SFCGAL: Use WKB instead of WKT

[lbartoletti]

What does this PR do?

This PR adds support for WKB (Well-Known Binary) instead of WKT (Well-Known Text) for SFCGAL versions greater than or equal to 1.5.2.

It is noted that SFCGAL introduced support for WKB in version 1.5.1, but full binary support is available starting from version 1.5.2. Therefore, this update ensures that WKB is utilized for SFCGAL versions 1.5.2 and above.

Additionally, the PR includes a check for the SFCGAL version using a configure_file to generate the ogr_sfcgal.h file, and modifications are made to the CMakeLists.txt to handle this versioning logic properly.

This PR is currently opened as a draft because I still need to verify some parts of the GDAL code to ensure everything is properly implemented and handled as expected.

What are related issues/pull requests?

Tasklist

• Build with SFCGAL <= and >= 1.5.2
• Make sure code is correctly formatted (cf pre-commit configuration)
• Add test case(s)
• Add documentation
• Updated Python API documentation (swig/include/python/docs/)
• Review
• Adjust for comments
• All CI builds and checks have passed

Environment

Provide environment details, if relevant:

• OS: Locally on FreeBSD 14 with SFCGAL 2.0.0 + GDAL CI
• Compiler: Clang + GDAL CI

[rouault]

I see alpine:edge has sfcgal 1.5.2, so we should get some CI testing for the new code path

[github-actions]

The GDAL project highly values your contribution and would love to see this work merged! Unfortunately this PR has not had any activity in the last 28 days and is being automatically marked as "stale". If you think this pull request should be merged, please check

• that all unit tests are passing

• that all comments by reviewers have been addressed

• that there is enough information for reviewers, in particular link
  to any issues which this pull request fixes

• that you have written unit tests where possible
  In case you should have any uncertainty, please leave a comment and we will be happy to help you proceed with this pull request.
  If there is no further activity on this pull request, it will be closed in 2 weeks.

[coveralls]

coverage: 73.688%. remained the same
when pulling fd0cd71 on lbartoletti:wkb_sfcgal
into fab593b on OSGeo:master.

[rouault]

@lbartoletti looks good to me. anything left on our side?

[lbartoletti]

@lbartoletti looks good to me. anything left on our side?

Yes, I have to add tests

[rouault]

Yes, I have to add tests

I haven't look in details, but there are SFCGAL related tests in autotest/ogr/ogr_geom.py . To be checked if they cover your added code paths.