Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove ERC165Storage #3880

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022
Merged

Conversation

JulissaDantes
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3641

The use of storage makes it more expensive to execute supportsInterface, and also to deploy the contract. Deployment costs are not necessarily worse though, because when storage is not used it requires more bytecode, but probably not enough to match it. After verifying that the percentage of people using ERC165storage as opposed to the ERC165 version is considerably lower, we are removing the ERC165Storage contract.

PR Checklist

  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • Changelog entry

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
contracts/utils/introspection/ERC165.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@frangio frangio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

This was referenced Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants