Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[User model] enable push for simulators #1297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2023

Conversation

emawby
Copy link
Contributor

@emawby emawby commented Aug 10, 2023

Description

One Line Summary

Enable push for simulators. Equivalent to #1244

Details

Our provision detection in OneSignalMobileProvision is not successfully able to find the embedded mobile provision for simulators. This might only affect Xcode managed provisioning profiles.

This change is a workaround to that issue to always set testType to 1 since simulators need to receive push in the sandbox environment.

Scope

push on simulators

Testing

Manual testing

tested receiving push on a simulator

Affected code checklist

  • Notifications
    • Display
    • Open
    • Push Processing
    • Confirm Deliveries
  • Outcomes
  • Sessions
  • In-App Messaging
  • REST API requests
  • Public API changes

Checklist

Overview

  • I have filled out all REQUIRED sections above
  • PR does one thing
    • If it is hard to explain how any codes changes are related to each other then it most likely needs to be more than one PR
  • Any Public API changes are explained in the PR details and conform to existing APIs

Testing

  • I have included test coverage for these changes, or explained why they are not needed
  • All automated tests pass, or I explained why that is not possible
  • I have personally tested this on my device, or explained why that is not possible

Final pass

  • Code is as readable as possible.
    • Simplify with less code, followed by splitting up code into well named functions and variables, followed by adding comments to the code.
  • I have reviewed this PR myself, ensuring it meets each checklist item
    • WIP (Work In Progress) is ok, but explain what is still in progress and what you would like feedback on. Start the PR title with "WIP" to indicate this.

This change is Reviewable

@@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ class OSSubscriptionModel: OSModel {

// Set test_type if subscription model is PUSH
if type == .push {
#if targetEnvironment(simulator)
self.testType = OSUIApplicationReleaseMode.UIApplicationReleaseDev.rawValue
#endif
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

self.testType will just be overwrite below. In order to prevent that we need to use an #else here or some kind of early return logic.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@emawby emawby Aug 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is fine if we are able to properly detect that it is an AdHoc or wildcard build on the simulator I want it to be overwritten. The issue is when the release mode is "unknown"

Copy link
Member

@jkasten2 jkasten2 Aug 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, that wasn't clear. I recommend a comment or explicitly only doing that logic when it is unknown then.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I updated it to only set if the mode is unknown

Cherry-pick of #1244

Our provision detection in OneSignalMobileProvision is not successfully able to find the embedded mobile provision for simulators. This might only affect Xcode managed provisioning profiles.

This change is a workaround to that issue to always set testType to 1 since simulators need to receive push in the sandbox environment.
@emawby emawby force-pushed the user_model/enable_push_for_simulators branch from 887b6b8 to 3e64983 Compare August 10, 2023 03:16
@emawby emawby requested a review from jkasten2 August 10, 2023 03:17
Copy link
Member

@jkasten2 jkasten2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@emawby emawby merged commit 4984928 into major_release_5.0.0 Aug 10, 2023
1 of 2 checks passed
@emawby emawby deleted the user_model/enable_push_for_simulators branch August 10, 2023 03:23
nan-li pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
…mulators

[User model] enable push for simulators
nan-li pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
…mulators

[User model] enable push for simulators
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants