Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use --zero-based-indices argument in Stdio and Http hosts #1015

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 9, 2017

Conversation

daviwil
Copy link
Contributor

@daviwil daviwil commented Nov 9, 2017

This change fixes an issue where the --zero-based-indices command
line argument was not being passed along to Configuration.ZeroBasedIndices
so that location/range serialization uses zero-based indices. This
fix wires up the argument to configure the serializer correctly.

This change fixes an issue where the --zero-based-indices command
line argument was not being passed along to Configuration.ZeroBasedIndices
so that location/range serialization uses zero-based indices. This
fix wires up the argument to configure the serializer correctly.
Copy link
Contributor

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@daviwil
Copy link
Contributor Author

daviwil commented Nov 9, 2017

Man, TravisCI is super slow today, looks like the build jobs timed out while the tests were running.

@filipw
Copy link
Member

filipw commented Nov 9, 2017

public static field 🙄 🤐 😄

@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Contributor

@daviwil : yeah, the OSX jobs get super-slow during US business hours.

@DustinCampbell
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to go ahead and force merge this. It doesn't actually have conflicts with master

@daviwil
Copy link
Contributor Author

daviwil commented Nov 9, 2017

Thanks a lot Dustin!

@DustinCampbell DustinCampbell merged commit cfad26b into OmniSharp:master Nov 9, 2017
@daviwil daviwil deleted the fix-zero-based-indices-arg branch November 10, 2017 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants