[33] - Update common_ci.properties #48
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip Announcements
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional context usedGitleaks
Additional comments not posted (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
src/main/environment/common_ci.properties
74-75: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
75-76: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/main/environment/common_ci.properties (3)
67-72: LGTM!The addition of the new service configuration properties looks good.
76-76: LGTM!The addition of the
scheduling-slotsizeproperty looks good.Tools
Gitleaks
75-76: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
77-77: LGTM!The change in the position of the
prescriptionproperty is fine, as it does not affect its functionality.
| appId: 85696 | ||
| authKey: 8BfRcBAGkTQkbQ6 | ||
| authSecret: jgQRyySBGu2YcaJ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid hardcoding sensitive information. Store them securely.
The addition of the authentication properties appId, authKey, and authSecret is fine, but the values for authKey and authSecret should not be hardcoded in the properties file as they are sensitive information.
Hardcoding API keys and secrets poses a security risk. If this file is accidentally committed to version control or exposed, it could lead to unauthorized access.
Consider storing the sensitive values securely and retrieving them from environment variables or a secrets management system. For example:
authKey[email protected]_KEY@
authSecret[email protected]_SECRET@The actual values can be set in the environment or retrieved from a secure secrets store.
Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track this security improvement?
Tools
Gitleaks
74-75: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Description
Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit