eslint_d: repackage using buildNpmPackage

[ehllie]

Description of changes

Repackages nodePackages.eslint_d to be built using buildNpmPackage as per the suggestion in #229475

Things done

Moved eslint_d to pkgs/development/tools, removed it from node-packages.json and included it in aliases.nix.

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[ehllie]

I've noticed the aliases have a comment next to them indicating when they were added. Are they supposed to be the time the change gets merged into nixpkgs, in which case I can't tell make that comment when creating the PR, or just when the PR gets submitted?

[SuperSandro2000]

The date is the time of writing. It is not important that it is exact to the date as it only gets used later to know if the alias entry is 10 months or 10 days old. With the next stable cycle it should be converted to a throw and with the one after that be removed.