SyncProgress类中使用 ip + port 方式作为map key会有冲突问题 #2429
Comments
|
@HappyUncle 如果你方便，尽快提个 PR 过来 |
happy-v587
added a commit
to happy-v587/pika
that referenced
this issue
Feb 29, 2024
OpenAtomFoundation#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
AlexStocks
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 29, 2024
#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
luky116
pushed a commit
to luky116/pika
that referenced
this issue
Mar 14, 2024
…on#2431) OpenAtomFoundation#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
luky116
pushed a commit
to luky116/pika
that referenced
this issue
Mar 14, 2024
…on#2431) OpenAtomFoundation#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
luky116
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2024
#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
bigdaronlee163
pushed a commit
to bigdaronlee163/pika
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2024
…on#2431) OpenAtomFoundation#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
cheniujh
pushed a commit
to cheniujh/pika
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2024
…on#2431) OpenAtomFoundation#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
cheniujh
pushed a commit
to cheniujh/pika
that referenced
this issue
Sep 24, 2024
…on#2431) OpenAtomFoundation#2429 Signed-off-by: HappyUncle <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is this a regression?
Yes
Description
SyncProgress 类中，有使用 ip + std::to_string(port) 的方式作为 map 的 key，存在key重复问题。
https://github.com/OpenAtomFoundation/pika/blob/unstable/src/pika_consensus.cc#L99
比如，如下两个ip和port信息，key都是 10.1.1.12379
Please provide a link to a minimal reproduction of the bug
No response
Screenshots or videos
No response
Please provide the version you discovered this bug in (check about page for version information)
No response
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: