Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EJR: make ZooKeeper code path optional #498

Closed
soxofaan opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

EJR: make ZooKeeper code path optional #498

soxofaan opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@soxofaan
Copy link
Member

Already started implementing, but figured to track it with separate ticket (related to #236):
make the ZooKeeper part of DoubleJobRegistry optional, e.g. so that it can be disabled

soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2023
set_dependency_status, set_dependency_usage, set_proxy_user, set_application_id
@soxofaan soxofaan changed the title EJR: make ZooKeeper code path optionsl EJR: make ZooKeeper code path optional Aug 30, 2023
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
…_user_jobs listings

Process graph (and job options) are not to be included in user job listings,
so align `ZkJobRegistry.get_user_jobs` to not produce then like `ElasticJobRegistry`

refs: eu-cdse/openeo-cdse-infra#141, #498
@soxofaan soxofaan self-assigned this May 17, 2024
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
…_user_jobs listings

Process graph (and job options) are not to be included in user job listings,
so align `ZkJobRegistry.get_user_jobs` to not produce then like `ElasticJobRegistry`

refs: eu-cdse/openeo-cdse-infra#141, #498
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
…kJobRegistry process graph size

to avoid slamming zookeeper with entries that are excessively large

refs: eu-cdse/openeo-cdse-infra#141, #498
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue May 18, 2024
…kJobRegistry process graph size

to avoid slamming zookeeper with entries that are excessively large

refs: eu-cdse/openeo-cdse-infra#141, #498
@soxofaan
Copy link
Member Author

As discussed, I think it's best to consider this ticket to be closed and continue work in follow up tickets like eu-cdse/openeo-cdse-infra#141

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant