Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

casync: fix cross compilation by passing the correct sphinx #192169

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2022

Conversation

NickCao
Copy link
Member

@NickCao NickCao commented Sep 21, 2022

Description of changes
Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux (cross)
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Sep 21, 2022
@@ -3247,7 +3247,7 @@ with pkgs;
keystone = callPackage ../development/libraries/keystone { };

casync = callPackage ../applications/networking/sync/casync {
sphinx = python3Packages.sphinx;
sphinx = buildPackages.python3Packages.sphinx;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sphinx is used in derivation as native build input. To avoid following issue, the recommended way is to use buildPackages:
#49526
I did not build or test this packages, but can you explain why you had to change this line?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The splicing magic fails when parameters are explicitly passed to callPackage, thus it's required to prefix buildPackages to get the right sphinx.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are absolutely right. When I first read the diff, I thought you removed buildPackages. I missinterpreted the diff, for some reason.

@ck3d ck3d merged commit e14f9fb into NixOS:master Sep 23, 2022
@NickCao NickCao deleted the casync-cross branch September 23, 2022 05:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants