[Components] americommerce #14229
[Components] americommerce #14229
Conversation
jcortes
added
action
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules and enhancements to the Americommerce application, focusing on order management and customer updates. Key additions include functionalities for changing order statuses, creating or updating orders, and updating customer details. New event sources are also implemented to handle events for new customers, new products, and valid orders. Additionally, constants and methods for API interactions are defined, improving the overall structure and capabilities of the application. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 25
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (29)
components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs (2)
2-2: LGTM: Well-constructed base URL constantThe
BASE_URLconstant effectively uses theSUBDOMAIN_PLACEHOLDERto create a dynamic base URL for Americommerce API calls. This approach allows for easy customization per store.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this constant and how it should be used, especially for developers new to the Americommerce API structure.
3-3: LGTM: API version path constantThe
VERSION_PATHconstant is well-defined and follows good practices for API version management.Consider extracting the version number "v1" into a separate constant (e.g.,
API_VERSION) for easier updates in the future. This would allow for quicker version changes across the entire codebase.components/americommerce/package.json (2)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features to the AmeriCommerce component as outlined in the PR objectives.
Consider updating the CHANGELOG.md (if it exists) to document the new features and changes introduced in this version.
15-17: Dependencies addition is appropriate.The addition of @pipedream/platform as a dependency is likely necessary for the new functionalities implemented in this PR.
Consider using a caret (^) before the version number (e.g., "^3.0.3") to allow for compatible updates. This practice can help in getting bug fixes and non-breaking changes automatically while still maintaining stability.
components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs (2)
5-12: LGTM: Well-structured source module definition.The exported object is well-structured and includes all necessary properties for a source module. The use of the spread operator to include
commonproperties is a good practice for code reuse.Consider adding a
typeproperty to thesampleEmitimport for better code clarity:import { type PropType } from "@pipedream/types"; import sampleEmit from "./test-event.mjs";This change would make it clear that
sampleEmitis of typePropType.
13-26: LGTM: Well-implemented methods with room for minor improvement.The methods are well-implemented and follow good practices. The
getEventTypemethod ensures consistency by using a constant from the events module. ThegenerateMetamethod effectively constructs the event metadata.Consider adding a check for the existence of the
productproperty in theresourceobject to make thegenerateMetamethod more robust:generateMeta(resource) { if (!resource.product) { throw new Error("Invalid resource: missing product data"); } const { product } = resource; return { id: product.id, summary: `New Product: ${product.id}`, ts: Date.parse(product.created_at), }; },This change would prevent potential runtime errors if the
resourceobject doesn't have the expected structure.components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (2)
5-12: Object properties are well-defined and aligned with PR objectives.The exported object's properties are appropriate for a new customer event source. Good job including a link to the documentation in the description.
Consider implementing a versioning strategy for future updates. While "0.0.1" is suitable for the initial release, you may want to establish guidelines for when and how to increment the version number in subsequent updates.
13-26: Methods are well-implemented and align with PR objectives.The
getEventTypeandgenerateMetamethods are correctly implemented to handle new customer events. The metadata construction ingenerateMetaprovides the necessary information for event processing.Consider adding error handling in the
generateMetamethod to gracefully handle cases where thecustomerobject or its properties might be undefined. For example:generateMeta(resource) { const { customer } = resource; if (!customer) { throw new Error("Invalid resource: customer object is missing"); } return { id: customer.id, summary: `New Customer: ${customer.first_name || 'Unknown'}`, ts: customer.created_at ? Date.parse(customer.created_at) : Date.now(), }; },This change would make the method more robust against potential data inconsistencies.
components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs (2)
5-12: LGTM: Well-structured component with clear metadata.The exported object follows the standard Pipedream component structure and includes all necessary metadata. The description is informative and includes a link to the API documentation.
Consider adding a brief mention of the specific conditions for a "valid" order in the description. For example:
- description: "Emit new event when a new valid order (not declined or cancelled) is created in your Americommerce store. [See the documentation](https://developers.cart.com/docs/rest-api/ZG9jOjM1MDU4Nw-webhooks#subscribing-to-a-webhook).", + description: "Emit new event when a new valid order (not declined or cancelled) is created in your Americommerce store. This source only triggers for orders that are not in a declined or cancelled state. [See the documentation](https://developers.cart.com/docs/rest-api/ZG9jOjM1MDU4Nw-webhooks#subscribing-to-a-webhook).",
13-26: LGTM: Methods are well-implemented and consistent with the component's purpose.The
getEventTypeandgenerateMetamethods are correctly implemented and provide the necessary functionality for handling new valid order events.Consider adding error handling in the
generateMetamethod to ensure robustness:generateMeta(resource) { const { order } = resource; + if (!order || !order.id || !order.created_at) { + throw new Error("Invalid order data received"); + } return { id: order.id, summary: `New Valid Order: ${order.id}`, ts: Date.parse(order.created_at), }; },This change will help catch and handle potential issues with malformed order data.
components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs (2)
1-32: LGTM! Well-structured event constants.The overall structure of this file is good. Exporting a single object with event constants centralizes event names, which is excellent for maintainability and consistency across the application. The naming conventions follow best practices with uppercase for constants and PascalCase for values.
Consider adding comments to group related constants for improved readability. For example:
export default { // Payment related events AUTHORIZING_PAYMENT: "AuthorizingPayment", CAPTURING_PAYMENT: "CapturingPayment", PAYMENT_PROCESSED: "PaymentProcessed", // Customer related events CUSTOMER_CREATED: "CustomerCreated", CUSTOMER_EMAIL_UPDATED: "CustomerEmailUpdated", // ... other customer events ... // Order related events NEW_ORDER: "NewOrder", NEW_VALID_ORDER: "NewValidOrder", ORDER_APPROVED: "OrderApproved", // ... other order events ... // Product related events PRODUCT_CREATED: "ProductCreated", PRODUCT_STATUS_CHANGED: "ProductStatusChanged", PRODUCT_UPDATED: "ProductUpdated", // Quote related events NEW_QUOTE: "NewQuote", QUOTE_STATUS_CHANGED: "QuoteStatusChanged", QUOTE_UPDATED: "QuoteUpdated", // Validation events VALIDATE_CART: "ValidateCart", VALIDATE_CHECKOUT: "ValidateCheckout", VALIDATE_CUSTOMER: "ValidateCustomer", VALIDATE_PRODUCT: "ValidateProduct", };This grouping aligns well with the categories mentioned in the PR objectives and improves the overall organization of the constants.
8-11: Consider more descriptive names for some constants.Some constants might benefit from more descriptive names to better convey their purpose:
Consider the following changes:
- GET_DISCOUNT: "GetDiscount", - GET_PRICE: "GetPrice", - GET_PRODUCT_STATUS: "GetProductStatus", - GET_TAX: "GetTax", + DISCOUNT_RETRIEVED: "DiscountRetrieved", + PRICE_RETRIEVED: "PriceRetrieved", + PRODUCT_STATUS_RETRIEVED: "ProductStatusRetrieved", + TAX_RETRIEVED: "TaxRetrieved",These changes make the event names more action-oriented and consistent with other event names in the file.
components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-48: LGTM! Consider enhancing sample data for improved testing.The overall structure of the test event is well-designed and comprehensive, covering various aspects of customer data typically found in e-commerce systems. However, to improve its effectiveness for testing, consider the following suggestions:
Use more realistic sample values for properties like
id,customer_number,Consider adding a
@ts-checkcomment at the top of the file if you're using TypeScript, to enable type checking in JavaScript files.For consistency, consider using camelCase for all property names (e.g.,
customerNumberinstead ofcustomer_number).Here's an example of how you could improve some of the sample data:
export default { "customer": { "id": 12345, "customerNumber": "CUST-001", "lastName": "Doe", "firstName": "John", "email": "[email protected]", "phoneNumber": "+1 (555) 123-4567", "registeredAt": "2023-05-15T10:30:00Z", "lastVisitAt": "2023-05-20T14:45:00Z", // ... other properties } };These changes would make the test data more realistic and potentially more useful for testing various scenarios.
components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
1-65: Comprehensive order structure, consider adding JSDoc commentsThe exported object provides a thorough representation of an order, including various identifiers, financial details, timestamps, and flags. The structure is well-organized and the property names are clear and self-explanatory.
To further improve the code:
Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose of this object and provide type information for the properties. This would enhance code documentation and improve IDE support.
You might want to group related properties together (e.g., all financial totals, all address-related fields) to improve readability.
Here's an example of how you could start the file with JSDoc comments:
/** * @typedef {Object} Order * @property {number} id - The unique identifier for the order * @property {number} customer_id - The unique identifier for the customer * ... (add more property descriptions) */ /** * Represents a test event for a new valid order in AmeriCommerce. * @type {{order: Order}} */ export default { "order": { // ... (existing properties) } };
3-63: Enhance data representation for improved consistency and realismThe properties in the order object are comprehensive, but there are a few areas where we can improve data representation:
Date fields: Consider using a consistent date format for all date-related fields (e.g., "ordered_at", "updated_at", "created_at", "order_status_last_changed_at", "expires_at", "due_date"). The ISO 8601 format (e.g., "2023-05-17T14:30:00Z") is recommended for its universality and ease of parsing.
ID fields: While using 0 for ID fields is acceptable in a test event, consider using realistic, non-zero values to better represent real-world scenarios. This could help catch potential issues with ID handling in the actual code.
Numeric values: For financial fields (e.g., "subtotal", "tax_total", "shipping_total"), consider using non-zero values with decimal places to better represent real-world currency amounts.
Boolean fields: Ensure that boolean fields (e.g., "is_ppc", "is_payment_order_only", "is_gift") have varied values (both true and false) to cover different scenarios.
Here's an example of how you could update a few fields:
export default { "order": { "id": 12345, "customer_id": 67890, "ordered_at": "2023-05-17T14:30:00Z", "subtotal": 99.99, "tax_total": 8.50, "is_gift": false, // ... (other properties) } };
1-65: Test event aligns well with PR objectives, consider expanding test coverageThis test event structure for a new valid order aligns well with the PR objectives, particularly for the "Emit a new event when a valid order (not declined or canceled) is created" requirement. The comprehensive nature of the order object allows for thorough testing of order-related functionalities.
To further enhance the test coverage and align with the PR objectives:
Consider creating similar test event files for the other event types mentioned in the PR objectives (new customer, new product).
Ensure that the
order_status_idfield in this test event represents a valid (not declined or canceled) order status to accurately test the event emission logic.If not already implemented, create test cases that use this test event to verify the correct functioning of the new valid order event source.
As you continue development, consider creating a shared type definition for the Order object that can be used across different parts of the application to ensure consistency and improve maintainability.
components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs (6)
1-30: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The basic product information structure is comprehensive and well-organized. It covers essential details such as identifiers, descriptions, and physical attributes.
To improve code maintainability and provide better context for developers, consider adding JSDoc comments for the main object and key properties. For example:
/** * @typedef {Object} Product * @property {number} id - Unique identifier for the product * @property {string} item_number - Product's item number or SKU * @property {string} item_name - Name of the product * ... */ export default { product: { // ... existing properties } };
22-30: LGTM! Consider adding a field for reorder point.The pricing and inventory section is well-structured, covering various price points and inventory statuses. The boolean flags for product categorization are particularly useful.
To enhance inventory management, consider adding a
reorder_pointfield. This would complement the existinglow_stock_warning_thresholdand help automate inventory replenishment processes. For example:{ // ... existing properties "reorder_point": 0, // ... other properties }Also applies to: 56-59, 74-80
31-55: LGTM! Consider adding a field for digital product expiration.The e-commerce specific fields are comprehensive, covering important aspects such as SEO, shipping options, and digital product management. The inclusion of custom flags provides excellent flexibility for store-specific needs.
To enhance digital product management, consider adding an
e_product_expiration_daysfield. This would allow setting an expiration period for digital products, which is useful for time-limited access. For example:{ // ... existing properties "e_product_expiration_days": 0, // ... other properties }Also applies to: 60-73
81-145: LGTM! Consider adding fields for subscription management.The advanced features and integrations section is impressive, covering a wide range of complex e-commerce scenarios. The support for subscriptions, loyalty programs, and shipping integrations demonstrates a robust and scalable structure.
To enhance subscription product management, consider adding fields for managing subscription terms and cancellation policies. For example:
{ // ... existing properties "subscription_minimum_term": 0, "subscription_cancellation_policy": "string", // ... other properties }These additions would provide more control over subscription products and help clarify terms for customers.
146-167: LGTM! Consider adding a field for variant-specific inventory.The variants section is well-structured, allowing for flexible product configurations. The inclusion of swatch-related fields and variant-specific pricing adjustments provides robust support for complex product offerings.
To enhance variant management, consider adding a field for variant-specific inventory. This would allow more granular inventory tracking for products with multiple variants. For example:
{ // ... existing variant properties "quantity_on_hand": 0, "quantity_on_order": 0, // ... other properties }This addition would enable more accurate inventory management for products with multiple variants, especially when
use_variant_inventoryis set to true.
1-169: Excellent product structure for e-commerce. Consider adding type definitions.The product object structure in this file is comprehensive and well-designed, covering a wide range of e-commerce scenarios including basic product information, pricing, inventory management, digital products, subscriptions, and variants. It provides a solid foundation for building robust e-commerce applications.
To further improve the maintainability and type safety of the codebase, consider defining TypeScript interfaces or type definitions for the product structure. This would provide better documentation and enable static type checking. For example:
interface Product { id: number; item_number: string; // ... other properties variants: Variant[]; } interface Variant { id: number; product_id: number; // ... other variant properties } const testEvent: { product: Product } = { product: { // ... existing product object } }; export default testEvent;This approach would make the structure more robust and easier to maintain as the project evolves.
components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (1)
154-191: Use Async/Await ConsistentlyThe
_makeRequestmethod and its callers should consistently useasync/awaitfor readability and error handling.Ensure that all methods that call
_makeRequestare marked asasyncand useawait.// Example for getCustomers method - getCustomers(args = {}) { + async getCustomers(args = {}) { return this._makeRequest({ ...args, path: "/customers", }); }Apply similar changes to other methods.
components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (2)
131-154: Use appropriate data types for numerical fieldsThe properties
taxRateandcreditLimitare defined with the type"string", but they represent numerical values. It's better to use the type"number"to accurately represent these properties and to ensure proper validation.Apply this diff to update the data types:
taxRate: { - type: "string", + type: "number", label: "Tax Rate", description: "The tax rate for the customer.", optional: true, }, creditLimit: { - type: "string", + type: "number", label: "Credit Limit", description: "The credit limit for the customer.", optional: true, },
219-246: Ensure all provided data properties are filtered to removeundefinedvaluesWhen constructing the
dataobject, properties that are not set (i.e.,undefined) are still being included. This could lead to issues with the API if it does not handlenullorundefinedvalues gracefully.Consider filtering out
undefinedvalues before sending the data. Here's how you might modify the code:const data = { customer_number: customerNumber, last_name: lastName, // other properties override_shared_credit_limit: overrideSharedCreditLimit, }; + // Filter out undefined values + Object.keys(data).forEach(key => data[key] === undefined && delete data[key]); const response = await this.updateCustomer({ $, customerId, data, });components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (4)
284-288: Use Date Picker fordueDatePropThe
dueDateprop accepts a string input for the date, but this can lead to formatting errors. Consider using the"date"type to provide a date picker UI, ensuring correct date formatting.Update the prop type to use a date picker:
dueDate: { - type: "string", + type: "string", + uiWidget: "datePicker", label: "Due Date", description: "The due date for the order. E.g., `2021-05-14`", optional: true, },
278-282: Add Options fordevicePropThe
deviceprop does not currently provide predefined options, which could lead to inconsistent data input. Providing a list of accepted values helps users select valid options and prevents errors.Consider adding options for the
deviceprop:device: { type: "string", label: "Device", description: "The device for the order.", optional: true, + options: [ + "Desktop", + "Mobile", + "Tablet", + "Unknown", + ], },
298-305: Consistency in Method Parameter DefinitionsIn the
updateOrdermethod, parameters are destructured differently compared tocreateOrder, which may cause confusion. For consistency, consider aligning the parameter structures of both methods.Standardize the parameter definitions:
updateOrder(args = {}) { - return this.app.put({ - path: `/orders/${args.orderId}`, - ...args, + const { orderId, ...rest } = args; + return this.app.put({ + path: `/orders/${orderId}`, + ...rest, }); },
170-171: Typographical Error in DescriptionThere's a minor typographical error in the description of the
selectedShippingProviderServiceprop: an extra period at the end.Correct the description for clarity:
description: "The selected shipping provider service for the order.", - description: "The selected shipping provider service for the order.", + description: "The selected shipping provider service for the order",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (21)
components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM: Well-defined placeholder constantThe
SUBDOMAIN_PLACEHOLDERconstant is appropriately named and valued, making it clear and useful for dynamic URL construction.
6-11: LGTM: Well-structured default exportThe default export statement is well-organized, exporting all defined constants as properties of a single object. This approach facilitates easy importing and usage of these constants in other parts of the codebase.
1-11: Overall: Well-structured constants file with minor suggestions for improvementThis new
constants.mjsfile provides a clean and organized way to manage important values for Americommerce API interactions. The use of constants for the subdomain placeholder, base URL, and API version path is a good practice that will enhance maintainability and flexibility of the codebase.Summary of suggestions:
- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose and usage of each constant, especially for
BASE_URLandWEBHOOK_ID.- For better future-proofing, consider extracting the API version number into a separate constant.
These minor enhancements will further improve the clarity and maintainability of the code. Great job on setting up this constants file!
4-4: Please clarify the purpose of WEBHOOK_ID constantThe
WEBHOOK_IDconstant is defined, but its specific purpose and usage are not immediately clear from the context provided.Could you please provide more information on how this constant is used in the Americommerce API interactions? Is it a required parameter for certain endpoints, or does it serve a specific purpose in webhook management?
To help understand its usage, let's search for its occurrences in the codebase:
This will help us understand the context and ensure the constant is appropriately named and valued.
components/americommerce/package.json (1)
14-14: PublishConfig change is appropriate.Setting the "access" to "public" in publishConfig ensures that the package will be publicly accessible when published to npm, which is consistent with Pipedream's open-source practices.
components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs (3)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and consistent.The import statements correctly bring in the necessary modules from common files and the test event file. This approach promotes code reuse and maintainability.
27-27: LGTM: Appropriate use of sampleEmit for testing.The inclusion of
sampleEmitis a good practice for testing and documentation purposes. It allows for easy simulation of the event emission process.
1-28: Overall assessment: Well-implemented new product event source.This new module effectively implements the event source for new products in Americommerce, aligning with the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, follows good practices, and is ready for integration.
Key strengths:
- Proper use of common modules for code reuse.
- Clear and concise implementation of required methods.
- Inclusion of documentation link and sample emit for testing.
Consider implementing the minor suggestions provided in previous comments to further enhance the robustness and clarity of the code.
components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (3)
1-3: Imports look good!The imports are appropriate for the module's functionality, bringing in common webhook functionality, events, and a sample emit for testing.
27-27: Good inclusion of sample emit.Including
sampleEmitin the exported object is beneficial for testing and documentation purposes. The separation of the sample emit implementation into a separate file (test-event.mjs) is a good practice for maintaining code organization.
1-28: Overall, excellent implementation of the new customer event source.This implementation of the "New Customer Created (Instant)" event source for Americommerce is well-structured, concise, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It effectively leverages common functionality while providing specific implementations for event type and metadata generation.
Key strengths:
- Clear and descriptive naming
- Good separation of concerns
- Proper use of common modules
- Inclusion of documentation link and sample emit for testing
The code is readable, maintainable, and follows good practices. Great job on this implementation!
components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs (3)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and promote code reuse.The import statements are well-structured, importing common functionalities and a sample event emitter. This approach promotes code reuse and maintainability.
27-27: LGTM: Inclusion of sampleEmit enhances testability and documentation.The inclusion of
sampleEmitis a good practice. It provides a sample event for testing and documentation purposes, which can be very helpful for users of this component.
1-28: Overall assessment: Well-implemented component meeting PR objectives.This new source module for handling new valid order events in Americommerce is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly implements the event emission for new valid orders, excluding declined or cancelled orders as specified.
Key strengths:
- Follows Pipedream's component structure and best practices.
- Utilizes common modules for code reuse.
- Includes appropriate metadata and documentation links.
- Implements necessary methods for event type and metadata generation.
The minor suggestions provided earlier will further enhance the robustness and clarity of the component. Great job on this implementation!
To ensure consistency with other components and verify the implementation, let's run the following checks:
These checks will help ensure that the new component follows consistent patterns and implements the required functionality correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Component Structure and Implementation Validated.
All checks have passed successfully:
- Naming Convention: Consistent naming across components.
- Common Import Usage: Proper usage of common modules.
- Event Type Usage: Correct implementation of event types.
- generateMeta Implementation: Accurate metadata generation.
The component meets all required standards and specifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify component structure and implementation details # Test 1: Check for consistent naming convention echo "Checking naming convention:" fd -e mjs -E common --exec grep -H 'key: "americommerce-' {} \; # Test 2: Verify common import usage echo "\nChecking common import usage:" grep -n "import common from \"../common/webhook.mjs\";" components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs # Test 3: Check for consistent event type usage echo "\nChecking event type usage:" grep -n "return events.NEW_VALID_ORDER;" components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs # Test 4: Verify generateMeta implementation echo "\nChecking generateMeta implementation:" sed -n '/generateMeta/,/^ },/p' components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjsLength of output: 1787
components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs (1)
1-32: Verify alignment with API documentation.The constants defined in this file seem to cover a wide range of events related to e-commerce operations. To ensure completeness and accuracy, it's important to verify that these events align with the AmeriCommerce REST API documentation mentioned in the linked issue.
Run the following script to check for any potential mismatches or missing events:
This script will help identify any potential gaps between the defined events and the API documentation, as well as verify that all defined events are actually used in the codebase.
components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1)
68-69: Confirm the use ofdebug: truein API requestsIn the
createWebhook(lines 68-69) anddeleteWebhook(lines 77-78) methods, thedebug: trueflag is set in the API request options. Ensure that this is intended behavior for production. If not, consider removing it to prevent unnecessary logging or potential exposure of sensitive information.Also applies to: 77-78
components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs (1)
1-1: Ensure correct import path for theappmoduleVerify that the import path
"../../americommerce.app.mjs"correctly points to theappmodule. Incorrect paths can lead to module resolution errors.Run the following script to check if the file exists:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The import path
"../../americommerce.app.mjs"correctly points to theappmodule located atcomponents/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `americommerce.app.mjs` file exists at the specified path. # Test: Check for the existence of the file. Expect: Path to the file. fd 'americommerce\.app\.mjs' components/Length of output: 89
components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (2)
175-182:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid destructuring methods from
thisto prevent losing contextDestructuring the
updateCustomermethod fromthismay lead to the loss of the correctthisbinding within the method. It's safer to reference the method directly usingthis.updateCustomerto maintain the proper context.Apply this diff to correct the method call:
async run({ $ }) { - const { - updateCustomer, customerId, // other destructured properties - } = this; const response = await this.updateCustomer({ $, customerId, data: { // data fields }, });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
6-6: Verify the documentation linkThe documentation link provided in the
descriptionmay be outdated or incorrect. Ensure that the link points to the current API documentation for updating a customer.Run the following script to check the validity of the URL:
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is valid and up to date.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the documentation URL returns a 200 OK status. # Test: Use curl to check the HTTP status code. Expect: 200 OK. curl -I https://developers.cart.com/docs/rest-api/5da2f1ddbe199-update-a-customer | head -n 1Length of output: 424
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (2)
371-411: Ensure Accurate Field MappingsSome property names in the
dataobject should be carefully matched to the expected API fields. For instance, verify that fields likecustomer_type_idandselected_shipping_methodare correctly named according to the API specifications.Please confirm that all fields in the
dataobject match the API's expected parameter names to prevent any request failures.
247-251:⚠️ Potential issueData Type Mismatch for
expiresPropThe
expiresprop is defined as a boolean, but according to the API documentation, theexpiresfield expects a date value indicating when the order expires. Using a boolean here may lead to incorrect data being sent.Please verify the expected data type for the
expiresfield. If it should be a date, update the prop definition accordingly.
components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
americommerce-new-componets
branch
from
6b40234
to
5ef7e0d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
1-65: LGTM! Consider improving readability with property grouping.The overall structure of the exported object is well-organized and comprehensive, covering various aspects of an order. This aligns well with the PR objective of handling order-related events.
To enhance readability and maintainability, consider grouping related properties together and adding comments to separate these groups. For example:
export default { "order": { // Order identifiers "id": 0, "order_number": "string", // Customer information "customer_id": 0, "customer_type_id": 0, // Order details "ordered_at": "string", "order_status_id": 0, "special_instructions": "string", // Financial information "subtotal": 0, "tax_total": 0, // ... other financial properties ... // ... continue grouping other properties ... } };This grouping will make it easier for developers to quickly find and understand related properties.
2-64: Properties look good. Consider standardizing date-time property names.The order object properties are comprehensive and well-structured, covering various aspects of an order. This aligns with the PR objective of handling order-related events and actions.
For consistency, consider standardizing the naming of date-time related properties. Currently, you have:
ordered_atupdated_atcreated_atorder_status_last_changed_atexpires_atdue_dateConsider using a consistent suffix (e.g.,
_ator_date) for all date-time properties:- "due_date": "string", + "due_at": "string",This will improve consistency and make it easier for developers to identify and work with date-time properties.
1-65: File purpose aligns well with PR objectives. Consider adding a brief comment.This test event file provides a comprehensive sample order object, which aligns perfectly with the PR objective of emitting new events for valid orders. The inclusion of status-related properties also supports the objective of changing order statuses.
To improve clarity for other developers, consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file explaining its purpose:
// This file provides a sample valid order object for testing the new-valid-order-instant event source. // It contains a comprehensive representation of an order with default values for all properties. export default { "order": { // ... existing properties ... } };This comment will help other developers quickly understand the file's purpose and its relation to the PR objectives.
components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs (4)
1-30: Consider standardizing data types for consistencyThe basic product information section contains some inconsistencies in data types:
id,manufacturer_id, andprimary_category_idare numbers, which is correct.height,length, andwidthare strings, whileweightis a number.weight_unitandsize_unitare provided, but the dimensions are still strings.To improve consistency and ease of use:
- Consider using numbers for all dimension-related fields (
height,length,width,weight).- If different units are needed, consider creating separate fields for the numeric value and the unit (e.g.,
height_valueandheight_unit).Example refactor for dimensions:
"height_value": 0, "height_unit": "string", "length_value": 0, "length_unit": "string", "width_value": 0, "width_unit": "string", "weight": 0, "weight_unit": "string",This structure would make it easier to perform calculations and conversions while still maintaining unit flexibility.
22-30: Use boolean foris_spotlight_itemThe
is_spotlight_itemfield is currently set to 0, which implies a boolean value. However, later in the object, boolean fields are correctly usingtrueorfalse. For consistency and clarity, consider changing this field to a boolean.Replace line 27 with:
"is_spotlight_item": false,This change will make the field consistent with other boolean fields in the object and improve code readability.
31-145: Consider adding comments or more descriptive names for custom fieldsThe product attributes section is comprehensive and well-structured. However, some fields have generic names that might be unclear to developers unfamiliar with the system:
custom_flag_1throughcustom_flag_5(lines 66-70)e_product_type(line 34)rate_adjustment_type(line 44)To improve code maintainability and self-documentation:
- Consider adding comments explaining the purpose and possible values for these fields.
- If possible, use more descriptive names that indicate the specific use of each custom flag.
Example of adding comments:
// Custom flags for [explain purpose] "custom_flag_1": true, // Indicates [specific use] "custom_flag_2": true, // Indicates [specific use] // ... and so on "e_product_type": "string", // Possible values: [list possible values and their meanings] "rate_adjustment_type": "string", // Possible values: [list possible values and their meanings]This addition would greatly improve the understanding of the product structure for future developers working with this code.
146-167: Variant structure is well-defined, minor consistency improvement suggestedThe variant structure is comprehensive and well-designed, including necessary fields for managing product variations effectively. The inclusion of swatch-related fields is particularly useful for visual representation.
One minor suggestion for consistency:
The
weight_typefield in the variant (line 159) uses a string, while the main product object usesweight_unit. Consider renamingweight_typetoweight_unitfor consistency across the product and its variants.Suggested change:
- "weight_type": "string", + "weight_unit": "string",This change would align the naming convention between the main product and its variants, improving overall consistency in the data structure.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs
- components/americommerce/package.json
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (3)
4-9: Action metadata looks goodThe action metadata is well-defined with a clear name, description (including API documentation links), and an appropriate initial version number.
1-431: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvementThe create/update order action is well-structured and comprehensive. It covers a wide range of order properties and handles both creation and update scenarios. The suggested improvements will enhance its robustness and maintainability:
- Making the
orderIdprop optional- Preventing potential property overwriting in the
createOrdermethod- Simplifying the required fields validation
- Excluding undefined properties in the
dataobjectImplementing these changes will result in a more reliable and efficient action.
370-412: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionExclude undefined properties in
dataobjectThe
dataobject includes all properties regardless of whether they have values. Sending undefined properties to the API can lead to errors or unintended behavior. It's better to exclude properties that have not been set.Filter out undefined properties before making the API call:
const data = { customer_id: customerId, order_status_id: orderStatusId, // ... other fields due_date: dueDate, }; + // Remove properties with undefined values + Object.keys(data).forEach((key) => data[key] === undefined && delete data[key]);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (2)
7-152: Property Definitions Implemented CorrectlyThe
propDefinitionssection introduces various properties such ascustomerId,orderId,storeId, etc. Each property is well-defined with appropriate types, labels, descriptions, andoptionsmethods. The use of asynchronousoptionsmethods to fetch data from the API enhances the dynamic capability of these properties.
154-252: API Methods Are Well-Structured and ConsistentThe newly added methods for API interactions (
getCustomers,getAdCodes,getOrders, etc.) are clearly defined and follow a consistent pattern. They effectively utilize the_makeRequesthelper function to interact with different endpoints, which promotes code reuse and maintainability.
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| createOrder(args = {}) { | ||
| return this.app.post({ | ||
| path: "/orders", | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prevent potential property overwriting in createOrder
As mentioned in a previous review, there's a risk of overwriting important properties like path or data when spreading args. To prevent this, explicitly define the request options.
Modify the createOrder method to explicitly set request options:
createOrder(args = {}) {
+ const { data, ...rest } = args;
return this.app.post({
path: "/orders",
- ...args,
+ data,
+ ...rest,
});
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| createOrder(args = {}) { | |
| return this.app.post({ | |
| path: "/orders", | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| createOrder(args = {}) { | |
| const { data, ...rest } = args; | |
| return this.app.post({ | |
| path: "/orders", | |
| data, | |
| ...rest, | |
| }); | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @jcortes, I just added a comment but I'm moving it to Ready For QA anyway!
| props: { | ||
| app, | ||
| orderStatusId: { | ||
| optional: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| optional: false, |
jcortes
force-pushed
the
americommerce-new-componets
branch
from
5ef7e0d
to
7b093d2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1)
1-90: Overall assessment: Good foundation, needs some refinementsThis new webhook module provides a solid foundation for implementing event emissions and actions for the Americommerce application, aligning well with the PR objectives. However, there are a few critical points that need to be addressed:
- Implement the
generateMeta()method to properly generate metadata for emitted events.- Implement the
getEventType()method to return the correct event type for the webhook.- Add error handling to the
run()function to improve robustness.These refinements will ensure that the webhook module functions correctly and handles errors gracefully. Once these changes are made, the module will be ready to serve as a base for specific event sources in the Americommerce integration.
Consider creating separate files for each specific event source (e.g.,
new-customer.mjs,new-product.mjs,new-order.mjs) that extend this common webhook module. In these files, you can implement the specificgenerateMeta()andgetEventType()methods tailored to each event type. This approach will promote modularity and make it easier to maintain and extend the integration in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs
- components/americommerce/package.json
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (4)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriateThe imports are correctly defined and seem appropriate for the module's functionality.
6-20: LGTM: Props are well-definedThe props are correctly defined and align with the module's purpose. The
storeIdbeing required is consistent with the PR objectives for event emissions and actions.
50-82:⚠️ Potential issueImplement generateMeta and getEventType methods
The methods section is mostly well-implemented, but there are two critical issues:
- The
generateMeta()method is not implemented.- The
getEventType()method is not implemented.Both of these throw
ConfigurationErrors, which will cause runtime errors when the webhook is triggered.To resolve these issues:
- Implement the
generateMeta()method to return appropriate metadata for the emitted events. For example:generateMeta(resource) { return { id: resource.id, summary: `New ${this.getEventType()} event`, ts: Date.now(), }; }
- Implement the
getEventType()method to return the correct event type for the webhook. For example:getEventType() { return "customer.created"; // or the appropriate event type }Ensure that these methods are implemented in each specific source that extends this common webhook module, tailoring them to the specific event type and resource structure.
83-89:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling to the run function
The
runfunction is concise, but it lacks error handling which could lead to unhandled exceptions.To improve robustness, add error handling to the
processResourcecall:async run({ body }) { this.http.respond({ status: 200, }); try { this.processResource(body); } catch (error) { console.error("Error processing resource:", error); // Optionally, emit an error event or handle the error further } }This change will ensure that any errors during resource processing are caught and logged, preventing unexpected crashes and improving the overall reliability of the webhook handler.
components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports look goodThe imports for axios and constants are appropriate for this module.
1-253: Overall good implementation with room for improvementThe
americommerce.app.mjsfile provides a solid foundation for interacting with the AmeriCommerce API. The structure is clear, and the implementation is consistent across different entities. However, there are a few areas where improvements can be made:
- Implement pagination in all API calls, both in
propDefinitionsand entity retrieval methods.- Enhance error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod.- Simplify the
shippingMethodIdoptions method to align with other propDefinitions.Addressing these points will improve the performance, reliability, and consistency of the application, especially when dealing with large datasets.
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (4)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and metadata look goodThe import statements and action metadata are well-defined. The description includes links to relevant API documentation, which is helpful for users.
1-431: Overall, a well-implemented and comprehensive order management actionThis implementation of the create/update order action is thorough and well-structured. It covers a wide range of order properties and handles both creation and update scenarios effectively. The code is organized logically and follows good practices.
The suggested improvements, such as simplifying validation, optimizing data construction, and refining prop definitions, will further enhance the code's readability, maintainability, and robustness.
Great job on implementing this complex action!
291-296:⚠️ Potential issuePrevent potential property overwriting in
createOrderWhen spreading
argsinto the request options, there's a risk of overwriting important properties likepathordata. To prevent this, explicitly define the request options.Modify the
createOrdermethod to explicitly set request options:createOrder(args = {}) { + const { data, ...rest } = args; return this.app.post({ path: "/orders", - ...args, + data, + ...rest, }); },Likely invalid or redundant comment.
370-412: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize data object construction
The
dataobject includes all properties regardless of whether they have values. Sending undefined properties to the API can lead to errors or unintended behavior. It's better to exclude properties that have not been set.Filter out undefined properties before making the API call:
const data = { customer_id: customerId, order_status_id: orderStatusId, // ... other fields due_date: dueDate, }; + // Remove properties with undefined values + Object.keys(data).forEach((key) => data[key] === undefined && delete data[key]);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| hooks: { | ||
| async activate() { | ||
| const { | ||
| createWebhook, | ||
| setWebhookId, | ||
| http: { endpoint: url }, | ||
| getEventType, | ||
| storeId, | ||
| } = this; | ||
| const response = | ||
| await createWebhook({ | ||
| data: { | ||
| url, | ||
| event_type: getEventType(), | ||
| store_id: storeId, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| setWebhookId(response.id); | ||
| }, | ||
| async deactivate() { | ||
| const webhookId = this.getWebhookId(); | ||
| if (webhookId) { | ||
| await this.deleteWebhook({ | ||
| webhookId, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hooks implementation looks good, but getEventType() needs attention
The activate and deactivate hooks are well-implemented for webhook management. However, there's a potential issue:
- The
getEventType()method is called in theactivatehook, but it's not implemented (as seen in themethodssection). This will throw aConfigurationErrorduring runtime.
To resolve this, implement the getEventType() method in the methods section to return the appropriate event type based on the webhook's purpose. For example:
getEventType() {
return "customer.created"; // or the appropriate event type
}Make sure to implement this method for each specific source that extends this common webhook module.
| label, | ||
| value: String(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| storeId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Store ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the store.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { stores } = await this.getStores(); | ||
| return stores.map(({ | ||
| name: label, id: value, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label, | ||
| value: String(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| orderId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Order ID", | ||
| description: "The unique identifier for the order. Required for updating or changing the status of an order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { orders } = await this.getOrders(); | ||
| return orders.map(({ | ||
| id, order_number: orderNumber, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label: `Order #${orderNumber}`, | ||
| value: String(id), | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| orderStatusId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Order Status ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the order status.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { order_statuses: orderStatuses } = await this.getOrderStatuses(); | ||
| return orderStatuses.map(({ | ||
| name: label, id: value, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label, | ||
| value: String(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| orderAddressId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Order Address ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the order's address.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { addresses } = await this.getOrderAddresses(); | ||
| return addresses.map(({ | ||
| id, address_line_1: label, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label, | ||
| value: String(id), | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| shippingMethodId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Shipping Method ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the shipping method.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options({ mapper = ({ id }) => String(id) }) { | ||
| const { shipments } = await this.getOrderShipments(); | ||
| return shipments.map(mapper); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| subscriptionId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Subscription ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the subscription.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { subscriptions } = await this.getSubscriptions(); | ||
| return subscriptions.map(({ id }) => String(id)); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| emailTemplateId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Email Template ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the email template.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { email_templates: emailTemplates } = await this.getEmailTemplates(); | ||
| return emailTemplates.map(({ | ||
| type: label, id: value, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label, | ||
| value: String(value), | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement pagination for all API calls in propDefinitions
The options methods for various propDefinitions (adcodeId, customerTypeId, storeId, orderId, orderStatusId, orderAddressId, subscriptionId, emailTemplateId) fetch all records without pagination. This approach might lead to performance issues with large datasets.
Implement pagination for all API calls in the options methods. Update the corresponding get* methods in the methods section to accept page and limit parameters. Here's a general pattern to follow:
async options({ page = 1, limit = 100 }) {
const { entityPlural } = await this.getEntity({ page, limit });
return entityPlural.map(({
name: label, id: value,
}) => ({
label,
value: String(value),
}));
},Apply this pattern to all propDefinitions, adjusting the property names and mapping logic as needed for each entity type.
| updateOrder({ | ||
| orderId, ...args | ||
| } = {}) { | ||
| return this.app.put({ | ||
| path: `/orders/${orderId}`, | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apply the same fix to updateOrder method
The updateOrder method has the same potential issue as createOrder. Let's apply a similar fix.
Modify the updateOrder method:
updateOrder({
orderId, ...args
} = {}) {
+ const { data, ...rest } = args;
return this.app.put({
path: `/orders/${orderId}`,
- ...args,
+ data,
+ ...rest,
});
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| updateOrder({ | |
| orderId, ...args | |
| } = {}) { | |
| return this.app.put({ | |
| path: `/orders/${orderId}`, | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| updateOrder({ | |
| orderId, ...args | |
| } = {}) { | |
| const { data, ...rest } = args; | |
| return this.app.put({ | |
| path: `/orders/${orderId}`, | |
| data, | |
| ...rest, | |
| }); | |
| }, |
| if ( | ||
| isCreate | ||
| && ( | ||
| !customerId | ||
| || !orderStatusId | ||
| || !orderShippingAddressId | ||
| || !orderBillingAddressId | ||
| || !taxTotal | ||
| || !shippingTotal | ||
| ) | ||
| ) { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("The **Customer ID**, **Order Status ID**, **Order Shipping Address ID**, **Order Billing Address ID**, **Tax Total**, and **Shipping Total** are required to create a new order."); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify required fields validation
The current validation for required fields when creating an order uses multiple || conditions, which can reduce readability. Simplifying this validation will make the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
Refactor the validation using an array of required fields:
if (isCreate) {
- if (
- !customerId
- || !orderStatusId
- || !orderShippingAddressId
- || !orderBillingAddressId
- || !taxTotal
- || !shippingTotal
- ) {
+ const requiredFields = [
+ "customerId",
+ "orderStatusId",
+ "orderShippingAddressId",
+ "orderBillingAddressId",
+ "taxTotal",
+ "shippingTotal",
+ ];
+ const missingFields = requiredFields.filter((field) => !this[field]);
+ if (missingFields.length) {
- throw new ConfigurationError("The **Customer ID**, **Order Status ID**, **Order Shipping Address ID**, **Order Billing Address ID**, **Tax Total**, and **Shipping Total** are required to create a new order.");
+ throw new ConfigurationError(`The following fields are required to create a new order: ${missingFields.join(", ")}.`);
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ( | |
| isCreate | |
| && ( | |
| !customerId | |
| || !orderStatusId | |
| || !orderShippingAddressId | |
| || !orderBillingAddressId | |
| || !taxTotal | |
| || !shippingTotal | |
| ) | |
| ) { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError("The **Customer ID**, **Order Status ID**, **Order Shipping Address ID**, **Order Billing Address ID**, **Tax Total**, and **Shipping Total** are required to create a new order."); | |
| } | |
| if (isCreate) { | |
| const requiredFields = [ | |
| "customerId", | |
| "orderStatusId", | |
| "orderShippingAddressId", | |
| "orderBillingAddressId", | |
| "taxTotal", | |
| "shippingTotal", | |
| ]; | |
| const missingFields = requiredFields.filter((field) => !this[field]); | |
| if (missingFields.length) { | |
| throw new ConfigurationError(`The following fields are required to create a new order: ${missingFields.join(", ")}.`); | |
| } | |
| } |
jcortes
force-pushed
the
americommerce-new-componets
branch
from
7b093d2
to
242bfc6
Compare
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- components/americommerce/actions/change-order-status/change-order-status.mjs
- components/americommerce/actions/update-customer/update-customer.mjs
- components/americommerce/common/constants.mjs
- components/americommerce/package.json
- components/americommerce/sources/common/events.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/common/webhook.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/new-product-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-product-instant/test-event.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/new-valid-order-instant.mjs
- components/americommerce/sources/new-valid-order-instant/test-event.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/americommerce/americommerce.app.mjs (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports and basic structure are appropriate.The imports and basic app structure are well-defined for the Americommerce integration.
1-253: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvement.The Americommerce app implementation is well-structured and covers a wide range of functionalities. However, there are several areas where improvements can be made:
- Implement pagination in propDefinition options and entity retrieval methods to handle large datasets efficiently.
- Enhance error handling in the
_makeRequestmethod to provide better error logging and management.- Simplify and standardize the implementation of some methods, such as the
shippingMethodIdoptions and HTTP method wrappers.Addressing these points will improve the robustness, efficiency, and maintainability of the Americommerce app.
components/americommerce/actions/create-update-order/create-update-order.mjs (2)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and metadata look goodThe import statements and action metadata are well-defined and provide clear information about the action's purpose and functionality.
1-431: Overall assessment: Solid implementation with room for refinementThis action for creating or updating orders in Americommerce is comprehensive and well-structured. It covers a wide range of order attributes and handles both creation and update scenarios effectively. The code is generally well-organized and follows good practices.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive coverage of order attributes
- Clear separation of concerns (props, methods, run function)
- Good use of error handling and user feedback
Areas for improvement:
- Enhance prop definitions with better typing and grouping
- Improve method safety by explicitly defining request options
- Optimize the run function for better maintainability and efficiency
By implementing the suggested refinements, this action can become even more robust, maintainable, and efficient. Great work overall!
| customerId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Customer ID", | ||
| description: "The unique identifier for the customer. This ID is optional.", | ||
| async options({ filter = () => true }) { | ||
| const { customers } = await this.getCustomers(); | ||
| return customers | ||
| .filter(filter) | ||
| .map(({ | ||
| first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, id: value, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label: [ | ||
| firstName, | ||
| lastName, | ||
| ].filter(Boolean).join(" "), | ||
| value, | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing pagination for customerId options.
The options method for customerId fetches all customers without pagination. This might cause performance issues if there are many customers.
Consider implementing pagination in the getCustomers method and updating the options method accordingly. Here's a suggested implementation:
async options({ page = 1, limit = 100, filter = () => true }) {
const { customers } = await this.getCustomers({ page, limit });
return customers
.filter(filter)
.map(({
first_name: firstName, last_name: lastName, id: value,
}) => ({
label: [firstName, lastName].filter(Boolean).join(" "),
value: String(value),
}));
},Update the getCustomers method to accept page and limit parameters and use them in the API request.
| shippingMethodId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Shipping Method ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the shipping method.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options({ mapper = ({ id }) => String(id) }) { | ||
| const { shipments } = await this.getOrderShipments(); | ||
| return shipments.map(mapper); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify shippingMethodId options method.
The options method for shippingMethodId uses a custom mapper function, which might be unnecessary.
Consider simplifying the options method by removing the custom mapper and using a standard mapping approach:
async options() {
const { shipments } = await this.getOrderShipments();
return shipments.map(({ id, shipping_method: label }) => ({
label,
value: String(id),
}));
},This approach is more consistent with other propDefinitions and doesn't require a custom mapper function.
| subscriptionId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Subscription ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the subscription.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| async options() { | ||
| const { subscriptions } = await this.getSubscriptions(); | ||
| return subscriptions.map(({ id }) => String(id)); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add labels to subscriptionId options.
The options method for subscriptionId only returns the ID as both the label and value, which might not be user-friendly.
Consider adding a meaningful label to the options:
async options() {
const { subscriptions } = await this.getSubscriptions();
return subscriptions.map(({ id, name }) => ({
label: name || `Subscription ${id}`,
value: String(id),
}));
},This change assumes that subscriptions have a name property. If not, consider using another meaningful property or combining multiple properties to create a descriptive label.
| _makeRequest({ | ||
| $ = this, path, headers, ...args | ||
| } = {}) { | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| ...args, | ||
| url: this.getUrl(path), | ||
| headers: this.getHeaders(headers), | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in _makeRequest method.
The _makeRequest method currently doesn't include any error handling, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections if API requests fail.
Consider adding a try-catch block to handle potential errors:
_makeRequest({
$ = this, path, headers, ...args
} = {}) {
try {
return axios($, {
...args,
url: this.getUrl(path),
headers: this.getHeaders(headers),
});
} catch (error) {
console.error(`API request failed: ${error.message}`);
throw error;
}
},This will provide better error logging and allow for custom error handling if needed.
| getCustomers(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/customers", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getAdCodes(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/adcodes", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getCustomerTypes(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/customer_types", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getStores(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/stores", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getOrders(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/orders", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getOrderStatuses(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/order_statuses", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getOrderAddresses(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/order_addresses", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getOrderShipments(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/order_shipments", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getSubscriptions(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/subscriptions", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| getEmailTemplates(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| path: "/email_templates", | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add pagination support to all entity retrieval methods.
The entity retrieval methods (getCustomers, getAdCodes, etc.) currently don't support pagination, which may lead to performance issues with large datasets.
Update all entity retrieval methods to support pagination. Here's a general pattern to follow:
getEntity({ page = 1, limit = 100, ...args } = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
...args,
path: `/entity?page=${page}&limit=${limit}`,
});
},Apply this pattern to all entity retrieval methods (getCustomers, getAdCodes, getCustomerTypes, getStores, getOrders, getOrderStatuses, getOrderAddresses, getOrderShipments, getSubscriptions, getEmailTemplates). This will allow for more efficient data retrieval and better performance when dealing with large datasets.
| post(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| put(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| method: "PUT", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| delete(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| ...args, | ||
| method: "DELETE", | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider consolidating HTTP methods.
The post, put, and delete methods are thin wrappers around _makeRequest. This may not be necessary and could be simplified.
If there are no additional customizations in these methods, consider removing them and specifying the HTTP method directly when calling _makeRequest:
// Instead of:
post(args = {}) {
return this._makeRequest({
...args,
method: "POST",
});
},
// Use directly:
this._makeRequest({
...args,
method: "POST",
});This would reduce code duplication and simplify the API surface of the app.
| giftMessage: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Gift Message", | ||
| description: "The gift message for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| publicComments: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Public Comments", | ||
| description: "Public comments about the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| instructions: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Instructions", | ||
| description: "Instructions for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| sourceGroup: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Source Group", | ||
| description: "The source group for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| fromSubscriptionId: { | ||
| label: "From Subscription ID", | ||
| description: "The ID of the subscription.", | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "subscriptionId", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| discountedShippingTotal: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Discounted Shipping Total", | ||
| description: "The discounted shipping total for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| orderNumber: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Order Number", | ||
| description: "The order number.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| couponCode: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Coupon Code", | ||
| description: "The coupon code for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| orderType: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Order Type", | ||
| description: "The type of order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| expires: { | ||
| type: "boolean", | ||
| label: "Expires", | ||
| description: "Whether the order expires.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| campaignCode: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Campaign Code", | ||
| description: "The campaign code for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| rewardPointsCredited: { | ||
| type: "boolean", | ||
| label: "Reward Points Credited", | ||
| description: "Whether the reward points are credited.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| channel: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Channel", | ||
| description: "The channel for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| options: [ | ||
| "Online", | ||
| "InStore", | ||
| "Chat", | ||
| "Phone", | ||
| "Email", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| device: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Device", | ||
| description: "The device for the order.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| dueDate: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Due Date", | ||
| description: "The due date for the order. Eg. `2021-05-14`", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Props are comprehensive, but consider a few enhancements
The props definition is thorough and covers a wide range of order attributes. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
- Consider using
numbertype instead ofstringfor numeric fields likesubtotal,taxTotal, etc., for better type safety. - Group related props (e.g., address-related, totals-related) using prop groups for better organization.
- Add validation for fields like
dueDateto ensure correct date format.
Example for grouping and type change:
totals: {
type: "object",
properties: {
subtotal: {
type: "number",
label: "Subtotal",
description: "The subtotal of the order.",
optional: true,
},
// ... other total-related props
},
},| methods: { | ||
| createOrder(args = {}) { | ||
| return this.app.post({ | ||
| path: "/orders", | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| updateOrder({ | ||
| orderId, ...args | ||
| } = {}) { | ||
| return this.app.put({ | ||
| path: `/orders/${orderId}`, | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance method safety by explicitly defining request options
In both createOrder and updateOrder methods, spreading args directly into the request options could potentially overwrite important properties like path or data. Consider explicitly defining the request options to prevent this:
createOrder(args = {}) {
const { data, ...rest } = args;
return this.app.post({
path: "/orders",
data,
...rest,
});
},
updateOrder({ orderId, ...args } = {}) {
const { data, ...rest } = args;
return this.app.put({
path: `/orders/${orderId}`,
data,
...rest,
});
},This approach ensures that path and data are not accidentally overwritten by the spread operation.
| handlingTotal, | ||
| isPaymentOrderOnly, | ||
| selectedShippingProviderService, | ||
| additionalFees, | ||
| adcodeId, | ||
| isGift, | ||
| giftMessage, | ||
| publicComments, | ||
| instructions, | ||
| sourceGroup, | ||
| fromSubscriptionId, | ||
| discountedShippingTotal, | ||
| orderNumber, | ||
| couponCode, | ||
| orderType, | ||
| expires, | ||
| campaignCode, | ||
| rewardPointsCredited, | ||
| channel, | ||
| device, | ||
| dueDate, | ||
| } = this; | ||
|
|
||
| const isCreate = !orderId; | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| isCreate | ||
| && ( | ||
| !customerId | ||
| || !orderStatusId | ||
| || !orderShippingAddressId | ||
| || !orderBillingAddressId | ||
| || !taxTotal | ||
| || !shippingTotal | ||
| ) | ||
| ) { | ||
| throw new ConfigurationError("The **Customer ID**, **Order Status ID**, **Order Shipping Address ID**, **Order Billing Address ID**, **Tax Total**, and **Shipping Total** are required to create a new order."); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const data = { | ||
| customer_id: customerId, | ||
| order_status_id: orderStatusId, | ||
| order_shipping_address_id: orderShippingAddressId, | ||
| order_billing_address_id: orderBillingAddressId, | ||
| customer_type_id: customerTypeId, | ||
| special_instructions: specialInstructions, | ||
| subtotal, | ||
| tax_total: taxTotal, | ||
| shipping_total: shippingTotal, | ||
| discount_total: discountTotal, | ||
| grand_total: grandTotal, | ||
| cost_total: costTotal, | ||
| selected_shipping_method: selectedShippingMethod, | ||
| referrer, | ||
| admin_comments: adminComments, | ||
| source, | ||
| search_phrase: searchPhrase, | ||
| store_id: storeId, | ||
| is_ppc: isPpc, | ||
| ppc_keyword: ppcKeyword, | ||
| handling_total: handlingTotal, | ||
| is_payment_order_only: isPaymentOrderOnly, | ||
| selected_shipping_provider_service: selectedShippingProviderService, | ||
| additional_fees: additionalFees, | ||
| adcode_id: adcodeId, | ||
| is_gift: isGift, | ||
| gift_message: giftMessage, | ||
| public_comments: publicComments, | ||
| instructions, | ||
| source_group: sourceGroup, | ||
| from_subscription_id: fromSubscriptionId, | ||
| discounted_shipping_total: discountedShippingTotal, | ||
| order_number: orderNumber, | ||
| coupon_code: couponCode, | ||
| order_type: orderType, | ||
| expires, | ||
| campaign_code: campaignCode, | ||
| reward_points_credited: rewardPointsCredited, | ||
| channel, | ||
| device, | ||
| due_date: dueDate, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| if (isCreate) { | ||
| const response = await createOrder({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created the order with ID \`${response.id}\`.`); | ||
| return response; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await updateOrder({ | ||
| $, | ||
| orderId, | ||
| data, | ||
| }); | ||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated the order with ID \`${response.id}\`.`); | ||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize run function for better maintainability and efficiency
The run function is comprehensive, but there are a few areas for improvement:
-
Simplify required fields validation:
if (isCreate) { const requiredFields = ["customerId", "orderStatusId", "orderShippingAddressId", "orderBillingAddressId", "taxTotal", "shippingTotal"]; const missingFields = requiredFields.filter(field => !this[field]); if (missingFields.length) { throw new ConfigurationError(`The following fields are required to create a new order: ${missingFields.join(", ")}.`); } }
-
Filter out undefined properties in the data object:
const data = { // ... (your existing data object) }; Object.keys(data).forEach(key => data[key] === undefined && delete data[key]);
-
Good practice: The use of
$.export("$summary", ...)provides clear feedback to the user.
These changes will make the code more maintainable and efficient by reducing redundancy and preventing the sending of undefined properties to the API.
WHY
Resolves #14198
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores