Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conditional allocation of ice shelf fluxes and data override call #7

Merged

Conversation

MJHarrison-GFDL
Copy link

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #7 (588dbf5) into ice_dynamics (c1358f2) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 588dbf5 differs from pull request most recent head 65bb92e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 65bb92e to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           ice_dynamics       #7      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         28.94%   28.94%   -0.01%     
================================================
  Files               242      242              
  Lines             71569    71571       +2     
================================================
- Hits              20719    20715       -4     
- Misses            50850    50856       +6     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/core/MOM_forcing_type.F90 42.66% <0.00%> (-0.28%) ⬇️
src/ice_shelf/MOM_ice_shelf.F90 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c1358f2...65bb92e. Read the comment docs.

@OlgaSergienko OlgaSergienko merged commit 755bfac into OlgaSergienko:ice_dynamics Jan 18, 2022
OlgaSergienko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2022
Corrected the descriptions of 60 variables
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants