Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

corretto{11,17,21}: {11.0.23.9.1,17.0.11.9.1,21.0.3.9.1} -> {11.0.24.… #342262

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

rollf
Copy link
Contributor

@rollf rollf commented Sep 16, 2024

…8.1,17.0.12.7.1,21.0.4.7.1}

nixfmt has changed a lot. Other than that, there is only version bump and a comment update.

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Sep 16, 2024
@rollf rollf marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2024 06:17
@rollf rollf requested a review from chayleaf September 20, 2024 06:19
@chayleaf
Copy link
Contributor

can you split nixfmt changes into a separate commit to make it easier to review?

@rollf
Copy link
Contributor Author

rollf commented Sep 21, 2024

@chayleaf I have separated the changes into 2 commits.

@chayleaf
Copy link
Contributor

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 342262 run on x86_64-linux 1

6 packages built:
  • corretto11
  • corretto11.debug
  • corretto17
  • corretto17.debug
  • corretto21
  • corretto21.debug

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Sep 25, 2024
@rollf rollf mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2024
13 tasks
@emilazy
Copy link
Member

emilazy commented Sep 26, 2024

Please fix the merge conflict.

@rollf
Copy link
Contributor Author

rollf commented Sep 26, 2024

Yes, I'm on it. This came by #341407 . I am currently compiling locally.

@wegank wegank removed the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label Sep 26, 2024
@rollf
Copy link
Contributor Author

rollf commented Sep 27, 2024

Okay, this PR is green again.

@rollf
Copy link
Contributor Author

rollf commented Oct 4, 2024

@emilazy Would you be able to merge this?

@emilazy
Copy link
Member

emilazy commented Oct 4, 2024

Sorry for forgetting about this! LGTM.

@emilazy emilazy merged commit ae36f39 into NixOS:master Oct 4, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants