Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct name for Request class in Payment Module #1029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2020

Conversation

tmotyl
Copy link
Contributor

@tmotyl tmotyl commented Jun 8, 2020

There is already a class with name
Mage_Paygate_Model_Authorizenet_Request
in Paygate module.

Alternatively we should just remove the class as it was never used (autoload couldnt reach it).
What's your opinion on that?

@sreichel
Copy link
Contributor

sreichel commented Jun 8, 2020

I did not touch it in #725 for this reason. I'd prefer to remove it ....

@sreichel sreichel added Cleanup Component: Payment Relates to Mage_Payment labels Jun 8, 2020
There is already a class with name
Mage_Paygate_Model_Authorizenet_Request
in Paygate module.

The class in Payment module was never used by autoloader
 so it's safe to remove it
@tmotyl
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmotyl commented Jun 9, 2020

I've changed th PR to remove the class.

@colinmollenhour colinmollenhour merged commit 6f2a1f1 into OpenMage:1.9.4.x Jun 11, 2020
@sreichel sreichel added this to the Release 19.4.4 milestone Jun 26, 2020
edannenberg pushed a commit to edannenberg/magento-lts that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
…rizenet_Request

There is already a class with name Mage_Paygate_Model_Authorizenet_Request
in Paygate module.
edannenberg pushed a commit to edannenberg/magento-lts that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
…rizenet_Request

There is already a class with name Mage_Paygate_Model_Authorizenet_Request
in Paygate module.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants