Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aliases.nix: throw aliases before 2022 #349431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 00:32
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Oct 18, 2024
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4710

Copy link
Member

@pbsds pbsds left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

verified the diff with

diff \
  <(cat 349431.patch | grep -E '^-  ' | cut -c2- | sd '  (.*) = (.*); #.*' '  $1 = throw "'"'"'$1'"'"' has been renamed to/replaced by '"'"'$2'"'"'"; # Converted to throw 2024-10-17' ) \
  <(cat 349431.patch | grep -E '^\+  ' | cut -c2- )

paperless-ng = paperless-ngx; # Added 2022-04-11
parity = throw "parity, renamed to openethereum, has been terminated by upstream"; # Added 2020-08-01
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the only differing line, which LGTM

@pbsds pbsds merged commit 7e2eb46 into NixOS:master Oct 19, 2024
27 checks passed
@drupol
Copy link
Contributor

drupol commented Oct 22, 2024

Oops, this has broken pkgs.vscode-extensions.rust-lang.rust-analyzer :(

@pbsds
Copy link
Member

pbsds commented Oct 22, 2024

How? It builds fine for me

@drupol
Copy link
Contributor

drupol commented Oct 22, 2024

I had to remove it to successfully build my profile, commit at drupol/nixos-x260@f4a3a90

@pbsds
Copy link
Member

pbsds commented Oct 22, 2024

nix flake check github:drupol/nixos-x260/91e50cb8add8f2e3eff7134904979c0852e9d68a runs into #349783

@adisbladis
Copy link
Member

Why? We still maintain the same number of attributes, they're just much more unfriendly now.

@pbsds
Copy link
Member

pbsds commented Nov 1, 2024

Would you rather we skip straight to dropping them?

@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

Would you rather we skip straight to dropping them?

Bad idea imho. It would defeat the purpose of aliases.nix file.

Let's wait one or two releases to drop the aliases.

@patryk4815
Copy link
Contributor

image
who will fix unicorn after dropping alias?

@pbsds
Copy link
Member

pbsds commented Nov 13, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants