Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Components - offlight #14064

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024
Merged

New Components - offlight #14064

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

luancazarine
Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine commented Sep 23, 2024

Resolves #14052.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a "Create Task" action for initiating task creation with customizable parameters.
    • Added a new source component that emits events when tasks are marked as complete.
    • Enhanced API interaction with new methods for creating tasks, retrieving completed tasks, and managing webhooks.
  • Version Update

    • Updated the application version to 0.1.0, reflecting the new features and improvements.

These updates enhance task management capabilities and improve user experience within the Offlight application.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 23, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Sep 24, 2024 7:31pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 24, 2024 7:31pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Sep 24, 2024 7:31pm

@luancazarine luancazarine added the ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification label Sep 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several enhancements to the Offlight application, including a new action for creating tasks, methods for API interactions, and a source component for task completion events. The create-task action allows users to initiate tasks with various parameters. New methods streamline API requests, and a source component emits events when tasks are marked as complete, facilitating real-time updates.

Changes

Files Change Summary
components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs Added a new action Create Task to initiate task creation with various parameters.
components/offlight/offlight.app.mjs Introduced multiple new methods for API interaction, including createTask, getDoneTasks, createWebhook, and deleteWebhook. Removed propDefinitions.
components/offlight/package.json Updated version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added a dependency on @pipedream/platform.
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs Created a new source component to emit events when tasks are completed, including methods for deployment and activation.
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs Introduced a module representing a task event with various metadata properties.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Initiates the creation of a new task in Offlight (Issue #14052)
Emits new event when a task is marked as complete (Issue #14052)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

🐇 In the garden, tasks take flight,
With new actions shining bright.
Events that dance when tasks are done,
Offlight's features, oh what fun!
Create and track, a joyful spree,
Hopping forward, come see with glee! 🌼


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25ab142 and 0286104.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sources
 - New Task Done (Instant)

Actions
 - Create Task
@luancazarine luancazarine marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 20:21
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/offlight/package.json (1)

Line range hint 1-19: Consider adding more descriptive information about new components.

The package.json file structure is correct and follows npm standards. However, to improve discoverability and provide more context about the new Offlight components, consider adding the following:

  1. Update the "description" field to mention the new webhook source and action.
  2. Add "webhook" and "task-management" to the "keywords" array.

Here's a suggested diff:

 {
   "name": "@pipedream/offlight",
   "version": "0.1.0",
-  "description": "Pipedream OFFLIGHT Components",
+  "description": "Pipedream OFFLIGHT Components including webhook source for completed tasks and task creation action",
   "main": "offlight.app.mjs",
   "keywords": [
     "pipedream",
-    "offlight"
+    "offlight",
+    "webhook",
+    "task-management"
   ],
   "homepage": "https://pipedream.com/apps/offlight",
   "author": "Pipedream <[email protected]> (https://pipedream.com/)",
   "publishConfig": {
     "access": "public"
   },
   "dependencies": {
     "@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.1"
   }
 }
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs (1)

1-18: LGTM! Consider adding a descriptive comment.

The object structure aligns well with the PR objectives for the "new-task-done-instant" webhook source. The properties and their values are consistent and appropriate for representing a completed task event.

Consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file to explain the purpose of this test event object. For example:

// Test event object representing a completed task for the new-task-done-instant webhook source
export default {
  // ... (existing code)
}
components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs (3)

11-17: LGTM: Props are correctly defined, but consider adding prop descriptions.

The props for the Offlight API, HTTP interface, and database service are correctly defined. However, to improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding descriptions for each prop.

You could add descriptions like this:

props: {
  offlight: {
    type: "app",
    app: "offlight",
    description: "Offlight app instance for API access",
  },
  http: {
    type: "$.interface.http",
    description: "HTTP interface for webhook functionality",
  },
  db: {
    type: "$.service.db",
    description: "Database service for storing component state",
  },
},

18-26: LGTM: emitTask method is well-implemented, but consider adding error handling.

The emitTask method correctly emits an event with the task details. However, to improve robustness, consider adding error handling.

You could add error handling like this:

methods: {
  emitTask(task) {
    try {
      if (!task || !task.id || !task.name || !task.doneAt) {
        throw new Error("Invalid task object");
      }
      this.$emit(task, {
        id: task.id,
        summary: `Task ${task.name} marked as done`,
        ts: Date.parse(task.doneAt),
      });
    } catch (error) {
      console.error("Error emitting task:", error);
      // Optionally, you could re-throw the error or handle it in a different way
    }
  },
},

51-55: LGTM: Run method and sampleEmit are correctly implemented, but consider adding validation.

The run method and sampleEmit assignment are correctly implemented. However, consider adding input validation to the run method.

You could improve the run method like this:

async run({ body }) {
  if (!body || typeof body !== 'object') {
    throw new Error('Invalid webhook payload');
  }
  await this.emitTask(body);
},

This ensures that the incoming webhook payload is a valid object before processing it.

components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (1)

9-46: Props definition looks good, with a minor suggestion.

The props are well-defined and align with the PR objectives. All required and optional fields are correctly implemented.

Consider adding a pattern validation for the taskDeadline prop to ensure it matches the ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD). This can prevent potential issues with incorrect date formats. Here's a suggested addition:

 taskDeadline: {
   type: "string",
   label: "Task Deadline",
   description: "The deadline of the task. **In ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD)**.",
   optional: true,
+  pattern: "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}$",
+  errorMessage: "Invalid date format. Please use YYYY-MM-DD.",
 },
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a7ab4f and 25ab142.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
  • components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/offlight/offlight.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/offlight/package.json (2 hunks)
  • components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
components/offlight/package.json (2)

3-3: Version update looks good.

The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly indicates a minor release, which aligns with the integration of new components for the Offlight service as mentioned in the PR objectives.


15-17: Dependency addition looks good, but needs verification.

The addition of the @pipedream/platform dependency is appropriate for implementing new components. However, please verify that this dependency is sufficient for implementing the "new-task-done-instant" webhook source and the "create-task" action mentioned in the PR objectives.

To ensure all necessary dependencies are included, please run the following script:

components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/test-event.mjs (2)

2-5: Verify the use of future dates in timestamps.

The timestamp properties (createdAt, updatedAt, doneAt) are set to dates in 2024, which is in the future relative to the current date. While this might be intentional for testing purposes, it's important to ensure that the actual implementation can handle future dates correctly.

Please confirm if using future dates is intentional for this test event. If not, consider updating the timestamps to use current or past dates to more accurately reflect real-world scenarios.


8-17: Clarify the 'source' property and consider documenting null properties.

  1. The task name "🤵 Welcome to OFFLIGHT" includes an emoji. Ensure that systems processing this data can handle emojis correctly.

  2. The 'source' property is set to "admin", which wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives. Could you clarify the purpose and possible values for this property?

  3. Several properties (note, deadline, goal, identifier, sourceName, link, creator) are set to null. This aligns with the optional properties mentioned in the PR objectives for the create-task action. Consider adding a comment to explain which properties are optional and under what circumstances they might have values.

Please provide more information about the 'source' property and confirm if the null values for optional properties are correctly represented in this test event.

components/offlight/offlight.app.mjs (4)

10-14: LGTM! Headers are correctly set up.

The _headers method properly sets up the headers for API requests, including the API key from the authentication data. The use of a private method for this purpose is a good practice.


31-37: LGTM! Method correctly retrieves completed tasks.

The getDoneTasks method properly implements the functionality to retrieve completed tasks, which aligns with the PR objective for handling the webhook for completed tasks. It correctly uses the _makeRequest method with the appropriate HTTP method and path.


45-50: LGTM! Method correctly implements webhook deletion.

The deleteWebhook method properly implements the functionality to delete a webhook. This is a necessary feature for managing webhooks and complements the createWebhook method. It correctly uses the _makeRequest method with the appropriate HTTP method and path.


1-53: Overall, great implementation of the Offlight API integration!

The changes in this file successfully implement the Offlight API integration as per the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, with good abstraction and reuse of methods. It provides functionality for creating tasks, retrieving completed tasks, and managing webhooks.

Some minor improvements have been suggested in the individual method reviews, mainly around error handling and input validation. These suggestions, if implemented, would further enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the integration.

Great job on this implementation!

components/offlight/sources/new-task-done-instant/new-task-done-instant.mjs (3)

1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate for the component's functionality.

The imports for the Offlight app and the sample emit function are relevant and correctly implemented.


4-10: LGTM: Component metadata is well-defined.

The component's metadata is appropriately set, including a descriptive key, name, and description. The version "0.0.1" is correct for a new component, and the dedupe property is correctly set to "unique" to prevent duplicate event processing.


1-55: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.

The new-task-done-instant.mjs file successfully implements the webhook source for new completed tasks in the Offlight service, as outlined in the PR objectives. Key points:

  1. The component correctly implements the new-task-done-instant webhook source.
  2. It includes methods for deploying, activating, and deactivating the webhook.
  3. The component emits events with task details when tasks are marked as complete.

The implementation aligns well with the requirements specified in issue #14052. However, to fully meet the objectives, ensure that:

  1. The webhook creation in the activate hook includes all necessary properties as per the Offlight API documentation.
  2. The run method correctly handles all possible task properties mentioned in the issue (task name, note, deadline, identifier, source name, and source link).

To ensure all required properties are handled, please run the following script:

This will help confirm that the emitTask method is handling all the necessary task properties.

components/offlight/actions/create-task/create-task.mjs (3)

1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.

The import statement and action metadata are well-structured and align with the PR objectives. The inclusion of a documentation link in the description is a good practice for user reference.


47-50: LGTM: Run method signature and setup are correct.

The async run method is properly defined, and the initial setup for calling the createTask method looks good. The use of the $ parameter is consistent with platform conventions.


1-63: Overall, the implementation looks good with room for minor improvements.

The "Create Task" action is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives and linked issue requirements. The code structure is clean and follows good practices. Consider implementing the suggested improvements for data validation, error handling, and prop pattern validation to enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of the action.

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left one comment about the source functionality, and another regarding a description.

Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ai-assisted Content generated by AI, with human refinement and modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] offlight
2 participants