fixing fetch link #24
Conversation
Deploying amrit with
|
| Latest commit: |
267f99c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://750d7f23.amrit.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-contact-us.amrit.pages.dev |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to error handling and response logic in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@drtechie has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/contact.astro (1)
24-24: Consider using structured logging.While
console.log(data)is helpful for debugging, consider using a more structured approach for better debugging and monitoring.- console.log(data) + console.log('[Contact Form Response]:', { + status: response.status, + data, + timestamp: new Date().toISOString() + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/pages/api/sendEmail.ts(0 hunks)src/pages/contact.astro(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/pages/api/sendEmail.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/contact.astro (1)
17-18: LGTM! URL construction looks correct.
The change from .href to .origin is appropriate as it ensures the base URL is used without path components, preventing potential double-path issues.
Let's verify the API endpoint accessibility:
✅ Verification successful
URL construction and API endpoint are properly aligned
The verification confirms:
- The API endpoint exists at the correct path
src/pages/api/sendEmail.ts - The endpoint is properly implemented as a POST route that handles form data
- No other files are using a different endpoint pattern
- Using
.originin the URL construction is correct as it matches the API route's location
The change from .href to .origin ensures proper URL construction without path duplication, and the endpoint is available at the expected location.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the sendEmail API endpoint exists and follows the expected pattern
# Expected: Find the API endpoint at /api/sendEmail
# Search for the API route file
fd -t f "sendEmail.ts" "src/pages/api"
# Verify the endpoint pattern in other areas of the codebase
rg -g '!contact.astro' "api/sendEmail" "src"
Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the API endpoint implementation to ensure it matches the expected usage
cat src/pages/api/sendEmail.ts
# Also check if there are any other files that might be using a different endpoint pattern
rg -g '!contact.astro' "fetch.*sendEmail" src
Length of output: 1469
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/contact.astro (1)
27-39: Enhance error handling and user feedback.While the error handling is more comprehensive, consider these improvements:
- The generic error message "Something went wrong" could be more specific based on the error type
- Consider handling other successful HTTP status codes (e.g., 201, 204)
- The "JSON parsing error" message isn't user-friendly
Here's a suggested improvement:
try { const data = await response.json(); - if (response.status === 200) { + if (response.ok) { // This checks for status codes 200-299 message = data.message; messageType = "success"; } else { - message = "Something went wrong. Please try again."; + message = data.error || "Unable to send message. Please try again later."; messageType = "error"; } } catch (e) { - message = "JSON parsing error"; + message = "We're experiencing technical difficulties. Please try again later."; messageType = "error"; - fetchResponse = await response.text(); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/pages/api/sendEmail.ts(1 hunks)src/pages/contact.astro(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/pages/api/sendEmail.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/pages/contact.astro (2)
19-20: Well-structured API endpoint URL construction!
Using URL(Astro.request.url).origin is a robust approach for constructing the API endpoint URL, making it work correctly across different environments.
19-20: Verify API endpoint usage across the codebase.
Let's ensure the API endpoint is consistently used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
API endpoint usage is localized to contact page
The sendEmail API endpoint is only used in src/pages/contact.astro and there are no other fetch calls in the codebase that need similar URL construction. The changes are self-contained and don't require modifications elsewhere.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of sendEmail API usage
rg -l "sendEmail" --type astro --type typescript
# Look for other fetch calls that might need similar URL construction
rg "fetch\(" --type astro --type typescript
Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sendEmail API usage without file type filters
rg -l "sendEmail"
# Look for fetch calls that might need similar URL construction
rg "fetch\(" -A 2
Length of output: 236
| let formUrl = "" | ||
| let fetchResponse = "" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debugging variables from production code.
The variables formUrl and fetchResponse appear to be used for debugging purposes. Exposing internal URLs and raw error responses to end users is not recommended in production code as it could reveal sensitive implementation details.
Remove these debug variables and their corresponding display in the UI.
| <p>{formUrl}</p> | ||
| <p>{fetchResponse}</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debug information from UI.
Displaying formUrl and fetchResponse in the UI exposes internal implementation details and potentially sensitive information to end users. This debug information should be removed from production code.
Remove these lines:
- <p>{formUrl}</p>
- <p>{fetchResponse}</p>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <p>{formUrl}</p> | |
| <p>{fetchResponse}</p> |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/contact.astro (2)
27-42: Simplify error handling logic.The current implementation with response cloning and nested try-catch blocks is overly complex. Consider simplifying it for better maintainability.
Here's a suggested refactor:
- const clonedResponse = response.clone(); - try { - const data = await response.json(); - if (response.status === 200) { - message = data.message; - messageType = "success"; // Success - } else { - message = "Something went wrong. Please try again."; - messageType = "error"; // Failure - } - } catch (e) { - message = "JSON parsing error"; - messageType = "error"; - fetchResponse = await clonedResponse.text(); - } + const data = response.ok + ? await response.json().catch(() => ({ message: "Invalid response format" })) + : { message: "Something went wrong. Please try again." }; + + message = data.message; + messageType = response.ok ? "success" : "error";
Line range hint
74-81: Add CSRF protection to the form.The form handles sensitive user data but lacks CSRF protection. Consider adding a CSRF token to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
Implement CSRF protection by:
- Generating a CSRF token on the server side
- Including it as a hidden input in the form
- Validating the token in the API endpoint
Example implementation:
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value={generateCSRFToken()} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/contact.astro(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/pages/contact.astro (2)
19-20: LGTM: Improved URL construction using request origin.
The URL construction using new URL(Astro.request.url).origin is a good practice as it makes the endpoint relative to the current environment.
69-70: Previous review comment is still applicable.
📋 Description
Adding fetch url
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
formUrlandfetchResponsevariables in the form submission.Bug Fixes
Chores