked up to it, for better staging of deploys.
As for testing, I'll test locally tomorrow!
This supports outputting _all_ k8s templates into stdout (rather than just the workflowtemplate one via --only-json). Fixes 1940, 1730
--only-cron-workflow-json
, --only-event-sources-json
, and --only-workflow-template-json
Argo Workflow options--only-output-json-directory
Argo Workflow option
This supports outputting all k8s templates into stdout (rather than just the workflowtemplate one via --only-json).
Fixes #1940, #1730