Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deck: 1.40.2 -> 1.40.3 #345095

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024
Merged

deck: 1.40.2 -> 1.40.3 #345095

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024

Conversation

Bot-wxt1221
Copy link
Member

@Bot-wxt1221 Bot-wxt1221 commented Sep 28, 2024

Description of changes

Fix build https://hydra.nixos.org/build/274111751/nixlog/1

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@liyangau
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR. A couple changes that I was not aware of like the default formatter seems to be changed to the new rfc nixfmt. I remember failing the formatting test not long ago in a separate PR.

Anyway, should we worry about the failed OfBorg passthru test? I can build it successfully locally on my X86_64-linux machine.

@Bot-wxt1221
Copy link
Member Author

@ofborg build

1 similar comment
@Bot-wxt1221
Copy link
Member Author

@ofborg build

@Bot-wxt1221
Copy link
Member Author

@ofborg build deck

@liyangau
Copy link
Member

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

@nixpkgs-merge-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@liyangau merge not permitted (#305350):
pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix is not in pkgs/by-name/

@liyangau
Copy link
Member

ok. I guess I will wait for the next PR to use the merge bot.

By the way, I see two ways of using buildGo123Module, either use it directly on package.nix or pass argument to callPackage.

Both works, which one is preferred?

@Bot-wxt1221
Copy link
Member Author

@liyangau Currently only update bot's PR can be merged by nixpkgs-merge-bot. define it in all-packages.nix is better I think because people can override it by buildGoModule = xxx instead of buildGo123Module = xxx. It will be helpful if we update it.

@wegank wegank added 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in the package labels Sep 30, 2024
@h7x4 h7x4 merged commit 1648fec into NixOS:master Oct 5, 2024
32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in the package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants