Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17.0][MIG] base_exception: Migration to 17.0 #2809

Merged
merged 66 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

lef-adhoc
Copy link

No description provided.

mourad-ehm and others added 30 commits January 16, 2024 18:08
…lled by constraint methods

'detect_exception' can be called on an empty recordset.
- Show menu only to Exception Rule Managers
- Use sequence and active widgets on tree view
- Updated form to use sheet
[IMP] Computed exception descriptions field, to display better help messages

[IMP] Exceptions shouldn't be copied
By default exceptions can be ignored by the click of a button.
Users begin human they will just click that button what ever
the internal rules.

So this PR adds the option to set specific exceptions as blocking.

When exceptions are detected if one of them is blocking, the user
will not be able to ignore them.
use odoo-test-helper
split test so one test do one thing
<footer>
<button
name="action_confirm"
string="_Close"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think "_Close" is a typo.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's ready

string="Help"
invisible="exception_type != 'by_py_code'"
>
<group>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the view is broken, we should remove the <group>
image

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's ready

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

2 similar comments
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@john-herholz-dt
Copy link

@sebastienbeau , Can you merge this? I have several PRs depending on this. Thank you!

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration base_exception

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 17.0 milestone Feb 2, 2024
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The migration issue (#2752) has not been updated to reference the current pull request because a previous pull request (#2761) is not closed.
Perhaps you should check that there is no duplicate work.
CC @peluko00

@gurneyalex
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-2809-by-gurneyalex-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit c5fcea1 into OCA:17.0 Feb 2, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3d1b0d9. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.