-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - firefish #13948
New Components - firefish #13948
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements to the Firefish application, including a new action for unsubscribing email addresses from marketing communications, methods for searching and updating contacts and candidates, and the establishment of event sources for new candidates and contacts. Additionally, the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Tip OpenAI O1 model for chat
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs (1)
17-53
: LGTM! Consider adding error handling and a more detailed summary message.The function correctly searches for contacts and candidates with the given email and updates their
EmailMarketing
flag tofalse
. It aligns with the PR objective of implementing theunsubscribe-email
action.Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling for the Firefish API calls to handle potential failures gracefully.
- Provide a more detailed summary message, e.g., include the count of updated contacts and candidates.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (8)
- components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/firefish/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/new-candidate-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs
[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (22)
components/firefish/package.json (1)
3-3
: LGTM!The version update to
0.1.0
is appropriate for introducing new functionality. The addition of the@pipedream/platform
dependency with a reasonable version constraint is a good practice. It will likely provide useful utilities for building Pipedream components.Also applies to: 15-17
components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1)
1-20
: LGTM! The test event payload looks good.The exported object contains relevant properties for a contact, such as:
- Basic info:
Ref
,FirstName
,Surname
,Title
- Company info:
CompanyRef
,CompanyName
,JobTitle
- Contact info:
EmailAddress
,MobileNumber
,WorkNumber
- Metadata:
IsArchived
,CreatedBy
,Created
,UpdatedBy
,Updated
- Last action info:
LastActionRef
,LastActionName
,LastActionDate
The property names are clear and self-explanatory. The values appear to be appropriately mocked for testing purposes.
Having a well-structured test event payload is beneficial for testing the component and serving as documentation for the expected event structure.
components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs (2)
1-28
: LGTM! The test event payload structure aligns with the expected candidate attributes.The exported object in this file serves as a well-structured test event payload for the
new-candidate-created
source component. The property names and data types align with the expected candidate attributes mentioned in the PR objectives.
5-5
: Verify if thenull
value forDateOfBirth
is intentional.The
DateOfBirth
property is set tonull
in this test event payload. Please confirm if this is intentional, considering that the date of birth may not always be available or required for candidate records in Firefish.To verify if
null
is a valid value forDateOfBirth
, you can run the following script:Verification successful
null
value forDateOfBirth
is intentional and consistent with other integrationsThe
null
value forDateOfBirth
in the test event is intentional and aligns with common practices across various integrations in the codebase. Other integrations, such as Deputy, also usenull
forDateOfBirth
in their test events. This suggests thatnull
is a valid and expected value for this field when the date of birth is not available or not provided.
- Found in
components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs
:"DateOfBirth": null,
- Similar usage in Deputy integration:
components/deputy/sources/new-timesheet-saved/test-event.mjs
andcomponents/deputy/sources/new-colleague-created/test-event.mjs
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `DateOfBirth` can be `null` in the Firefish API documentation. # Test: Search for `DateOfBirth` in the Firefish API documentation. # Expect: Find information confirming that `null` is a valid value. rg --type markdown -A 5 $'DateOfBirth' $(fd -e md -d 1 firefish)Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for DateOfBirth usage in Firefish integration files echo "Searching for DateOfBirth usage in Firefish integration files:" rg -i "DateOfBirth" $(fd -e js -e mjs -e ts firefish) echo -e "\nSearching for test files or sample data related to candidate creation:" fd -e js -e mjs -e ts -e json firefish | rg -i "test|sample|mock|fixture" | xargs rg -i "DateOfBirth" echo -e "\nSearching for comments or inline documentation about DateOfBirth:" rg -i "DateOfBirth" $(fd -e js -e mjs -e ts firefish) -C 3 | rg "//|/\*|\*"Length of output: 4246
components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1)
1-26
: LGTM!The new source component "New Contact Created" is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objectives. The component follows the expected structure, imports the necessary modules, and overrides the required methods appropriately.
The
getResourceFn
method correctly returns thesearchContacts
function from thefirefish
object, and thegenerateMeta
method constructs the event metadata as expected, using the contact ID, a summary, and a timestamp derived from the contact's creation date.The component is properly configured with the necessary properties, promoting code reuse and consistency by importing and using the common base configuration and sample emit module.
Overall, the implementation looks good and is ready to be merged.
components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/new-candidate-created.mjs (5)
1-3
: LGTM!The imports are correctly set up, inheriting common functionality and providing a sample event for testing. The file paths are valid, assuming the referenced files exist at the specified locations.
4-11
: LGTM!The metadata for the new source component is properly defined, with appropriate values for properties like
key
,name
,description
,version
,type
, anddedupe
. The included documentation link in the description is a nice touch for guiding users. Thededupe
strategy of "unique" is suitable for emitting events with distinct IDs.
25-25
: LGTM!Including the
sampleEmit
property with the imported sample event is a good practice for facilitating testing of the component. It provides a representative event payload that can be used to verify the component's behavior.
17-23
: Verify the existence and format ofcandidate.Ref
andcandidate.Created
.The
generateMeta
method assumes that thecandidate
object hasRef
andCreated
properties with the expected formats. Please ensure that:
- The
Ref
property exists on thecandidate
object and contains a unique identifier for the candidate.- The
Created
property exists on thecandidate
object and contains a valid date string that can be parsed byDate.parse
.Run the following script to verify the structure of the
candidate
object:Verification successful
Verified:
candidate.Ref
andcandidate.Created
properties exist and are used as expected.The codebase analysis confirms that both
candidate.Ref
andcandidate.Created
are utilized in thegenerateMeta
function as originally reviewed. Additionally:
candidate.Ref
is used in multiple files, suggesting it's a standard identifier for candidates.candidate.Created
is parsed as a date, indicating it contains timestamp information.To ensure robustness, consider adding runtime checks for the format of these properties, especially
candidate.Created
, to handle potential parsing errors gracefully.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and format of `candidate.Ref` and `candidate.Created`. # Test: Search for the usage of `candidate.Ref`. Expect: Usage in `generateMeta`. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'candidate.Ref' # Test: Search for the usage of `candidate.Created`. Expect: Usage in `generateMeta`. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'candidate.Created'Length of output: 578
12-16
: Verify the existence and usage ofthis.firefish.searchCandidates
.The
getResourceFn
method override assumes thatthis.firefish.searchCandidates
exists and is the correct method to search for candidates. Please ensure that:
- The
this.firefish
object is properly initialized and available in the component's context.- The
searchCandidates
method exists onthis.firefish
and returns the expected results.Run the following script to verify the usage of
this.firefish.searchCandidates
:Verification successful
Verification successful:
this.firefish.searchCandidates
is correctly implemented and used.The
searchCandidates
method is properly defined in thefirefish.app.mjs
file, which serves as the main entry point for the Firefish component. The method is implemented as follows:searchCandidates(opts = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/candidates/search", ...opts, }); }This implementation aligns with the usage seen in the original review comment. The
this.firefish
object is likely an instance of the exported default object infirefish.app.mjs
, which explains whythis.firefish.searchCandidates
is available in the component context.The
getResourceFn
method override in the original code snippet is correct and appropriate:getResourceFn() { return this.firefish.searchCandidates; }This correctly returns the
searchCandidates
method from the Firefish app instance, allowing it to be used for candidate searches as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of `this.firefish.searchCandidates`. # Test: Search for the initialization of `this.firefish`. Expect: Initialization code. rg --type javascript -A 5 $'this\.firefish\s*=' # Test: Search for the usage of `this.firefish.searchCandidates`. Expect: Usage in `getResourceFn`. ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'this.firefish.searchCandidates($_)'Length of output: 726
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further verify the existence and initialization of `this.firefish`. # Test: Search for the initialization of `this.firefish` using ast-grep ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'this.firefish = $_' # Test: Search for imports or requires that might be bringing in the firefish object ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'import $_ from "firefish"' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const $_ = require("firefish")' # Test: Look for any base classes or mixins that might be providing this.firefish ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'class $_ extends $_ { $$$ firefish $$$ }' # Test: Search for the definition of the searchCandidates method ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'searchCandidates($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 811
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broader search for firefish-related code and potential initialization # Test: Search for any mentions of 'firefish' in the codebase rg --type js 'firefish' # Test: Look for potential factory functions or setup code ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function $_($_) { $$$ firefish $$$ }' # Test: Search for 'searchCandidates' method (simplified pattern) ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'searchCandidates' # Test: Look for configuration files that might set up firefish fd -e json -e js -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg 'firefish' # Test: Search for dependency injection or similar patterns ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'inject($_)' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'provide($_)'Length of output: 623
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine the firefish.app.mjs file for the searchCandidates method # Test: Display the contents of firefish.app.mjs cat components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs # Test: Search for searchCandidates method in firefish.app.mjs ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'searchCandidates' components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs # Test: Look for any method definitions in firefish.app.mjs ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern '$_($_) { $$$ }' components/firefish/firefish.app.mjsLength of output: 1854
components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs (6)
8-10
: LGTM!The
_baseUrl
method is implemented correctly and follows the best practice of using a separate method to store the base URL. This improves code readability and maintainability.
11-24
: LGTM!The
_makeRequest
method is implemented correctly and follows the best practices:
- It uses a separate method to make HTTP requests, which improves code readability and maintainability.
- It uses object destructuring and the spread operator to extract options and pass them to the
axios
library, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It correctly sets the
Authorization
header with the OAuth access token from the connected account data.
25-30
: LGTM!The
searchContacts
method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing a search functionality for contacts. It follows the best practices:
- It uses the
_makeRequest
method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It correctly passes the
/contacts/search
path and theopts
object to the_makeRequest
method.
31-36
: LGTM!The
searchCandidates
method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing a search functionality for candidates. It follows the best practices:
- It uses the
_makeRequest
method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It correctly passes the
/candidates/search
path and theopts
object to the_makeRequest
method.
37-45
: LGTM!The
updateContact
method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing an update functionality for contacts. It follows the best practices:
- It uses the
_makeRequest
method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It uses object destructuring to extract the
contactId
and other options from the method arguments, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It correctly passes the
/contacts/${contactId}
path and theopts
object to the_makeRequest
method.
46-53
: LGTM!The
updateCandidate
method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing an update functionality for candidates. It follows the best practices:
- It uses the
_makeRequest
method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It uses object destructuring to extract the
candidateId
and other options from the method arguments, which improves code readability and maintainability.- It correctly passes the
/candidates/${candidateId}
path and theopts
object to the_makeRequest
method.components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs (1)
1-54
: Verify the integration with the Firefish API.The implementation looks good! To ensure the action works as expected, please verify the following:
- The Firefish API endpoints used in the code (
searchContacts
,updateContact
,searchCandidates
,updateCandidate
) are correct and match the API documentation.- The required authentication and permissions are properly set up in the
firefish
prop configuration.- The
- The
EmailMarketing
flag update is sufficient to unsubscribe the contact or candidate from email marketing.Run the following script to verify the integration:
components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs (5)
1-4
: LGTM!The imports and default export are correctly defined.
5-19
: LGTM!The
props
anddeploy
hook are correctly defined.
27-46
: Implement the abstract methods in subclasses.The
processEvent
method is correctly defined and processes the results as expected. However, thegetResourceFn
andgenerateMeta
methods are abstract and need to be implemented by subclasses.Ensure that the
getResourceFn
andgenerateMeta
methods are implemented in all subclasses of this base class.Tools
Biome
[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
47-52
: LGTM!The
getResourceFn
andgenerateMeta
methods are correctly defined as abstract methods.
54-56
: LGTM!The
run
method is correctly defined and calls theprocessEvent
method as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!
Resolves #13811
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
Version Update
0.0.1
to0.1.0
and added new dependencies for enhanced functionality.