fix:standardize_lang

[JarbasAl]

#281 wasnt quite right

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced type safety with updated type annotations for language handling functions.
  • Improved handling of return values in language-related functions for better reliability.
• Bug Fixes
  • Added checks to ensure robust behavior when no language candidates are found.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on the ovos_utils/lang/__init__.py file, enhancing type annotations and refining the logic within the standardize_lang_tag and get_language_dir functions. The modifications include updated function signatures with type hints, improved handling of return values, and more robust path construction. These updates aim to improve type safety and ensure consistent behavior of the functions.

Changes

File	Change Summary
ovos_utils/lang/init.py	- Updated function signatures for standardize_lang_tag and get_language_dir with type hints. - Explicitly converted return value of std to string in standardize_lang_tag. - Modified path handling in get_language_dir to construct full paths. - Added conditional check to return None if candidates list is empty. - Updated return statement to return full path of the best candidate.

Possibly related PRs

• feat:standardize_lang_tag new utils #267: The changes in this PR involve the standardize_lang_tag function, which is directly related to the modifications made to the same function in the main PR, particularly in terms of type annotations and logic refinement.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
Type hints and paths have found their way.
Functions now dance with clarity bright,
Ensuring each return is just right.
With a hop and a skip, we refine our song,
In the world of Python, we all belong! 🐇

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.44444% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.72%. Comparing base (4548352) to head (11390d4).
Report is 45 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
ovos_utils/lang/__init__.py	44.44%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #283      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.80%   47.72%   -6.09%     
==========================================
  Files          60       31      -29     
  Lines        3942     3250     -692     
==========================================
- Hits         2121     1551     -570     
+ Misses       1821     1699     -122     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.