-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - agrello #13875
New Components - agrello #13875
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
3 Skipped Deployments
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new modules and functionalities to the Agrello application. Key features include actions for retrieving documents, sources for emitting events when documents are added or signed, and enhancements for managing folders and webhooks. New utility functions for file path normalization and object parsing are also included. Overall, these updates significantly expand the capabilities of the Agrello platform. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Signature (Instant) - New Signed Document (Instant) - New Document Actions - Get Document
components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/new-signature-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/new-signed-document-instant.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (11)
- components/agrello/actions/get-document/get-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-document/new-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-document/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/new-signature-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/new-signed-document-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/test-event.mjs
Additional comments not posted (29)
components/agrello/package.json (2)
3-3
: Version increment looks good!The version number has been incremented from
0.0.1
to0.1.0
, following semantic versioning. This indicates a new release with added features.
15-17
: The new dependency looks good!The addition of the
@pipedream/platform
dependency with version^3.0.1
suggests an enhancement or addition of functionality that relies on this platform package. The version constraint allows for any compatible version within the3.x.x
range.Verify that the new dependency is being used correctly in the codebase by running the following script:
Verification successful
The new dependency is used extensively and correctly across the codebase.
The
@pipedream/platform
dependency is imported and utilized in various components for handling HTTP requests, configuration errors, and polling intervals, confirming its necessity and correct usage.
- Files with usage include:
packages/prompts/src/index.ts
components/zoho_catalyst/app/zoho_catalyst.app.ts
components/yelp/app/yelp.app.ts
components/xperiencify/app/xperiencify.app.ts
- ...and many more.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `@pipedream/platform` dependency. # Test: Search for the dependency import statements. Expect: At least one import statement. rg --type typescript $'@pipedream/platform'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `@pipedream/platform` dependency. # Test: Search for the dependency import statements in TypeScript files. Expect: At least one import statement. rg --type ts '@pipedream/platform'Length of output: 12237
components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-10
: LGTM!The test event data looks good and follows the expected structure for the
new-signature-instant
event. The placeholder UUIDs and email are valid for testing purposes.components/agrello/sources/new-signed-document-instant/new-signed-document-instant.mjs (1)
1-22
: LGTM!The new source component for the "new-signed-document-instant" event is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective. The component configuration follows the expected structure, and the overridden methods (
getEvent
andgetSummary
) provide the necessary functionality.The past review comment suggesting a change to the
getSummary
method has already been addressed in the current code.components/agrello/sources/new-signature-instant/new-signature-instant.mjs (4)
1-3
: LGTM!The imports are necessary for the component to extend the base configuration and provide a sample emit for testing. The file paths are relative and assume a specific directory structure.
4-12
: LGTM!The metadata properties are correctly defined and match the requirements specified in the PR objectives. The
key
property follows the naming convention, thetype
property is set tosource
, and thededupe
property is set tounique
for proper deduplication of events.
12-20
: LGTM!The
getEvent
method correctly returns the event type specified in the PR objectives. ThegetSummary
method generates a meaningful summary message that includes the relevant information from the event payload using string interpolation.
21-22
: LGTM!The imported
sampleEmit
module is correctly assigned to thesampleEmit
property for testing purposes.components/agrello/actions/get-document/get-document.mjs (2)
1-35
: LGTM!The code for the
agrello-get-document
action looks good:
- The metadata is properly defined, including a helpful link to the API documentation.
- The props are correctly defined, referencing the
agrello
app for allowed values.- The
run
method follows best practices, usingasync/await
, handling the$
object, making the API request, exporting a$summary
, and returning the response.Great job!
11-25
: Verify thefolderId
anddocumentId
prop definitions.The
folderId
anddocumentId
props are usingpropDefinition
to reference theagrello
app, which is a good practice for fetching allowed values.However, please verify that the
agrello
app has the correspondingpropDefinitions
forfolderId
anddocumentId
, and that they are correctly fetching the allowed values from the Agrello API.Run the following script to verify the prop definitions:
Verification successful
Prop definitions for
folderId
anddocumentId
are correctly implemented. Both prop definitions are present in thecomponents/agrello/agrello.app.mjs
file, with appropriate attributes and options functions to fetch allowed values from the Agrello API.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `folderId` and `documentId` prop definitions in the `agrello` app. # Test: Search for the `folderId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `folderId`. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]folderId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs # Test: Search for the `documentId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `documentId`. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]documentId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `folderId` and `documentId` prop definitions in the `agrello` app. # Test: Search for the `folderId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `folderId`. rg -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]folderId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs # Test: Search for the `documentId` prop definition. Expect: A `propDefinition` array for `documentId`. rg -A 5 $'propDefinitions:\s*\[\s*\{\s*name:\s*[\'"]documentId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any `propDefinitions` in the `agrello` app file to verify their existence and structure. # Test: Search for any `propDefinitions` in the file. rg -A 10 'propDefinitions' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search specifically for the `documentId` prop definition in the `agrello` app file. # Test: Search for the `documentId` prop definition. rg -A 10 'documentId' components/agrello/agrello.app.mjsLength of output: 646
components/agrello/sources/common/base.mjs (4)
3-11
: LGTM!The
props
are correctly defined and typed. Theagrello
import path is relative to the current file and seems correct. SettingcustomResponse
tofalse
for thehttp
prop is a good practice to let the platform handle the response. Using$.service.db
for thedb
prop is correct to access the platform's DB service.
12-19
: LGTM!The
methods
are correctly defined and use thedb
prop to interact with the DB. The method names are prefixed with_
to indicate that they are internal methods. ThewebhookId
key is used consistently in both methods.
20-35
: LGTM!The
hooks
are correctly defined as async functions. Theactivate
hook creates a webhook with the event and URL and sets the hook ID in the DB. Thedeactivate
hook retrieves the webhook ID from the DB and deletes the webhook. Theagrello
prop is used to interact with the Agrello API. The internal methods_setHookId
and_getHookId
are used appropriately.
36-43
: Looks good, but ensurethis.getSummary
is defined.The
run
function is correctly defined as an async function. Destructuring theevent
from thebody
is a good practice for clarity. Calculating the timestamp usingDate.parse(new Date())
is correct. Emitting an event with the event name and an object containing relevant data is a common pattern. Theid
construction using theevent.containerId
and timestamp ensures uniqueness. Thets
is correctly set to the calculated timestamp.Note: The
summary
is obtained by callingthis.getSummary
, which is not defined in this file. Ensure thatthis.getSummary
is defined in the specific source that extends this base.components/agrello/sources/new-document/test-event.mjs (1)
1-70
: The test event looks good!The structure and sample data of the test event aligns with the expected schema for a new document event. It includes all the relevant properties such as
id
,name
,status
,parties
,invitations
,files
,signatures
, and most importantly, thefolderId
which is a required property for thenew-document
source.This test event will serve as a good example payload for testing the
new-document
source.components/agrello/sources/new-document/new-document.mjs (5)
1-4
: LGTM!The imports are correctly defined and serve the necessary purpose.
5-27
: Looks good!The metadata and prop definitions are correctly defined and align with the component's purpose and requirements.
28-67
: Great implementation!The component's methods are implemented correctly and handle the necessary logic for emitting new document events efficiently. The use of pagination and filtering ensures that only new documents are processed and emitted with the required metadata.
69-73
: LGTM!The
deploy
hook is implemented correctly and emits an initial batch of events during component deployment with a reasonable limit.
74-78
: Looks good!The
run
method andsampleEmit
export are correctly defined and serve their intended purposes.components/agrello/agrello.app.mjs (9)
7-18
: LGTM!The
folderId
property definition is correctly implemented, and theoptions
method is using thelistFolders
method to fetch folder options asynchronously, which is the correct approach.
19-39
: LGTM!The
documentId
property definition is correctly implemented, and theoptions
method is using thelistDocuments
method to fetch document options asynchronously based on the selected folder, which is the correct approach.
60-75
: LGTM!The
listFolders
method is correctly implemented and is using thegetSubFolders
method to fetch subfolders recursively. The method is returning an array of folder options with the correct label and value format.
77-91
: LGTM!The
getSubFolders
method is correctly implemented and is using recursion to fetch subfolders. The method is returning an array of folder options with the correct label and value format.
92-99
: LGTM!The
listDocuments
method is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequest
method to make API requests. The method is passing thefolderId
parameter to the API request path.
100-104
: LGTM!The
getDocument
method is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequest
method to make API requests. The method is passing thedocumentId
parameter to the API request path.
105-111
: LGTM!The
createWebhook
method is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequest
method to make API requests. The method is using thePOST
HTTP method to create a webhook.
112-117
: LGTM!The
deleteWebhook
method is correctly implemented and is using the_makeRequest
method to make API requests. The method is using theDELETE
HTTP method to delete a webhook and is passing thehookId
parameter to the API request path.
118-141
: LGTM!The
paginate
method is correctly implemented and is using theasync *
syntax to create an asynchronous generator function. The method is using themaxResults
parameter to limit the number of results returned, thepage
parameter to paginate through the results, and thefn
parameter to call the API request function.
…-instant.mjs Co-authored-by: Leo Vu <[email protected]>
/approve |
Resolves #13863.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update