tetrio-plus: split into seperate derivation

[huantianad]

Description of changes

This allows the tetrio-plus package to be cached, so users don't have to compile tpsecore themselves.

@wackbyte let me know if this is something we even want to do.

Questions:

• Do we want to switch tetrio-desktop's version to just be 9? Upstream seems to only be using integer versions, and it would save us some lib.versions.major calls.
• Is it OK to reference tetrio-desktop's src and version like this in general?

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[wackbyte]

seems like there's a precedent for this with Vencord and OpenASAR, so LGTM!

Do we want to switch tetrio-desktop's version to just be 9? Upstream seems to only be using integer versions, and it would save us some lib.versions.major calls.

sounds good to me!

Is it OK to reference tetrio-desktop's src and version like this in general?

I think so.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/1954

[huantianad]

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

Edit: oooh that's how it works, that makes a lot of sense... that's kinda cool

[nixpkgs-merge-bot]

@huantianad merge not permitted (#305350):
pr author is not in restricted authors list, in the list are: r-ryantm

[nixpkgs-merge-bot]

@huantianad merge not permitted (#305350):
pr author is not in restricted authors list, in the list are: r-ryantm

[SuperSandro2000]

Why move rev?

[huantianad]

Used in changelog, wanted to reduce duplication, can revert.

[huantianad]

I've split the 'tetrio-plus: split into seperate derivation' commit into two commits to hopefully make the changes a bit clearer; let me know if some of the commits make sense to be squashed.