[Components] OnlineCheckWriter: New action components #14119
Conversation
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new actions to the Online Check Writer application, including functionalities for creating checks, email checks, mail checks, and payees, as well as mailing PDF documents. Each action is defined with specific properties and methods to handle API requests, enhancing the application's capabilities for check management and document handling. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs (2)
30-37: Improve clarity of payeePhone prop descriptionThe current description for the payeePhone prop could be clearer. Consider rephrasing it to improve readability and understanding.
Suggested change:
- description: "Required if **Enable SMS Inform** is `true` and not exist any phone on associated payee,", + description: "Required if **Enable SMS Inform** is `true` and no phone number exists for the associated payee.",
79-80: Enhance summary message with specific informationThe current summary message is generic and doesn't provide information about the number of checks created or any other specific details.
Consider updating the summary message to include more specific information:
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully created email checks."); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created ${response.data.length} email check(s).`);This assumes that the API response includes an array of created checks in the
dataproperty. Adjust accordingly based on the actual API response structure.components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-check/create-check.mjs (3)
1-8: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The import statement and action metadata look good. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is excellent.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what the action does before the documentation link. For example:
- description: "Creates a new check. [See the documentation](https://apiv3.onlinecheckwriter.com/#211cb6e4-bda7-46de-9e84-a5e8b2709206)", + description: "Creates a new check with specified details such as bank account, payee, amount, and other optional parameters. [See the documentation](https://apiv3.onlinecheckwriter.com/#211cb6e4-bda7-46de-9e84-a5e8b2709206)",
9-83: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity.The props definition is comprehensive and aligns well with the requirements for creating a check. Using
propDefinitionfor all props ensures consistency and reusability.Consider grouping related props with comments for better readability. For example:
props: { app, // Check details bankAccountId: { propDefinition: [app, "bankAccountId"], }, payeeId: { propDefinition: [app, "payeeId"], }, amount: { propDefinition: [app, "amount"], }, // Additional information categoryId: { propDefinition: [app, "categoryId"], }, issueDate: { propDefinition: [app, "issueDate"], }, memo: { propDefinition: [app, "memo"], }, // ... (other props) // Flags noSign: { propDefinition: [app, "noSign"], }, // ... (other flag props) },
92-133: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The
runmethod is well-implemented, correctly using all defined props and calling thecreateChecksmethod with the appropriate data structure. The summary export provides useful feedback to the user.Consider adding error handling to provide more informative feedback in case of API errors. For example:
async run({ $ }) { // ... (existing destructuring) try { const response = await createChecks({ $, data: { checks: [ { // ... (existing check object) }, ], }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created a new check with ID \`${response.data.checks[0].checkId}\`.`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create check: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-payee/create-payee.mjs (2)
9-70: Props definition looks good, consider adding input validation.The props are well-defined and align with the API requirements. The 'name' prop is correctly set as required, while others are optional. Descriptions are clear and concise.
Consider adding input validation for email and phone number props to ensure data integrity before sending to the API. For example:
email: { type: "string", label: "Email", description: "The email of the payee.", optional: true, pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$", }, phone: { type: "string", label: "Phone", description: "The phone number of the payee.", optional: true, pattern: "^\\+?[1-9]\\d{1,14}$", },
79-116: Run method looks good, consider data privacy.The
runmethod is well-implemented, using async/await for the API call and including all payee properties in the request data. The summary export provides good user feedback.Consider filtering the response data before returning it to ensure no sensitive information is unintentionally exposed. For example:
const { payeeId, name, email } = response.data.payees[0]; $.export("$summary", `Successfully created payee with ID \`${payeeId}\`.`); return { payeeId, name, email };components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/mail-pdf-document/mail-pdf-document.mjs (3)
6-135: LGTM: Action definition and props are well-structured.The action definition and props are comprehensive and align with the API requirements. Props are well-defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions.
Consider adding validation for the
destinationStateprop to ensure it's exactly 2 characters long, as mentioned in the description. You can use thepatternproperty for this:destinationState: { type: "string", label: "Destination State", description: "The state of the recipient. Use 2 characters Eg. `Tx` instead of `Texas` for example.", pattern: "^[A-Za-z]{2}$", },
144-205: LGTM: The run function is well-implemented with proper error handling and data preparation.The function correctly handles async operations, validates input, and prepares the request payload using FormData. It includes all required and optional fields in the request.
Consider the following improvements:
- Use object shorthand notation for better readability:
const data = new FormData(); data.append("document_details[file]", file); data.append("document_details[title]", documentTitle); data.append("shipping[shippingTypeId]", shippingTypeId); // ... (append other fields similarly)
- Consider creating a helper function to append data to FormData, reducing repetition:
const appendIfDefined = (form, key, value) => { if (value !== undefined) { form.append(key, value); } }; // Usage appendIfDefined(data, "document_details[title]", documentTitle); appendIfDefined(data, "shipping[shippingTypeId]", shippingTypeId); // ... (append other fields similarly)
- Add more detailed error handling for the API response:
const response = await mailPdfDocument({ $, data, headers: data.getHeaders(), }); if (response.status !== "success") { throw new Error(`Failed to mail PDF document: ${response.message}`); } $.export("$summary", `Successfully generated and mailed PDF document. Document ID: ${response.documentId}`); return response;
1-206: Overall, the implementation successfully meets the PR objectives.The "Mail PDF Document" action is well-implemented and aligns with the requirements specified in issue #14067. The code is structured logically, handles required and optional fields appropriately, and includes necessary error checking.
To further improve the implementation:
Consider adding unit tests to ensure the action behaves correctly under various scenarios, including edge cases.
Implement proper logging throughout the action to aid in debugging and monitoring.
Consider adding a rate limiting mechanism or integrating with an existing one to prevent API abuse.
Document any assumptions made about the API's behavior or limitations in the code comments or README file.
These improvements will enhance the robustness and maintainability of the action.
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs (1)
46-46: Redundant 'optional: false' in 'shippingTypeId' prop definitionThe
optionalproperty defaults tofalse, so explicitly settingoptional: falseis unnecessary.You can simplify the code by removing the redundant property:
shippingTypeId: { - optional: false, description: "The shipping type ID of the check.", propDefinition: [ app, "shippingTypeId", ], },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-check/create-check.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-payee/create-payee.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/mail-pdf-document/mail-pdf-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/onlinecheckwriter.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/package.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
components/onlinecheckwriter/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for the introduction of new action components. This change adheres to semantic versioning principles.
Line range hint
1-19: Overall, the package.json changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The version update and new dependencies are appropriate for introducing new action components for OnlineCheckWriter. As you proceed with the implementation, please ensure that all the action components mentioned in the PR objectives (create-check, mail-pdf-document, create-payee, create-email-check, and create-mail-check) are properly implemented and utilize these dependencies as needed.
15-18: New dependencies look appropriate.The addition of @pipedream/platform (3.0.3) and form-data (^4.0.0) seems suitable for the new action components. The specific version for @pipedream/platform ensures consistency, while the flexible versioning for form-data allows for compatible updates.
To ensure these dependencies are necessary and used in the new action components, please run the following script:
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs (3)
45-52: LGTM: createEmailChecks methodThe
createEmailChecksmethod is well-implemented. It provides a clean interface to the API endpoint and allows for flexibility with additional arguments.
1-82: Overall review summaryThe implementation of the "Create Email Check" action is generally well-structured and aligns with the objectives specified in the linked issue. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:
- The action key and name should be consistent in terms of creating a single check or multiple checks.
- The
payeePhoneprop description could be clearer.- The
sendAttachmentprop type and its usage in therunmethod should be reviewed to ensure consistency with API expectations.- The implementation currently creates only a single check, which may not align with the action key suggesting multiple checks.
- The summary message could be more informative by including specific details about the created check(s).
Addressing these points will enhance the overall quality and clarity of the component. Great job on implementing this new action!
38-43: Reconsider type conversion for sendAttachmentThe
sendAttachmentprop is defined as a boolean, but in therunmethod, it's converted to a number using the unary plus operator. This conversion might be unnecessary and could potentially lead to confusion.Could you clarify if the API expects a boolean or a number for the
sendAttachmentparameter? If it expects a boolean, we can simplify the code by removing the type conversion.To verify the API expectations, you can run the following script:
If the API indeed expects a number, we should update the prop type to match:
sendAttachment: { - type: "boolean", + type: "integer", label: "Send Attachment", - description: "This will send added attachments along with the check.", + description: "Set to 1 to send added attachments along with the check, 0 otherwise.", optional: true, },Also applies to: 72-74
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-check/create-check.mjs (2)
84-91: LGTM! The createChecks method is well-implemented.The
createChecksmethod is correctly defined and uses theapp.postmethod to send a request to the "/checks" endpoint. The use of the spread operator forargsprovides flexibility for additional parameters.
1-134: Great implementation of the "Create Check" action!The overall implementation of the "Create Check" action is well-structured and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It covers all necessary functionality, including the required and optional props as specified in the linked issue #14067.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive prop definitions using
propDefinitionfor consistency.- Well-implemented
createChecksmethod for API interaction.- Proper handling of all check creation parameters in the
runmethod.- Clear and informative summary export for user feedback.
The minor suggestions provided in the previous comments (enhancing the description, adding prop grouping comments, and implementing error handling) would further improve the code's clarity and robustness.
Great job on this implementation!
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-payee/create-payee.mjs (3)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.The import statement and action metadata are well-defined. The description includes a link to the API documentation, which is helpful for users. The version "0.0.1" is appropriate for a new component.
71-78: LGTM: createPayees method is well-implemented.The
createPayeesmethod is concise and correctly utilizes the app's post method. The use of the spread operator forargsprovides flexibility for passing additional parameters if needed.
1-117: Overall implementation is solid and meets PR objectives.The "Create Payee" action is well-implemented, aligning with the PR objectives and OnlineCheckWriter API requirements. The code is well-structured, with clear metadata, props definition, and methods.
Key points:
- Action metadata and props are well-defined.
- The
createPayeesmethod correctly interfaces with the API.- The
runmethod properly handles the API call and response.Consider implementing the suggested improvements for input validation and data privacy to further enhance the component's robustness and security.
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/mail-pdf-document/mail-pdf-document.mjs (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and complete.The necessary modules and components are imported correctly, including the
ConfigurationErrorfor proper error handling.
136-143: LGTM: ThemailPdfDocumentmethod is correctly implemented.The method uses the app's post method and allows for additional arguments, providing flexibility in its usage.
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
onlinecheckwriter-new-action-components
branch
from
3c39488
to
0b1c546
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-payee/create-payee.mjs (4)
9-70: Props definition looks good, with a minor suggestion.The props are well-defined and align with the API requirements. All necessary fields for creating a payee are included, with appropriate optional flags.
Consider adding input validation for fields like 'email', 'phone', and 'zip' to ensure data integrity before sending it to the API. This could be done using regex patterns or custom validation functions.
71-78: createPayees method is functional, but could be improved.The method correctly uses the app.post method to send a request to the "/payees" endpoint.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add input validation to ensure the required fields are present in the args object.
- Implement error handling to catch and process any API errors.
- Add logging for better traceability of the API calls.
Example implementation:
createPayees(args = {}) { if (!args.data || !args.data.payees || !args.data.payees.length) { throw new Error("Invalid input: payees data is required"); } return this.app.post({ path: "/payees", ...args, }).catch((error) => { console.error("Error creating payees:", error); throw error; }); },
79-116: run method is functional but could benefit from error handling and validation.The method correctly implements the payee creation process and exports a summary.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add try/catch block for error handling.
- Validate the response to ensure it contains the expected data.
- Handle cases where multiple payees might be created (the API seems to support this).
Example implementation:
async run({ $ }) { const { createPayees, name, company, email, phone, address1, address2, country, state, city, zip, } = this; try { const response = await createPayees({ $, data: { payees: [ { name, company, email, phone, address1, address2, country, state, city, zip, }, ], }, }); if (!response.data || !response.data.payees || !response.data.payees.length) { throw new Error("Unexpected response format from API"); } const createdPayees = response.data.payees; const summaries = createdPayees.map(payee => `Successfully created payee with ID \`${payee.payeeId}\`.` ); $.export("$summary", summaries.join(" ")); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create payee: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },
1-117: Overall implementation is solid, with room for enhancement.The "Create Payee" action is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly implements the basic functionality for creating a payee using the OnlineCheckWriter API.
Consider enhancing this action to support creating multiple payees in a single request, as the API seems to support this functionality. This could be achieved by:
- Modifying the props to accept an array of payee objects.
- Updating the run method to process multiple payees.
- Adjusting the summary export to handle multiple created payees.
This enhancement would make the action more flexible and potentially more efficient for users who need to create multiple payees at once.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-check/create-check.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-payee/create-payee.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/mail-pdf-document/mail-pdf-document.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/onlinecheckwriter.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-check/create-check.mjs
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-email-check/create-email-check.mjs
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-mail-check/create-mail-check.mjs
- components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/mail-pdf-document/mail-pdf-document.mjs
- components/onlinecheckwriter/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/onlinecheckwriter/actions/create-payee/create-payee.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.The import statement and action metadata are well-structured. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is a good practice for maintainability.
components/onlinecheckwriter/onlinecheckwriter.app.mjs (7)
1-6: LGTM: Import and app definitionThe import statement and app definition are correct and follow the expected structure for a Pipedream app.
7-24: LGTM: bankAccountId prop definitionThe
bankAccountIdprop is well-defined with appropriate type, label, and description. The asyncoptionsfunction correctly fetches and maps bank account data.
25-67: LGTM: payeeId, categoryId, and issueDate prop definitionsThe
payeeId,categoryId, andissueDateprops are well-defined and consistent with thebankAccountIdstructure. The optional flags and descriptions are appropriate, and the async options functions are correctly implemented.
115-152: LGTM: customFromAddressId and customToAddressId prop definitionsThe
customFromAddressIdandcustomToAddressIdprops are well-defined and consistent with the structure of other props. The asyncoptionsfunctions are correctly implemented to fetch and map address data.
286-326: LGTM: API interaction methodsThe
postmethod and the various list methods (listBankAccounts, listPayees, etc.) are well-structured and consistently implemented. They provide a clean interface for interacting with different endpoints of the API.
1-329: Overall implementation reviewThe OnlineCheckWriter app implementation is well-structured and comprehensive. It provides a robust set of prop definitions and methods for interacting with the API. The code is generally consistent and follows good practices for Pipedream app development.
Key points for improvement:
- Add default values to boolean properties as suggested earlier.
- Fix the typo in paper type labels ("Hollogram" to "Hologram").
- Improve error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod as detailed in the previous comment.These minor adjustments will enhance the clarity, correctness, and robustness of the implementation. Great job overall on creating a solid foundation for the OnlineCheckWriter integration!
153-238:⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in 'Hollogram' to 'Hologram' in paper type labels
The labels "Hollogram Check Paper" and "Ultra Hollogram Check Paper" contain a typo. The correct spelling is "Hologram."
Apply this diff to correct the typos:
paperTypeId: { type: "string", label: "Paper Type ID", description: "Must be a valid paper type ID.", options: [ { label: "Regular Check Paper", value: "7", }, { - label: "Hollogram Check Paper", + label: "Hologram Check Paper", value: "8", }, { - label: "Ultra Hollogram Check Paper", + label: "Ultra Hologram Check Paper", value: "9", }, ], },This change corrects the spelling and improves the accuracy of the paper type labels.
WHY
Resolves #14067
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update