Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Components] Altiria: New action send-sms #13946

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes commented Sep 13, 2024

WHY

Resolves #13923

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced SMS sending functionality through the Altiria service, allowing users to send messages to specified phone numbers.
    • Added methods for improved API request handling, including URL construction, header management, and authentication.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated authKeys method to streamline authentication processes.
  • Chores

    • Updated version number in the package configuration to reflect new features and dependencies.

@jcortes jcortes added the action New Action Request label Sep 13, 2024
@jcortes jcortes self-assigned this Sep 13, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 16, 2024 2:27pm

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 13, 2024

@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new action for sending SMS messages via the Altiria service, encapsulated in the send-sms.mjs file. It allows users to specify the recipient's phone number and message content while ensuring compliance with international formatting. Additionally, the altiria.app.mjs file has been updated to enhance API request handling, replacing the authKeys method with more modular methods for constructing requests. The package.json file reflects a new version and updated dependencies.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/altiria/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs Added a new action for sending SMS messages, defining required parameters and implementing the sendSms method for API interaction.
components/altiria/altiria.app.mjs Introduced new methods for API request handling, including getUrl, getHeaders, getDataAuth, makeRequest, and post, while removing the authKeys method.
components/altiria/package.json Updated version number from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added a dependency on @pipedream/platform version 3.0.1.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Send a text message to a given number (Issue #13923)
Ensure phone number is in E.164 format (Issue #13923)
Require message content as a string (Issue #13923)

Suggested labels

ai-assisted

Poem

In a world where messages fly,
A rabbit hops, oh so spry!
With SMS now sent with glee,
Altiria's magic, can't you see?
Hopping through code, bright and new,
Celebrating changes, just for you! 🐇✨


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96a2bea and a8bae08.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/altiria/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/altiria/altiria.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/altiria/package.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/altiria/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • components/altiria/altiria.app.mjs
  • components/altiria/package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/altiria/altiria.app.mjs (1)

31-41: LGTM with a minor suggestion!

The makeRequest method correctly performs the HTTP request using the axios library. It uses the previously defined methods to prepare the request parameters and provides a clean and flexible interface using default function parameters and object destructuring.

One minor suggestion:

  • The debug option is set to true, which can be helpful for troubleshooting but should be removed or made configurable before deploying to production to avoid exposing sensitive information in logs.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b463601 and c960a38.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/altiria/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/altiria/altiria.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/altiria/package.json (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
components/altiria/package.json (2)

3-3: Version update looks good!

The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 aligns with the introduction of the new "send-sms" action, as per semantic versioning conventions. This change accurately reflects the addition of new functionality to the package.


14-18: The addition of the dependencies section looks good!

The inclusion of the @pipedream/platform package as a dependency suggests that the component may now leverage functionalities or features provided by this platform package. Specifying the dependency using a stable release version (3.0.1) is also a good practice.

However, please verify that the introduced @pipedream/platform dependency is actually being used within the component code. If the dependency is unused, it should be removed to keep the package.json lean and avoid unnecessary dependencies.

To verify the usage of the @pipedream/platform package, run the following script:

Verification successful

The @pipedream/platform package is extensively used and justified

The comprehensive search results confirm that the @pipedream/platform package is widely utilized throughout the codebase. Key observations include:

  • Frequent imports of axios for HTTP requests
  • Usage of ConfigurationError for error handling
  • Utilization of DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVAL in various components
  • Consistent usage across different file types (.ts, .js, .jsx, .tsx)

The package appears to provide essential utilities and is integral to the functionality of numerous components. Its widespread use justifies its inclusion as a dependency in the package.json file.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `@pipedream/platform` package.

# Test: Search for the package import. Expect: At least one occurrence.
rg --type typescript --type javascript $'@pipedream/platform'

Length of output: 95


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `@pipedream/platform` package using a more comprehensive approach.

# Search for different import patterns in .js, .ts, .jsx, and .tsx files
fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsx | xargs rg -i "@pipedream/platform"

# Search for require statements
fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsx | xargs rg -i "require\s*\(\s*['\"]@pipedream/platform"

# Search for dynamic imports
fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsx | xargs rg -i "import\s*\(\s*['\"]@pipedream/platform"

# Search for comments mentioning the package (in case it's imported dynamically or used in a non-standard way)
fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsx | xargs rg -i "//.*@pipedream/platform"

Length of output: 14755

components/altiria/altiria.app.mjs (4)

8-10: LGTM!

The getUrl method correctly constructs the API endpoint URL by appending the given path to the base URL. The hardcoded base URL is acceptable as it's unlikely to change frequently.


11-17: LGTM!

The getHeaders method correctly constructs the headers object for the API requests. It merges the provided headers with the default ones and sets the Content-Type and Accept headers to the appropriate values for JSON format.


18-30: LGTM!

The getDataAuth method correctly appends the authentication credentials to the request data. It uses object destructuring to extract the API key and secret from this.$auth, which is a clean and readable approach.


42-46: LGTM!

The post method correctly simplifies making POST requests by wrapping the makeRequest method and specifying the HTTP method as "POST". It uses the spread operator to pass along any additional arguments to the makeRequest method, providing flexibility.

components/altiria/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs (5)

1-2: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and necessary for the action to function.


3-21: LGTM!

The action's metadata is well-defined and follows the expected structure. The input properties are correctly typed and have appropriate labels and descriptions. The descriptions provide sufficient information for users to understand how to use the action and the constraints on the input values.


22-29: LGTM!

The sendSms method is correctly defined and uses the Altiria app configuration to send the request. The method accepts an args object that allows for flexibility in the request data.


30-50: LGTM!

The run method is correctly defined and orchestrates the execution of the action as expected. The method extracts the necessary data from the action's context and passes it to the sendSms method. The method exports a summary message upon successful execution, which provides feedback to the user.


51-51: LGTM!

The export statement is correct and necessary for the action to be usable by the Pipedream platform.

Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Just one suggestion about improving the msg prop description. Moving to QA!

components/altiria/actions/send-sms/send-sms.mjs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jcortes
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jcortes commented Sep 16, 2024

/approve

@jcortes jcortes merged commit 7567870 into PipedreamHQ:master Sep 16, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
action New Action Request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] altiria
3 participants