Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
windows compatibility through multisync #125
windows compatibility through multisync #125
Changes from all commits
cbacc24
c6efee9
9cda046
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a particular reason why you've chosen to pass these in to main and therefore pass them around everywhere? You could just as easily have defined
ins
andouts
as global variables like this as before, and then have themultisyncTask
check the global variables without having to pass the extra argument.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
multisync may complain about that, I have face some error, multisync not work properly, and it's better for unit test functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Multisync shouldn't complain, but I get the point about unit testing. I just don't like the repetition in
multisyncTask outs: outs.something
. But I guess without having them as global the only option would be a macro that inserted the left hand side as the first argument so you could at least writeouts.multisyncTask something()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, I have to take time recall my macro knowledge , now dont need extra outs pass in macro
multisyncTask: outs.sendJson resp