New Components - smartsuite #14273
New Components - smartsuite #14273
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce new functionalities for the SmartSuite application, including actions for creating and finding records, as well as webhook sources for new record creation and updates. Several files have been added to encapsulate these features, while others, such as the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
components/smartsuite/sources/record-updated-instant/record-updated-instant.mjs (2)
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured module export with appropriate metadata.The module export and metadata are well-defined, providing clear information about the component's purpose and behavior. The use of a unique key and proper versioning is commendable.
Consider adding
propsto allow users to configure specific aspects of the record update tracking, such as the ability to filter updates based on certain criteria. This could enhance the flexibility of the component.
12-20: LGTM: Well-implemented methods for event handling.The
getEventType()andgetSummary()methods are concise and align well with the component's purpose. The use of object destructuring ingetSummary()is a good modern JavaScript practice.Consider adding error handling in
getSummary()to gracefully handle cases whererecord_event_dataordata.record_idmight be undefined. For example:getSummary({ record_event_data: data }) { return `Record updated with ID: ${data?.record_id ?? 'Unknown'}`; },This change would prevent potential runtime errors and provide a fallback for unexpected data structures.
components/smartsuite/sources/new-record-created-instant/new-record-created-instant.mjs (4)
5-11: LGTM: Properties are well-defined for a Pipedream source component.The properties are correctly set up for a new SmartSuite record creation source. The use of
dedupe: "unique"ensures that duplicate events are filtered out, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.Consider adding an
app: "smartsuite"property to explicitly link this component to the SmartSuite app. This can improve discoverability and organization within the Pipedream ecosystem.
12-20: LGTM: Custom methods are well-implemented.The
getEventType()andgetSummary()methods are concise and serve their purposes well. They align with the component's objective of emitting events for new record creation.Consider adding basic error handling in the
getSummary()method. For example:getSummary({ record_event_data: data }) { if (!data || !data.record_id) { return "New record created (ID unavailable)"; } return `New record created with ID: ${data.record_id}`; },This would make the component more robust in case of unexpected data structures.
21-21: LGTM: Sample emit is included.Including a
sampleEmitis a good practice for Pipedream components, as it helps with testing and provides example data for users.Consider adding a brief comment above this line to explain the purpose of
sampleEmit, e.g.:// Sample emit for testing and providing example event data sampleEmit,This would improve code readability and maintainability.
1-22: Overall: Well-implemented Pipedream source component for SmartSuite.This new component effectively implements a source for new record creation events in SmartSuite. It follows Pipedream's component structure and best practices, leveraging common functionality while providing specific behavior for SmartSuite integration.
Key strengths:
- Clear and focused implementation
- Proper use of ES modules
- Concise custom methods
- Inclusion of sample emit for testing
The component aligns well with the PR objectives, providing the "new-record-instant" webhook source as specified in issue #13197.
To further enhance this component:
- Consider implementing proper error handling for edge cases.
- Add inline documentation for better maintainability.
- Ensure that this component integrates smoothly with the other planned SmartSuite components (e.g., "updated-record-instant", "create-record", etc.) for a cohesive user experience.
components/smartsuite/sources/new-record-created-instant/test-event.mjs (4)
1-9: LGTM! Consider adding a version field for future compatibility.The top-level structure of the test event object is well-organized and contains essential metadata. The use of UUIDs and ISO 8601 timestamp format is commendable.
Consider adding a
versionfield to the top-level object. This can help with backwards compatibility if the event structure changes in the future:export default { + "version": "1.0", "webhook_id": "2f7cc6e0-b709-4b04-964a-3706c89c78e3", // ... rest of the object };
10-70: LGTM! Consider standardizing date field names for consistency.The
record_event_datasection is well-structured and comprehensive, providing a detailed representation of a newly created record.For consistency, consider standardizing the naming of date-related fields. For example:
"data": { - "last_updated": { + "updated_at": { "on": "2023-06-21T21:14:06.247000Z", "by": "63a1f65723aaf6bcb564b1f1", }, // ... other fields - "first_created": { + "created_at": { "on": "2023-06-21T21:14:06.247000Z", "by": "63a1f65723aaf6bcb564b1f1", }, },This change aligns with common conventions and improves readability.
71-78: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity on specific fields.The
ctxsection provides valuable context information about the event processing. The inclusion of batch information and processing details is commendable.To improve clarity, consider adding comments for fields that might not be immediately clear to developers:
"ctx": { "change_id": "ba1ffa93-0c51-48ab-aff2-64d9128d6c35", "change_size": 1, "batch_id": "65832e55206fdfd247b84abd", "batch_size": 1, - "source": "UNKNOWN", + "source": "UNKNOWN", // Possible values: API, UI, IMPORT, etc. - "handler": "INTERACTIVE", + "handler": "INTERACTIVE", // Possible values: INTERACTIVE, BATCH, SCHEDULED, etc. },These comments can help developers understand the possible values and their meanings without referring to external documentation.
1-79: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment explaining the file's purpose.The overall structure of the file is excellent, providing a comprehensive example of a new record creation event. This will be valuable for testing and documentation purposes.
To improve developer understanding, consider adding a brief comment at the beginning of the file explaining its purpose:
+/** + * This file contains a sample event object representing a new record creation in SmartSuite. + * It can be used for testing webhook handlers, documentation, and as a reference for the event structure. + */ export default { // ... rest of the object };This comment will help developers quickly understand the file's purpose and how it can be used.
components/smartsuite/sources/record-updated-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
1-9: Consider using a more realistic account_idThe webhook and event identification section looks good overall. However, for better test coverage, consider replacing the placeholder "WORKSPACE_ID" with a more realistic account_id format, such as a UUID or the actual format used in the SmartSuite API.
components/smartsuite/actions/find-records/find-records.mjs (1)
63-67: Provide feedback when no records are foundCurrently, when no records are found, there is no summary or feedback to the user.
Consider adding an else clause to inform the user when no records match the search criteria:
if (items?.length) { $.export("$summary", `Successfully found ${items.length} record${items.length === 1 ? "" : "s"}`); + } else { + $.export("$summary", "No records found matching the criteria."); }components/smartsuite/sources/common/base.mjs (4)
17-38: Add error handling for thecreateWebhookAPI callIn the
activatehook, the call tothis.smartsuite.createWebhookassumes that the API will always succeed and return data in the expected format. To prevent potential runtime errors, consider adding error handling to manage cases where the API call fails or returns unexpected data.You can wrap the API call in a try-catch block:
async activate() { + try { const { webhook: { webhook_id: hookId } } = await this.smartsuite.createWebhook({ data: { webhook: { filter: { solution: {}, }, kinds: [ this.getEventType(), ], locator: { account_id: this.smartsuite.$auth.account_id, solution_id: this.solutionId, }, notification_status: { enabled: { url: this.http.endpoint, }, }, }, }, }); this._setHookId(hookId); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to create webhook:", error); + throw error; + } }
41-49: Add error handling for thedeleteWebhookAPI callSimilarly, in the
deactivatehook, the call tothis.smartsuite.deleteWebhookcould benefit from error handling to manage possible failures, ensuring that any issues during deactivation are duly noted.Consider the following modification:
async deactivate() { const hookId = this._getHookId(); if (hookId) { + try { await this.smartsuite.deleteWebhook({ data: { webhook_id: hookId, }, }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to delete webhook:", error); + throw error; + } } }
68-68: Usenew Date()for reliable timestamp parsingUsing
Date.parse(event.event_at)may lead to inconsistent results across different environments if the date string format isn't universally recognized. To ensure consistent parsing, usenew Date(event.event_at).getTime().Apply this change:
ts: Date.parse(event.event_at), +// Use new Date for reliable parsing -ts: Date.parse(event.event_at), +ts: new Date(event.event_at).getTime(),
91-91: Handle cases wherenextPageTokenis undefinedWhen setting the next page token, if
nextPageTokenisundefined, it may lead to issues in subsequent runs. Ensure that you handle this scenario appropriately.Modify the code to set the page token only if it's defined:
-this._setPageToken(nextPageToken); +if (nextPageToken) { + this._setPageToken(nextPageToken); +}components/smartsuite/smartsuite.app.mjs (1)
60-62: Consider parameterizing the base URL for flexibilityFor better adaptability between different environments (e.g., staging, production), consider parameterizing the base URL
_baseUrlusing environment variables or configuration settings.Example modification:
_baseUrl() { - return "https://app.smartsuite.com/api/v1"; + return process.env.SMARTSUITE_API_BASE_URL || "https://app.smartsuite.com/api/v1"; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- components/smartsuite/.gitignore (0 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/actions/create-record/create-record.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/actions/find-records/find-records.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/app/smartsuite.app.ts (0 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/smartsuite.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/sources/new-record-created-instant/new-record-created-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/sources/new-record-created-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/sources/record-updated-instant/record-updated-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/smartsuite/sources/record-updated-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/smartsuite/.gitignore
- components/smartsuite/app/smartsuite.app.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (17)
components/smartsuite/package.json (4)
3-3: Version bump looks appropriate.The version update from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0 aligns with the addition of new components for smartsuite. This minor version bump correctly indicates new features without breaking changes.
15-17: Dependency addition looks appropriate.The addition of "@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3" as a dependency is likely related to the new smartsuite components being added. This looks appropriate given the context of the changes.
To ensure this dependency is being used correctly, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of @pipedream/platform in the project # Search for imports of @pipedream/platform echo "Searching for imports of @pipedream/platform:" rg --type js "from ['\"]@pipedream/platform" # List files that use @pipedream/platform echo "Files using @pipedream/platform:" rg --type js --files-with-matches "from ['\"]@pipedream/platform"This will help confirm that the new dependency is being utilized in the project.
5-5: Verify main entry point consistency.The main entry point has been changed from "dist/app/smartsuite.app.mjs" to "smartsuite.app.mjs". Please ensure that:
- The file "smartsuite.app.mjs" exists in the correct location.
- This change is consistent with any build processes or scripts that may reference this file.
- Other parts of the project that import this module are updated accordingly.
Run the following script to verify the file existence and any imports:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of smartsuite.app.mjs and its imports # Test 1: Check if the file exists echo "Checking if smartsuite.app.mjs exists:" fd --type file --glob 'smartsuite.app.mjs' # Test 2: Search for imports of smartsuite.app.mjs echo "Searching for imports of smartsuite.app.mjs:" rg --type js "from ['\"].*smartsuite\.app" -g '!package.json'
14-14: Verify package contents after removal of "files" field.The "files" field specifying ["dist"] has been removed. This change, along with the main entry point modification, suggests a significant restructuring of the project. Please ensure that:
- All necessary files are still included in the package when it's published.
- No unnecessary files are accidentally included in the package.
- This change is intentional and aligns with the new project structure.
To verify the package contents, you can run the following command in your local environment:
This will list all files that would be included in the package without actually creating it.
components/smartsuite/sources/record-updated-instant/record-updated-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate imports for module functionality.The import statements are well-structured, importing common functionality and a sample event emitter. The use of .mjs extension indicates ES modules, which is a good practice for modern JavaScript development.
21-21: LGTM: Good inclusion of sample event emitter.The inclusion of
sampleEmitis a good practice for testing and documentation purposes. Separating it into its own file keeps the main component file clean and focused.
1-22: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.This file successfully implements the "updated-record-instant" webhook source as outlined in the linked issue #13197. The component is well-structured, modular, and follows good JavaScript practices. It provides the necessary functionality to emit new events when existing records are updated in SmartSuite.
To ensure consistency with other components in the PR, let's verify the structure:
This script will help ensure that the structure and versioning are consistent across all SmartSuite components introduced in this PR.
components/smartsuite/sources/new-record-created-instant/new-record-created-instant.mjs (1)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and use modern ES module syntax.The imports from the common base and test event file are correctly structured using ES module syntax (.mjs extension). This approach aligns with modern JavaScript practices and promotes better code organization.
components/smartsuite/sources/record-updated-instant/test-event.mjs (4)
1-79: LGTM: Well-structured test event objectThe overall structure of the exported object is well-organized and contains all the necessary information for a record update event in SmartSuite. This includes webhook details, event information, record data, and context.
10-69: Clarify 'previous' field and consider simplifying 'description'The
record_event_datasection is comprehensive and well-structured. However:
The
previousfield is empty. Is this intentional for this test case? If not, consider adding sample data to test scenarios where previous data is relevant.The
descriptionfield (lines 35-42) contains a complex structure with empty content. For simplicity in testing, you might want to include a basic content example or consider if this level of detail is necessary for all test cases.
71-78: Clarify the "UNKNOWN" source in the contextThe context (
ctx) section provides useful metadata about the change event. However, thesourceis set to "UNKNOWN" (line 76). Is this intentional for testing purposes, or should it reflect a real-world scenario? Consider using a more specific source if appropriate for comprehensive testing.
1-79: Well-structured test event aligning with PR objectivesThis test event file is well-structured and comprehensive, providing a good representation of a record update event in SmartSuite. It aligns well with the PR objectives, specifically supporting the "updated-record-instant" webhook source mentioned in the linked issue #13197.
The file covers all necessary aspects of an update event, including webhook details, record data, and change context. While there are a few minor points that could be clarified or improved (as mentioned in previous comments), overall, this file serves its purpose effectively for testing the SmartSuite integration.
components/smartsuite/actions/find-records/find-records.mjs (1)
58-59: Verify the 'operator' value in the filterThe
operatorin the filter is set to"and". Ensure that the SmartSuite API accepts the operator in lowercase. Some APIs require uppercase operators like"AND".Please check the API documentation to confirm the correct casing for the
operatorvalue.components/smartsuite/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
71-76: EnsuregetEventType()andgetSummary()are overriddenThe methods
getEventType()andgetSummary()throw errors indicating they are not implemented. This is appropriate for a base module intended for extension. However, to prevent runtime errors, make sure that all derived components override these methods.Consider adding documentation comments to highlight that these methods must be implemented by subclasses:
getEventType() { + // Must be implemented by subclass throw new Error("getEventType is not implemented"); }, getSummary() { + // Must be implemented by subclass throw new Error("getSummary is not implemented"); },components/smartsuite/smartsuite.app.mjs (3)
27-43: Ensure 'fieldIds' prop correctly handles dependenciesThe
fieldIdsprop depends ontableIdto fetch the list of fields. Ensure thattableIdis selected beforefieldIdsto avoid any runtime issues.Confirm that the property ordering and dependencies are handled correctly in the component configuration.
63-65: Verify the base webhook URL for correctnessThe
_baseWebhookUrlmethod returns the base URL for webhook API requests. Please ensure that the URL is accurate and matches the Smartsuite API specifications, as incorrect URLs can lead to failed API calls.Run the following script to check for the webhook URL in configuration or documentation files:
68-69: Verify the correctness of the 'ACCOUNT-ID' headerThe header
"ACCOUNT-ID"is used for authentication. Please verify that the casing and format of the header name match the API's requirements, as some APIs might expect header names in a specific case (e.g.,Account-ID).Run the following script to check for documentation or examples of the header usage:
Resolves #13197
Summary by CodeRabbit
.gitignorefile, improving file tracking.package.jsonto reflect new versioning and dependencies, ensuring clarity in package management.