-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Components - offlight #14064
New Components - offlight #14064
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to the Offlight application, including a new action for creating tasks, methods for API interactions, and a source component for task completion events. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Task Done (Instant) Actions - Create Task
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/offlight/package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-19
: Consider adding more descriptive information about new components.The package.json file structure is correct and follows npm standards. However, to improve discoverability and provide more context about the new Offlight components, consider adding the following:
- Update the "description" field to mention the new webhook source and action.
- Add "webhook" and "task-management" to the "keywords" array.
Here's a suggested diff:
{ "name": "@pipedream/offlight", "version": "0.1.0", - "description": "Pipedream OFFLIGHT Components", + "description": "Pipedream OFFLIGHT Components including webhook source for completed tasks and task creation action", "main": "offlight.app.mjs", "keywords": [ "pipedream", - "offlight" + "offlight", + "webhook", + "task-management" ], "homepage": "https://pipedream.com/apps/offlight", "author": "Pipedream <[email protected]> (https://pipedream.com/)", "publishConfig": { "access": "public" }, "dependencies": { "@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.1" } }components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-18
: LGTM! Consider adding a descriptive comment.The object structure aligns well with the PR objectives for the "new-task-done-instant" webhook source. The properties and their values are consistent and appropriate for representing a completed task event.
Consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file to explain the purpose of this test event object. For example:
// Test event object representing a completed task for the new-task-done-instant webhook source export default { // ... (existing code) }components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs (3)
11-17
: LGTM: Props are correctly defined, but consider adding prop descriptions.The props for the Offlight API, HTTP interface, and database service are correctly defined. However, to improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding descriptions for each prop.
You could add descriptions like this:
props: { offlight: { type: "app", app: "offlight", description: "Offlight app instance for API access", }, http: { type: "$.interface.http", description: "HTTP interface for webhook functionality", }, db: { type: "$.service.db", description: "Database service for storing component state", }, },
18-26
: LGTM: emitTask method is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.The
emitTask
method correctly emits an event with the task details. However, to improve robustness, consider adding error handling.You could add error handling like this:
methods: { emitTask(task) { try { if (!task || !task.id || !task.name || !task.doneAt) { throw new Error("Invalid task object"); } this.$emit(task, { id: task.id, summary: `Task ${task.name} marked as done`, ts: Date.parse(task.doneAt), }); } catch (error) { console.error("Error emitting task:", error); // Optionally, you could re-throw the error or handle it in a different way } }, },
51-55
: LGTM: Run method and sampleEmit are correctly implemented, but consider adding validation.The
run
method andsampleEmit
assignment are correctly implemented. However, consider adding input validation to therun
method.You could improve the
run
method like this:async run({ body }) { if (!body || typeof body !== 'object') { throw new Error('Invalid webhook payload'); } await this.emitTask(body); },This ensures that the incoming webhook payload is a valid object before processing it.
components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (1)
9-46
: Props definition looks good, with a minor suggestion.The props are well-defined and align with the PR objectives. All required and optional fields are correctly implemented.
Consider adding a pattern validation for the
taskDeadline
prop to ensure it matches the ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD). This can prevent potential issues with incorrect date formats. Here's a suggested addition:taskDeadline: { type: "string", label: "Task Deadline", description: "The deadline of the task. **In ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD)**.", optional: true, + pattern: "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$", + errorMessage: "Invalid date format. Please use YYYY-MM-DD.", },
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
- components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/offlight/offlight.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/offlight/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
components/offlight/package.json (2)
3-3
: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly indicates a minor release, which aligns with the integration of new components for the Offlight service as mentioned in the PR objectives.
15-17
: Dependency addition looks good, but needs verification.The addition of the @pipedream/platform dependency is appropriate for implementing new components. However, please verify that this dependency is sufficient for implementing the "new-task-done-instant" webhook source and the "create-task" action mentioned in the PR objectives.
To ensure all necessary dependencies are included, please run the following script:
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
2-5
: Verify the use of future dates in timestamps.The timestamp properties (createdAt, updatedAt, doneAt) are set to dates in 2024, which is in the future relative to the current date. While this might be intentional for testing purposes, it's important to ensure that the actual implementation can handle future dates correctly.
Please confirm if using future dates is intentional for this test event. If not, consider updating the timestamps to use current or past dates to more accurately reflect real-world scenarios.
8-17
: Clarify the 'source' property and consider documenting null properties.
The task name "🤵 Welcome to OFFLIGHT" includes an emoji. Ensure that systems processing this data can handle emojis correctly.
The 'source' property is set to "admin", which wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives. Could you clarify the purpose and possible values for this property?
Several properties (note, deadline, goal, identifier, sourceName, link, creator) are set to null. This aligns with the optional properties mentioned in the PR objectives for the create-task action. Consider adding a comment to explain which properties are optional and under what circumstances they might have values.
Please provide more information about the 'source' property and confirm if the null values for optional properties are correctly represented in this test event.
components/offlight/offlight.app.mjs (4)
10-14
: LGTM! Headers are correctly set up.The
_headers
method properly sets up the headers for API requests, including the API key from the authentication data. The use of a private method for this purpose is a good practice.
31-37
: LGTM! Method correctly retrieves completed tasks.The
getDoneTasks
method properly implements the functionality to retrieve completed tasks, which aligns with the PR objective for handling the webhook for completed tasks. It correctly uses the_makeRequest
method with the appropriate HTTP method and path.
45-50
: LGTM! Method correctly implements webhook deletion.The
deleteWebhook
method properly implements the functionality to delete a webhook. This is a necessary feature for managing webhooks and complements thecreateWebhook
method. It correctly uses the_makeRequest
method with the appropriate HTTP method and path.
1-53
: Overall, great implementation of the Offlight API integration!The changes in this file successfully implement the Offlight API integration as per the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, with good abstraction and reuse of methods. It provides functionality for creating tasks, retrieving completed tasks, and managing webhooks.
Some minor improvements have been suggested in the individual method reviews, mainly around error handling and input validation. These suggestions, if implemented, would further enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the integration.
Great job on this implementation!
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs (3)
1-2
: LGTM: Imports are appropriate for the component's functionality.The imports for the Offlight app and the sample emit function are relevant and correctly implemented.
4-10
: LGTM: Component metadata is well-defined.The component's metadata is appropriately set, including a descriptive key, name, and description. The version "0.0.1" is correct for a new component, and the
dedupe
property is correctly set to "unique" to prevent duplicate event processing.
1-55
: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.The
new-task-done-instant.mjs
file successfully implements the webhook source for new completed tasks in the Offlight service, as outlined in the PR objectives. Key points:
- The component correctly implements the
new-task-done-instant
webhook source.- It includes methods for deploying, activating, and deactivating the webhook.
- The component emits events with task details when tasks are marked as complete.
The implementation aligns well with the requirements specified in issue #14052. However, to fully meet the objectives, ensure that:
- The webhook creation in the
activate
hook includes all necessary properties as per the Offlight API documentation.- The
run
method correctly handles all possible task properties mentioned in the issue (task name, note, deadline, identifier, source name, and source link).To ensure all required properties are handled, please run the following script:
This will help confirm that the
emitTask
method is handling all the necessary task properties.components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (3)
1-8
: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.The import statement and action metadata are well-structured and align with the PR objectives. The inclusion of a documentation link in the description is a good practice for user reference.
47-50
: LGTM: Run method signature and setup are correct.The async run method is properly defined, and the initial setup for calling the
createTask
method looks good. The use of the$
parameter is consistent with platform conventions.
1-63
: Overall, the implementation looks good with room for minor improvements.The "Create Task" action is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives and linked issue requirements. The code structure is clean and follows good practices. Consider implementing the suggested improvements for data validation, error handling, and prop pattern validation to enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the action.
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left one comment about the source functionality, and another regarding a description.
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Resolves #14052.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Version Update
These updates enhance task management capabilities and improve user experience within the Offlight application.