Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Components - firefish #13948

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024
Merged

New Components - firefish #13948

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Sep 13, 2024

Resolves #13811

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Added functionality to unsubscribe email addresses from marketing communications.
    • Introduced event sources for new candidate and contact creations, enabling real-time updates.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved API interaction methods for managing contacts and candidates.
    • Standardized event processing framework for better handling of Firefish events.
  • Version Update

    • Updated component version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added new dependencies for enhanced functionality.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream ❌ Failed (Inspect) Sep 13, 2024 6:11pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 13, 2024 6:11pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 13, 2024 6:11pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 13, 2024 6:11pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several enhancements to the Firefish application, including a new action for unsubscribing email addresses from marketing communications, methods for searching and updating contacts and candidates, and the establishment of event sources for new candidates and contacts. Additionally, the package.json is updated to reflect a new version and added dependencies.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs Introduced an action to unsubscribe an email from marketing communications, updating EmailMarketing status for relevant contacts and candidates.
components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs Added methods for API interaction, including _baseUrl(), _makeRequest(), searchContacts(), searchCandidates(), updateContact(), and updateCandidate().
components/firefish/package.json Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added a new dependency on @pipedream/platform.
components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs Established a framework for processing events with methods for deploying and processing events, along with resource and metadata generation.
components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/new-candidate-created.mjs Created a source for emitting events related to new candidate creation, including methods for resource retrieval and metadata generation.
components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs Defined a structured object representing candidate information for managing candidate data.
components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs Created a source for emitting events related to new contact creation, with methods for resource retrieval and metadata generation.
components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs Defined a structured object representing contact information for managing contact data.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Emit new event when a candidate is exported from a saved search (13811) No implementation for exporting candidates.
Emit new event when a contact is exported from a saved search (13811) No implementation for exporting contacts.
Removes a particular contact or candidate from all existing email subscriptions (13811)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ai-assisted

Poem

🐇 In the land of Firefish, changes take flight,
Unsubscribing emails, oh what a delight!
New candidates and contacts, events galore,
With methods and actions, we open the door.
Hopping along, we celebrate this spree,
For every new feature, there's joy, can't you see? 🎉

Tip

OpenAI O1 model for chat
  • We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat.
  • OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model.
  • Please share any feedback with us in the discussions post.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs (1)

17-53: LGTM! Consider adding error handling and a more detailed summary message.

The function correctly searches for contacts and candidates with the given email and updates their EmailMarketing flag to false. It aligns with the PR objective of implementing the unsubscribe-email action.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add error handling for the Firefish API calls to handle potential failures gracefully.
  2. Provide a more detailed summary message, e.g., include the count of updated contacts and candidates.
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b463601 and 688c62a.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (8)
  • components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/firefish/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/new-candidate-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs

[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

Additional comments not posted (22)
components/firefish/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM!

The version update to 0.1.0 is appropriate for introducing new functionality. The addition of the @pipedream/platform dependency with a reasonable version constraint is a good practice. It will likely provide useful utilities for building Pipedream components.

Also applies to: 15-17

components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/test-event.mjs (1)

1-20: LGTM! The test event payload looks good.

The exported object contains relevant properties for a contact, such as:

  • Basic info: Ref, FirstName, Surname, Title
  • Company info: CompanyRef, CompanyName, JobTitle
  • Contact info: EmailAddress, MobileNumber, WorkNumber
  • Metadata: IsArchived, CreatedBy, Created, UpdatedBy, Updated
  • Last action info: LastActionRef, LastActionName, LastActionDate

The property names are clear and self-explanatory. The values appear to be appropriately mocked for testing purposes.

Having a well-structured test event payload is beneficial for testing the component and serving as documentation for the expected event structure.

components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs (2)

1-28: LGTM! The test event payload structure aligns with the expected candidate attributes.

The exported object in this file serves as a well-structured test event payload for the new-candidate-created source component. The property names and data types align with the expected candidate attributes mentioned in the PR objectives.


5-5: Verify if the null value for DateOfBirth is intentional.

The DateOfBirth property is set to null in this test event payload. Please confirm if this is intentional, considering that the date of birth may not always be available or required for candidate records in Firefish.

To verify if null is a valid value for DateOfBirth, you can run the following script:

Verification successful

null value for DateOfBirth is intentional and consistent with other integrations

The null value for DateOfBirth in the test event is intentional and aligns with common practices across various integrations in the codebase. Other integrations, such as Deputy, also use null for DateOfBirth in their test events. This suggests that null is a valid and expected value for this field when the date of birth is not available or not provided.

  • Found in components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/test-event.mjs: "DateOfBirth": null,
  • Similar usage in Deputy integration: components/deputy/sources/new-timesheet-saved/test-event.mjs and components/deputy/sources/new-colleague-created/test-event.mjs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `DateOfBirth` can be `null` in the Firefish API documentation.

# Test: Search for `DateOfBirth` in the Firefish API documentation. 
# Expect: Find information confirming that `null` is a valid value.
rg --type markdown -A 5 $'DateOfBirth' $(fd -e md -d 1 firefish)

Length of output: 63


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for DateOfBirth usage in Firefish integration files
echo "Searching for DateOfBirth usage in Firefish integration files:"
rg -i "DateOfBirth" $(fd -e js -e mjs -e ts firefish)

echo -e "\nSearching for test files or sample data related to candidate creation:"
fd -e js -e mjs -e ts -e json firefish | rg -i "test|sample|mock|fixture" | xargs rg -i "DateOfBirth"

echo -e "\nSearching for comments or inline documentation about DateOfBirth:"
rg -i "DateOfBirth" $(fd -e js -e mjs -e ts firefish) -C 3 | rg "//|/\*|\*"

Length of output: 4246

components/firefish/sources/new-contact-created/new-contact-created.mjs (1)

1-26: LGTM!

The new source component "New Contact Created" is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objectives. The component follows the expected structure, imports the necessary modules, and overrides the required methods appropriately.

The getResourceFn method correctly returns the searchContacts function from the firefish object, and the generateMeta method constructs the event metadata as expected, using the contact ID, a summary, and a timestamp derived from the contact's creation date.

The component is properly configured with the necessary properties, promoting code reuse and consistency by importing and using the common base configuration and sample emit module.

Overall, the implementation looks good and is ready to be merged.

components/firefish/sources/new-candidate-created/new-candidate-created.mjs (5)

1-3: LGTM!

The imports are correctly set up, inheriting common functionality and providing a sample event for testing. The file paths are valid, assuming the referenced files exist at the specified locations.


4-11: LGTM!

The metadata for the new source component is properly defined, with appropriate values for properties like key, name, description, version, type, and dedupe. The included documentation link in the description is a nice touch for guiding users. The dedupe strategy of "unique" is suitable for emitting events with distinct IDs.


25-25: LGTM!

Including the sampleEmit property with the imported sample event is a good practice for facilitating testing of the component. It provides a representative event payload that can be used to verify the component's behavior.


17-23: Verify the existence and format of candidate.Ref and candidate.Created.

The generateMeta method assumes that the candidate object has Ref and Created properties with the expected formats. Please ensure that:

  1. The Ref property exists on the candidate object and contains a unique identifier for the candidate.
  2. The Created property exists on the candidate object and contains a valid date string that can be parsed by Date.parse.

Run the following script to verify the structure of the candidate object:

Verification successful

Verified: candidate.Ref and candidate.Created properties exist and are used as expected.

The codebase analysis confirms that both candidate.Ref and candidate.Created are utilized in the generateMeta function as originally reviewed. Additionally:

  • candidate.Ref is used in multiple files, suggesting it's a standard identifier for candidates.
  • candidate.Created is parsed as a date, indicating it contains timestamp information.

To ensure robustness, consider adding runtime checks for the format of these properties, especially candidate.Created, to handle potential parsing errors gracefully.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and format of `candidate.Ref` and `candidate.Created`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `candidate.Ref`. Expect: Usage in `generateMeta`.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'candidate.Ref'

# Test: Search for the usage of `candidate.Created`. Expect: Usage in `generateMeta`.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'candidate.Created'

Length of output: 578


12-16: Verify the existence and usage of this.firefish.searchCandidates.

The getResourceFn method override assumes that this.firefish.searchCandidates exists and is the correct method to search for candidates. Please ensure that:

  1. The this.firefish object is properly initialized and available in the component's context.
  2. The searchCandidates method exists on this.firefish and returns the expected results.

Run the following script to verify the usage of this.firefish.searchCandidates:

Verification successful

Verification successful: this.firefish.searchCandidates is correctly implemented and used.

The searchCandidates method is properly defined in the firefish.app.mjs file, which serves as the main entry point for the Firefish component. The method is implemented as follows:

searchCandidates(opts = {}) {
  return this._makeRequest({
    path: "/candidates/search",
    ...opts,
  });
}

This implementation aligns with the usage seen in the original review comment. The this.firefish object is likely an instance of the exported default object in firefish.app.mjs, which explains why this.firefish.searchCandidates is available in the component context.

The getResourceFn method override in the original code snippet is correct and appropriate:

getResourceFn() {
  return this.firefish.searchCandidates;
}

This correctly returns the searchCandidates method from the Firefish app instance, allowing it to be used for candidate searches as intended.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and usage of `this.firefish.searchCandidates`.

# Test: Search for the initialization of `this.firefish`. Expect: Initialization code.
rg --type javascript -A 5 $'this\.firefish\s*='

# Test: Search for the usage of `this.firefish.searchCandidates`. Expect: Usage in `getResourceFn`.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'this.firefish.searchCandidates($_)'

Length of output: 726


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further verify the existence and initialization of `this.firefish`.

# Test: Search for the initialization of `this.firefish` using ast-grep
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'this.firefish = $_'

# Test: Search for imports or requires that might be bringing in the firefish object
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'import $_ from "firefish"'
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const $_ = require("firefish")'

# Test: Look for any base classes or mixins that might be providing this.firefish
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'class $_ extends $_ {
  $$$
  firefish
  $$$
}'

# Test: Search for the definition of the searchCandidates method
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'searchCandidates($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 811


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broader search for firefish-related code and potential initialization

# Test: Search for any mentions of 'firefish' in the codebase
rg --type js 'firefish'

# Test: Look for potential factory functions or setup code
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function $_($_) {
  $$$
  firefish
  $$$
}'

# Test: Search for 'searchCandidates' method (simplified pattern)
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'searchCandidates'

# Test: Look for configuration files that might set up firefish
fd -e json -e js -e yaml -e yml | xargs rg 'firefish'

# Test: Search for dependency injection or similar patterns
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'inject($_)'
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'provide($_)'

Length of output: 623


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the firefish.app.mjs file for the searchCandidates method

# Test: Display the contents of firefish.app.mjs
cat components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs

# Test: Search for searchCandidates method in firefish.app.mjs
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'searchCandidates' components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs

# Test: Look for any method definitions in firefish.app.mjs
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern '$_($_) {
  $$$
}' components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs

Length of output: 1854

components/firefish/firefish.app.mjs (6)

8-10: LGTM!

The _baseUrl method is implemented correctly and follows the best practice of using a separate method to store the base URL. This improves code readability and maintainability.


11-24: LGTM!

The _makeRequest method is implemented correctly and follows the best practices:

  • It uses a separate method to make HTTP requests, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It uses object destructuring and the spread operator to extract options and pass them to the axios library, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It correctly sets the Authorization header with the OAuth access token from the connected account data.

25-30: LGTM!

The searchContacts method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing a search functionality for contacts. It follows the best practices:

  • It uses the _makeRequest method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It correctly passes the /contacts/search path and the opts object to the _makeRequest method.

31-36: LGTM!

The searchCandidates method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing a search functionality for candidates. It follows the best practices:

  • It uses the _makeRequest method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It correctly passes the /candidates/search path and the opts object to the _makeRequest method.

37-45: LGTM!

The updateContact method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing an update functionality for contacts. It follows the best practices:

  • It uses the _makeRequest method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It uses object destructuring to extract the contactId and other options from the method arguments, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It correctly passes the /contacts/${contactId} path and the opts object to the _makeRequest method.

46-53: LGTM!

The updateCandidate method is implemented correctly and aligns with the PR objective of implementing an update functionality for candidates. It follows the best practices:

  • It uses the _makeRequest method to make the HTTP request, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It uses object destructuring to extract the candidateId and other options from the method arguments, which improves code readability and maintainability.
  • It correctly passes the /candidates/${candidateId} path and the opts object to the _makeRequest method.
components/firefish/actions/unsubscribe-email/unsubscribe-email.mjs (1)

1-54: Verify the integration with the Firefish API.

The implementation looks good! To ensure the action works as expected, please verify the following:

  1. The Firefish API endpoints used in the code (searchContacts, updateContact, searchCandidates, updateCandidate) are correct and match the API documentation.
  2. The required authentication and permissions are properly set up in the firefish prop configuration.
  3. The email prop is correctly passed to the API calls.
  4. The EmailMarketing flag update is sufficient to unsubscribe the contact or candidate from email marketing.

Run the following script to verify the integration:

components/firefish/sources/common/base.mjs (5)

1-4: LGTM!

The imports and default export are correctly defined.


5-19: LGTM!

The props and deploy hook are correctly defined.


27-46: Implement the abstract methods in subclasses.

The processEvent method is correctly defined and processes the results as expected. However, the getResourceFn and generateMeta methods are abstract and need to be implemented by subclasses.

Ensure that the getResourceFn and generateMeta methods are implemented in all subclasses of this base class.

Tools
Biome

[error] 32-32: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)


47-52: LGTM!

The getResourceFn and generateMeta methods are correctly defined as abstract methods.


54-56: LGTM!

The run method is correctly defined and calls the processEvent method as expected.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jcortes jcortes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 3d6759a into master Sep 16, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-13811 branch September 16, 2024 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] firefish
2 participants