[Components] fullenrich #14282
[Components] fullenrich #14282
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces new modules and methods for enriching contact information and retrieving enrichment results within the Fullenrich platform. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (3)
9-22: Props look good, consider adding input validation.The props are well-defined with clear descriptions. However, consider adding input validation for the
enrichmentIdto ensure it meets any specific format requirements (if any) before making the API call.You could add a
patternproperty to theenrichmentIdprop if there's a specific format it should follow. For example:enrichmentId: { type: "string", label: "Enrichment ID", description: "The ID of the enrichment to get the result for.", pattern: "^[a-zA-Z0-9-]+$", // Adjust this pattern as needed },
23-32: Method looks good, consider adding error handling.The
getEnrichmentResultmethod is well-structured and correctly uses the app's request-making functionality. However, consider adding error handling to manage potential API request failures gracefully.You could wrap the API call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors. For example:
methods: { async getEnrichmentResult({ enrichmentId, ...args } = {}) { try { return await this.app._makeRequest({ path: `/contact/enrich/bulk/${enrichmentId}`, ...args, }); } catch (error) { console.error(`Error fetching enrichment result: ${error.message}`); throw error; // Re-throw the error for the caller to handle } }, },
33-50: Run method looks good, consider adding error handling and response validation.The
runmethod is well-structured and correctly uses thegetEnrichmentResultmethod. The summary message is informative. However, consider adding error handling and response validation to improve robustness.You could add error handling and response validation like this:
async run({ $ }) { const { getEnrichmentResult, enrichmentId, forceResults, } = this; try { const response = await getEnrichmentResult({ $, enrichmentId, params: { forceResults, }, }); // Validate the response if (!response || !response.id) { throw new Error('Invalid response from the enrichment API'); } $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched enrichment result with ID \`${response.id}\`.`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch enrichment result: ${error.message}`); throw error; // Re-throw the error for the platform to handle } },components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (1)
7-9: Ensure proper URL construction ingetUrlmethodThe
getUrlmethod concatenates the base URL with the providedpath. To prevent potential issues with missing or duplicate slashes, consider ensuring thatpathalways starts with a slash or usingURLorpathutilities to construct the URL safely.components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (1)
12-16: Clarify the 'Name' property descriptionThe
Nameproperty's description currently states "The name of the action," which may cause confusion since the action's name is already defined in the action metadata. If this property is intended to represent the name of the enrichment job or request, consider updating the description to "The name of the enrichment job" to provide clearer context for users.Apply this diff to update the description:
label: "Name", - description: "The name of the action.", + description: "The name of the enrichment job.",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/fullenrich/package.json (4)
3-3: Version update looks good.The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 aligns with semantic versioning principles and reflects the addition of new features (Enrich Contact and Get Enrichment Result actions) as mentioned in the PR objectives.
14-14: PublishConfig update is appropriate.Setting the
accessto "public" inpublishConfigis a good practice. It ensures the package will be publicly accessible when published to npm, preventing any accidental private publishing.
Line range hint
1-18: Overall, the package.json changes look good.The updates to version, publishConfig, and dependencies are appropriate and align with the PR objectives. The version increment reflects the addition of new features, the public access setting ensures proper npm publishing, and the new dependency is likely necessary for the implemented features. Just ensure to verify the @pipedream/platform version as suggested earlier.
15-17: Dependencies addition is appropriate, but verify the version.The addition of
@pipedream/platformas a dependency is likely necessary for the new features. However, please verify that 3.0.3 is the latest stable version of@pipedream/platform. If a newer stable version is available, consider updating to it.Run the following script to check for the latest version of @pipedream/platform:
✅ Verification successful
Unable to verify the latest version of
@pipedream/platformdue to a script error. Please run the following script to retrieve the latest version:
Dependency version confirmed and up-to-date.
The specified version of
@pipedream/platform(3.0.3) is the latest stable version. No update is required.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the latest version of @pipedream/platform # Test: Fetch the latest version of @pipedream/platform npm view @pipedream/platform version # Note: Compare the output with the version specified in package.json (3.0.3) # If the versions differ, consider updating to the latest stable versionLength of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the latest version of @pipedream/platform using curl and jq curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@pipedream/platform | jq -r '.["dist-tags"].latest'Length of output: 94
components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.The import statement and action metadata are well-defined. The description includes a helpful link to the documentation, which is a good practice.
1-51: Overall implementation looks good and aligns with PR objectives.The "Get Enrichment Result" action is well-implemented and aligns with the objectives outlined in issue #14275. It provides the necessary functionality to retrieve enrichment results for specified contacts.
Key points:
- The action correctly interacts with the fullenrich API.
- It includes appropriate parameters for the enrichment ID and force results option.
- The implementation is well-structured and follows good coding practices.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Add input validation for the
enrichmentIdparameter.- Implement error handling in the
getEnrichmentResultmethod.- Add response validation and error handling in the
runmethod.These improvements will enhance the robustness and reliability of the action.
To ensure the implementation aligns with the fullenrich service documentation, please run the following script:
components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (1)
13-13: Verify the correctness of the API key referencePlease confirm that
this.$auth.api_keycorrectly references the API key provided by the user. An incorrect reference could lead to authentication failures when making API requests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/fullenrich/package.json (1)
15-17: Dependencies addition is appropriate.The inclusion of @pipedream/platform as a dependency is suitable for implementing the new contact enrichment functionality.
Consider adding a
^prefix to the version number (i.e.,"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3") to allow for compatible updates. This follows npm best practices for dependency management.components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (1)
17-25: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The
_makeRequestmethod is well-implemented. It centralizes the request logic, uses thegetUrlandgetHeadersmethods correctly, and allows for additional axios options.Consider adding error handling to provide more context in case of API errors. For example:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, headers, ...args } = {}) { return axios($, { ...args, url: this.getUrl(path), headers: this.getHeaders(headers), }).catch(err => { const statusCode = err.response?.status; const statusText = err.response?.statusText; throw new Error(`Fullenrich API request failed: ${statusCode} ${statusText}`); }); },This would provide more informative error messages for debugging purposes.
components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (4)
1-8: LGTM! Consider semantic versioning for future updates.The import statement and action metadata look good. The documentation link in the description is helpful for users.
For future updates, consider using semantic versioning (e.g., "1.0.0" instead of "0.0.1") to better reflect the stability and feature completeness of the action.
9-22: LGTM! Consider adding input validation for enrichmentId.The props definition looks good. The descriptions are clear and the optional flag for forceResults is appropriate.
Consider adding input validation for the enrichmentId prop to ensure it meets any specific format requirements. For example:
enrichmentId: { type: "string", label: "Enrichment ID", description: "The ID of the enrichment to get the result for.", validate: (value) => { if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-]+$/.test(value)) { return "Enrichment ID must contain only alphanumeric characters and hyphens."; } }, },
23-32: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The getEnrichmentResult method is well-structured and uses the app._makeRequest method appropriately.
Consider adding error handling to provide more informative error messages. For example:
getEnrichmentResult({ enrichmentId, ...args } = {}) { if (!enrichmentId) { throw new Error("Enrichment ID is required"); } return this.app._makeRequest({ path: `/contact/enrich/bulk/${enrichmentId}`, ...args, }).catch(error => { throw new Error(`Failed to get enrichment result: ${error.message}`); }); },
33-50: LGTM! Consider adding more robust error handling.The run method is well-structured and provides a clear summary of the operation.
Consider adding more robust error handling to provide clearer feedback in case of failures. For example:
async run({ $ }) { const { getEnrichmentResult, enrichmentId, forceResults, } = this; try { const response = await getEnrichmentResult({ $, enrichmentId, params: { forceResults, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully fetched enrichment result with ID \`${response.id}\`.`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to fetch enrichment result: ${error.message}`); throw error; } },components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (2)
84-85: Remove markdown formatting from error messagesThe error message includes markdown formatting with
**to indicate bold text. Since error messages are typically displayed as plain text, the**characters will appear in the output, which may confuse users. Please remove the markdown formatting from the error messages.Apply this diff to adjust the error messages:
- throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either a **Domain** or a **Company Name**."); + throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide either a Domain or a Company Name."); + } + if (!firstname || !lastname) { + throw new ConfigurationError("You must provide both a First Name and a Last Name."); }
51-60: Set default values forEnrich FieldsThe description mentions that by default, the action enriches contact emails and phones, but there's no default value set in the code. Consider setting a default value for
enrichFieldsto reflect this behavior.Apply this diff to set the default values:
+ default: [ + "contact.emails", + "contact.phones", + ],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
components/fullenrich/package.json (3)
3-3: Version update looks good.The increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 follows semantic versioning principles and correctly reflects the addition of new features as described in the PR objectives.
12-14: PublishConfig change is appropriate.Setting the "access" to "public" in the publishConfig ensures that the package will be publicly accessible when published to npm. This is suitable for a component intended for wide use.
Line range hint
1-18: Overall package.json changes align well with PR objectives.The updates to version, dependencies, and publishConfig accurately reflect the addition of new contact enrichment functionality as outlined in the PR objectives. These changes follow npm best practices and prepare the package for public use.
components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (2)
10-16: LGTM: Well-implemented header construction.The
getHeadersmethod is well-implemented. It correctly sets the required headers and allows for additional headers to be passed and merged. The use of the spread operator for merging headers is a good practice.
26-30: LGTM: Concise and correct implementation.The
postmethod is well-implemented. It correctly uses the_makeRequestmethod with the POST method and allows for additional arguments to be passed.components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (1)
1-51: Great implementation! Aligns well with PR objectives.The
get-enrichment-resultaction is well-implemented and aligns perfectly with the objectives outlined in issue #14275. It provides a clear interface for retrieving enrichment results and includes helpful documentation links.Key strengths:
- Clear structure and organization
- Appropriate use of Pipedream action patterns
- Flexibility with optional parameters
Suggestions for future improvements:
- Implement more robust error handling
- Add input validation for the enrichmentId
- Consider using semantic versioning for future updates
Overall, this implementation provides a solid foundation for the fullenrich component's enrichment retrieval functionality.
components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jcortes
force-pushed
the
fullenrich-new-component
branch
from
2f75e5d
to
4808b89
Compare
jcortes
force-pushed
the
fullenrich-new-component
branch
from
4808b89
to
853628a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (1)
12-16: Consider renaming the 'name' prop to 'enrichmentName' for clarity.The current 'name' prop might be confused with the action's name. Renaming it to 'enrichmentName' would make its purpose clearer and distinguish it from the action's name property.
Apply this diff to rename the prop:
- name: { + enrichmentName: { type: "string", - label: "Name", - description: "The name of the action.", + label: "Enrichment Name", + description: "The name of the enrichment process.", },Remember to update all references to 'name' in the code to 'enrichmentName'.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/fullenrich/package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- components/fullenrich/actions/get-enrichment-result/get-enrichment-result.mjs
- components/fullenrich/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
components/fullenrich/actions/enrich-contact/enrich-contact.mjs (5)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and action metadata look good.The imports and the default export declaration are well-structured and include all necessary metadata for a Pipedream action. The inclusion of a documentation link in the description is particularly helpful.
10-61: LGTM: Props are well-defined and structured.The props are comprehensively defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The use of optional flags and the options array for enrichFields is particularly good.
62-69: LGTM: The enrichContacts method is well-implemented.The method is concise and flexible, allowing for additional arguments to be passed through. It correctly utilizes the app's post method for the API request.
1-108: Overall, the implementation looks good with a few minor improvements needed.The enrich-contact action is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. Please address the following points:
- Rename the 'name' prop to 'enrichmentName' for clarity.
- Add validation for 'First Name' and 'Last Name'.
- Change the 'datas' property to 'data' in the API request.
- Conditionally include the webhook_url in the API request.
Once these changes are made, the implementation will be robust and ready for use.
90-91: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionInclude webhook_url in the API request only if provided.
Currently, webhook_url is always included in the API request data, even when it's not provided. Consider including it only if webhookUrl is supplied to avoid sending undefined values.
Apply this diff to conditionally include webhook_url:
- webhook_url: webhookUrl, + ...(webhookUrl && { webhook_url: webhookUrl }),Likely invalid or redundant comment.
components/fullenrich/fullenrich.app.mjs (4)
7-9: Consider making the base URL configurable.
17-25: Implement error handling in_makeRequestmethod.
26-30: Extend HTTP method support for versatility.
1-30: Code changes look good to me.The new methods
getUrl,getHeaders,_makeRequest, andpostare well-implemented and enhance the module's functionality for handling HTTP requests.
WHY
Resolves #14275
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
fullenrichapp with new methods for constructing API requests and simplifying POST operations.Bug Fixes
Chores