-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #409 #411
Fix #409 #411
Conversation
Thanks for this! |
Ok, i made a release for this fix in my fork is you are interested. Added CI as well. Maybe I will push all the changes on my fork onto this (CI and CodeQl changes) when pseudo(seems like he is doing his thesis these days) is back |
Want to add folders that exclude synchronization, similar to this branch |
At the same time, is it possible to increase the function of reverse synchronization from anki to obsidian, thank you, there is currently no. |
Umm.. this PR is related to only to the fix mentioned. Yes its possible to increase reverse sync function, maybe you can open a new issue in my fork ? and maybe we can request @aviral-batra to make a PR to my fork ? |
|
Aha, so this is the potential fix... let me take a look through it now |
Phew, just a small change in the code then. Literally one line. Amazing! And yes, based on the console error, this should fix things... Now, I just gotta figure out how releasing updates works again... once I do that, hopefully can get this merged today and push out an update. |
Ah, yeah, and sorry for going dark for so long... I guess I got very busy with uni and knew that this code probably had all sorts of bad practices I'd rather not touch with a 10-foot pole. So my attitude kinda became "once I find an issue that starts affecting my workflow, I'll fix it ASAP". I've been using the plugin basically daily anyway so thought that I'd catch one quickly once any cropped up. Though, judging by the fact that this is issue 409, maybe not. |
Hi sorry, I haven't used obsidian to anki for a while but I re-opened my pull request with all of the updates that I made based on a bunch of pull requests. What was your question exactly I'm not sure I understand? |
Heyyy @Pseudonium !! Atlast you are back now :3 yeah uni times are busy times :3 As a proof of this working i have implemented e2e tests for all features. You can check the results here : ShootingKing-AM#52 (ShootingKing-AM#52 (comment)) |
Did you want me to open a pull req to your repo for my changes? |
Ah, so it was you who wrote the email! I haven't got a chance to read it as of yet.. So here's what I'm thinking - for now, I just wanna make as minimal changes to the codebase as possible, so I guess I can just pull this in, and then make a new release etc. |
Yes. but not now, since @Pseudonium is back, you can tidy up your PR right here.
Yup 😁
Yup but CI is going to fail i guess. |
Ah, ok, so what specifically would fail? |
|
Ok, so that's good now, at least. Anything else I should do before the release? |
Good for now. You can release a minor version now :) |
Suggestedworking fix to Issues #409 #407 #413