New Components - chargify #14284
New Components - chargify #14284
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules to the Chargify component, including actions for creating and updating customers and subscriptions. Each action is defined with specific properties required for their respective operations. Additionally, new event sources for customer and subscription events are created, along with methods for managing webhooks. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
components/chargify/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (1)
12-20: LGTM: Methods are well-defined, with a minor suggestion.The methods are appropriately implemented:
getEventType()correctly returns "customer_create".getSummary(item)provides a clear summary of the new customer event.- Good use of method spreading from
common.methods.Consider adding error handling in
getSummaryto handle cases where the customer ID might be undefined:getSummary(item) { const customerId = item["payload[customer][id]"]; return customerId ? `New Customer with ID: ${customerId}` : "New Customer created (ID not available)"; },components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-instant/new-subscription-instant.mjs (2)
4-22: LGTM: Well-structured exported object with a minor suggestion.The exported object is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. It correctly extends the common base and includes necessary properties for the new subscription source. The use of "unique" for deduplication is appropriate.
Consider adding a brief comment above the exported object to describe its purpose and any important details about its usage.
17-19: LGTM: getSummary method is well-implemented, with a suggestion for improvement.The
getSummarymethod correctly generates an informative summary string with the subscription ID.Consider adding error handling to account for cases where the subscription ID might be undefined:
getSummary(item) { const subscriptionId = item["payload[subscription][id]"]; return subscriptionId ? `New Subscription with ID: ${subscriptionId}` : "New Subscription created"; },This change would make the method more robust against potential issues with the event payload structure.
components/chargify/actions/create-subscription/create-subscription.mjs (3)
3-8: LGTM: Action metadata is well-defined.The action metadata is comprehensive and follows best practices. The description is clear and includes a link to the API documentation, which is helpful for users.
Consider adding a brief example of when this action might be used to make the description even more user-friendly. For instance:
- description: "Establishes a new subscription for a given customer in Chargify. [See the documentation](https://developers.maxio.com/http/advanced-billing-api/api-endpoints/subscriptions/create-subscription)", + description: "Establishes a new subscription for a given customer in Chargify. Use this when you need to sign up a customer for a new product or service. [See the documentation](https://developers.maxio.com/http/advanced-billing-api/api-endpoints/subscriptions/create-subscription)",
9-41: LGTM: Props are well-defined and align with requirements.The props are correctly defined and use propDefinitions, which is a good practice for reusability. They align well with the requirements specified in the PR objectives.
Consider adding an optional
initialChargeInCentsprop to allow users to specify an initial charge amount when creating a subscription. This could be useful for setup fees or first-month prorations. Here's how you might add it:initialChargeInCents: { type: "integer", label: "Initial Charge (in cents)", description: "The amount (in cents) to charge when creating the subscription. Useful for setup fees or prorations.", optional: true, },Then, in the
runmethod, you can include this in the subscription object if it's provided:subscription: { // ... other properties initial_charge_in_cents: this.initialChargeInCents, },
42-57: LGTM: Run method is well-implemented.The run method correctly uses the Chargify API client to create a subscription. It properly constructs the subscription object from the provided props and handles the asynchronous nature of the API call. The summary export and full response return are good practices.
Consider adding error handling to provide more informative feedback to the user in case of API errors. Here's an example of how you could implement this:
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.chargify.createSubscription({ $, data: { subscription: { customer_id: this.customerId, product_id: this.productId, coupon_code: this.couponCode, next_billing_at: this.nextBillingAt, payment_collection_method: this.paymentCollectionMethod, }, }, }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created subscription with ID: ${response.id}`); return response; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create subscription: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }This will provide more context to the user if the API call fails, while still throwing the error for proper error handling in the Pipedream platform.
components/chargify/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (2)
9-80: Props definition looks comprehensive, with a minor suggestion.The props cover all necessary fields for creating a customer in Chargify, with appropriate use of optional fields. The descriptions and labels are clear and helpful.
Consider adding validation for the email field to ensure it's a valid email format. You can use a regular expression or a built-in email validation function if available in your framework.
81-103: Run method implementation looks good, with a suggestion for error handling.The run method correctly implements the customer creation process using the Chargify API. The data structure matches the API requirements, and the method properly exports a summary and returns the customer object.
Consider adding error handling to catch and handle potential API errors gracefully. For example:
async run({ $ }) { try { const { customer } = await this.chargify.createCustomer({ // ... existing code ... }); $.export("$summary", `Successfully created customer with ID ${customer.id}`); return customer; } catch (error) { $.export("$summary", `Failed to create customer: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }This will provide more informative error messages and ensure that the action fails properly if an error occurs.
components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-state-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
5-54: LGTM: Comprehensive subscription details provided.The subscription details are thorough and provide relevant information for a state change event. The structure aligns with the expected format for Chargify events.
Consider using
nullinstead of empty strings for fields with no value, as it more accurately represents the absence of data and can be easier to handle in some programming languages.components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-instant/test-event.mjs (1)
4-53: Subscription properties are comprehensive and well-structured.The subscription object contains all essential properties, including ID, state, timestamps, and financial details. The structure aligns with the Chargify API response format.
Consider using
nullinstead of empty strings for properties that don't have a value. This can improve type consistency and make it easier to distinguish between intentionally empty values and unset properties.components/chargify/chargify.app.mjs (2)
84-88: Use appropriate data type fornextBillingAtThe
nextBillingAtproperty represents a date/time value but is currently defined withtype: "string". Consider usingtype: "datetime"to provide better user experience with date pickers and ensure proper formatting.Apply the following change:
propDefinitions: { nextBillingAt: { - type: "string", + type: "datetime", label: "Next Billing At", description: "The next billing date in ISO-8601 format. Example: `2024-10-31T00:00:00Z`", optional: true, }, },
73-81: Provide user-friendly labels forpaymentCollectionMethodoptionsThe
paymentCollectionMethodoptions are currently raw string values. Enhancing them with descriptive labels improves clarity and user experience.Modify the
optionsarray to include labels:paymentCollectionMethod: { type: "string", label: "Payment Collection Method", description: "The type of payment collection to be used in the subscription", optional: true, - options: [ - "automatic", - "remittance", - "prepaid", - ], + options: [ + { label: "Automatic", value: "automatic" }, + { label: "Remittance", value: "remittance" }, + { label: "Prepaid", value: "prepaid" }, + ], },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- components/chargify/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/actions/create-subscription/create-subscription.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/actions/update-subscription/update-subscription.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/chargify.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-instant/new-subscription-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-state-instant/new-subscription-state-instant.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-state-instant/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/chargify/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (26)
components/chargify/sources/new-customer-instant/new-customer-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports from the common base and test event modules are suitable for this component's functionality.
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured component definition.The exported object is well-defined with appropriate properties:
- Reuses common functionality through spreading.
- Clearly specifies component metadata (key, name, description, etc.).
- Sets
dedupeto "unique", ensuring each new customer event is treated distinctly.- Includes
sampleEmitfor testing purposes.This structure aligns well with the component's purpose of handling new customer events.
Also applies to: 21-22
1-22: Great implementation of the New Customer (Instant) source component.This implementation successfully addresses the "new-customer" source requirement from the linked issue #13204. Key points:
- Properly structured component with clear metadata.
- Good code reuse through the common base.
- Appropriate event type and summary generation for new customer events.
- Consistent with the expected behavior of emitting an event when a new customer is added.
The component is well-implemented and ready for integration into the Chargify system.
components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-instant/new-subscription-instant.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow good practices.The imports from the common base module and the test event module are well-structured and promote code reuse.
14-16: LGTM: getEventType method is correctly implemented.The
getEventTypemethod appropriately returns "signup_success", which aligns with the expected event type for a new subscription.
1-22: Overall implementation is solid and aligns with PR objectives.The
new-subscription-instant.mjsmodule is well-implemented and fulfills the requirements for creating a new subscription source in Chargify. It correctly extends the common base, implements necessary methods, and provides appropriate event handling.Key strengths:
- Good code reuse through extending the common base.
- Clear and descriptive naming of properties and methods.
- Proper implementation of required functionality (getEventType and getSummary).
Minor suggestions for improvement have been provided in previous comments, but they don't detract from the overall quality of the implementation.
components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-state-instant/new-subscription-state-instant.mjs (4)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and use modern ES module syntax.The imports from the common base and sample event emitter are correctly structured and use the .mjs extension, indicating proper use of ES modules.
4-22: LGTM: Well-structured Pipedream component definition.The exported object follows the expected structure for a Pipedream component:
- Correctly extends the common base.
- Properly defines required properties like
key,name,description, etc.- Implements custom methods while preserving common ones.
- Includes
sampleEmitfor testing purposes.The component is well-organized and adheres to Pipedream's conventions.
14-16: LGTM:getEventTypemethod is correctly implemented.The
getEventTypemethod returns the appropriate event type "subscription_state_change", which aligns with the component's purpose of tracking subscription state changes.
1-22: Overall, well-implemented Chargify subscription state change source.This new component effectively implements a Pipedream source for Chargify subscription state changes. It adheres to Pipedream's component structure and conventions, and correctly implements the required methods for an instant source.
Key strengths:
- Proper use of the common base component.
- Clear and concise implementation of
getEventType.- Use of
dedupe: "unique"to prevent duplicate events.Areas for potential improvement:
- Enhance the robustness of the
getSummarymethod as suggested in the previous comment.The component aligns well with the PR objectives, providing the functionality to emit events when a subscription's state changes.
components/chargify/sources/new-customer-instant/test-event.mjs (2)
1-35: LGTM: Well-structured test event objectThe overall structure of the exported object is well-organized and comprehensive. It accurately represents a customer creation event from Chargify, which aligns with the PR objective of creating a new customer source.
2-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionSuggestions for improving property structure and data types
While the test event object is comprehensive, consider the following improvements:
- Nested Structure: Instead of using string keys like "payload[customer][id]", consider using a nested object structure. This would improve readability and ease of use:
export default { id: "2566241561", event: "customer_create", payload: { customer: { id: "83698432", first_name: "FirstName", // ... other customer properties }, site: { id: "87942", subdomain: "testing", }, }, event_id: "4833962613" }
- Boolean Values: Use actual boolean values instead of strings for boolean properties:
- "payload[customer]": "false", + "payload[customer]": false, - "payload[customer][tax_exempt]": "false", + "payload[customer][tax_exempt]": false,
- Date Format: Consider using ISO 8601 format for dates to ensure consistency and ease of parsing:
- "payload[customer][created_at]": "2024-10-11 15:12:51 -0400", + "payload[customer][created_at]": "2024-10-11T15:12:51-04:00", - "payload[customer][updated_at]": "2024-10-11 15:12:51 -0400", + "payload[customer][updated_at]": "2024-10-11T15:12:51-04:00",These changes would enhance the usability and consistency of the test event object.
components/chargify/actions/create-subscription/create-subscription.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly references the Chargify app module, which is essential for accessing the API client.
1-58: Overall, excellent implementation of the Create Subscription action.The code is well-structured, follows best practices, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. The action provides a clear interface for creating subscriptions in Chargify, with appropriate props and error handling.
A few minor suggestions have been made to further enhance the usability and robustness of the action:
- Adding a brief usage example to the description.
- Including an optional
initialChargeInCentsprop for more flexible subscription creation.- Implementing more informative error handling.
These suggestions are not critical and can be addressed in future iterations if desired. Great job on this implementation!
components/chargify/actions/create-customer/create-customer.mjs (2)
1-8: LGTM: Import and action metadata look good.The import statement and action metadata are well-defined. The inclusion of the API documentation link in the description is particularly helpful for users.
1-104: Overall, excellent implementation of the Chargify create customer action.This action is well-structured, comprehensive, and follows Pipedream best practices. It correctly implements the customer creation process using the Chargify API, with appropriate props and a clear run method.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive set of props covering all necessary customer fields.
- Clear and helpful descriptions for each prop.
- Proper structuring of data for the Chargify API call.
- Correct use of Pipedream's $ object for exporting summaries.
The minor suggestions for improvement (email validation and error handling) would further enhance the robustness and user-friendliness of this action.
Great job on this implementation!
components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-state-instant/test-event.mjs (4)
1-4: LGTM: Event metadata structure is appropriate.The event metadata is well-structured and includes essential information such as the event ID and type. The event type "subscription_state_change" correctly aligns with the file's purpose.
84-126: LGTM: Comprehensive product and product family details provided.The product details section is thorough and includes relevant information about the product associated with the subscription, including pricing, intervals, and product family details. This level of detail is valuable for understanding the context of the subscription state change.
55-83: LGTM: Detailed customer information provided.The customer details section is comprehensive and provides relevant information for the subscription state change event.
Reminder: Ensure that appropriate data privacy measures are in place when handling this event, as it contains sensitive customer information such as email addresses.
To verify the handling of sensitive data, you can run the following script:
127-130: LGTM: Site information is concise. Clarification needed on event_id.The site information provided is concise and sufficient for identifying the context of the event. However, there's an
event_idat the end of the object that seems redundant, as there's already anidat the beginning of the object (line 2).Could you clarify the purpose of having both
idandevent_id? If they serve different purposes, consider adding comments to explain their distinct roles. If they are indeed redundant, consider removing one of them for clarity.To verify the usage of these IDs, you can run the following script:
components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-instant/test-event.mjs (3)
1-3: LGTM: Event properties are correctly defined.The event ID and type are properly set at the top level of the object. The event type "signup_success" accurately represents a new subscription event.
126-132: LGTM: Remaining properties provide necessary context.The concluding properties of the object appropriately provide additional context about the subscription's relationships and the event's origin. This includes references to other entities and site-specific information, which are crucial for processing the event in a larger system.
Overall Review Summary:
The test event object is well-structured and provides a comprehensive representation of a new subscription event in Chargify. It includes detailed information about the subscription, customer, product, and associated entities. The main areas for improvement are:
- Consistency in data types, particularly for boolean values.
- Privacy considerations for test data, especially for personally identifiable information.
- Potential use of
nullinstead of empty strings for unset properties.These improvements will enhance the quality and reliability of the test event, making it more representative of real-world data and easier to work with in JavaScript environments.
55-83:⚠️ Potential issueCustomer properties are comprehensive, but consider data privacy and type consistency.
The customer object includes all necessary fields for identification and communication. However, there are a few points to consider:
Data Privacy: The test event contains an actual email address. For test data, it's better to use obviously fake data (e.g., "[email protected]").
Type Consistency: The "verified" field is set to "false" as a string. In JavaScript, it's more idiomatic to use a boolean value.
Consider applying these changes:
- "payload[subscription][customer][email]": "[email protected]", + "payload[subscription][customer][email]": "[email protected]", - "payload[subscription][customer]": "false", + "payload[subscription][customer]": false,Also, review other boolean fields in the object and ensure they are consistently represented as actual boolean values rather than strings.
components/chargify/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
14-26: Confirm parameters forcreateWebhookmethod inactivatehookIn the
activatehook, thecreateWebhookmethod is called with a nesteddataobject containing anendpoint. Please verify that this parameter structure aligns with the Chargify API's expectations. Using incorrect parameter names or structures might result in the webhook not being created successfully.To confirm the required parameters for
createWebhook, run the following script:
30-38: Verify parameters fordeleteWebhookmethod indeactivatehookIn the
deactivatehook, thedeleteWebhookmethod is called with bothhookIdanddatacontaining anendpointobject. Typically, deleting a webhook may only require thehookId. Passing unnecessary data might lead to unexpected behavior. Please verify if thedataparameter is necessary or if it can be omitted.To confirm the required parameters for
deleteWebhook, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Parameters for
deleteWebhookmethod are appropriate and necessary.After reviewing the
deleteWebhookmethod definition, it's clear that thedataparameter is utilized as part of the options (opts) passed to_makeRequest. Includingdatais necessary for properly configuring the webhook deletion.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of deleteWebhook method to verify required parameters. # Test: Search for the deleteWebhook method definition in chargify.app.mjs. Expect to see if `data` is a required parameter. rg --type js 'deleteWebhook' ../../chargify.app.mjs -A 10Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the correct chargify.app.mjs file and check the deleteWebhook method definition. # Step 1: Find the path to chargify.app.mjs fd 'chargify\.app\.mjs$' . --type file # Step 2: If found, search for the deleteWebhook method definition # Replace <found_path> with the actual path from Step 1 # Example: # rg --type js 'deleteWebhook' <found_path> -A 10Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the deleteWebhook method definition in chargify.app.mjs rg --type js 'deleteWebhook' ./components/chargify/chargify.app.mjs -A 10Length of output: 322
components/chargify/chargify.app.mjs (1)
129-138: Verify the correctness of theenableWebhooksmethodPlease ensure that the
enableWebhooksmethod is using the correct API endpoint, HTTP method, and request payload as per the Chargify API documentation. Confirm that enabling webhooks requires aPUTrequest to/webhooks/settings.jsonwith the specified data.To verify, you can check the Chargify API documentation for enabling webhooks to ensure the request is correctly implemented.
components/chargify/sources/new-subscription-state-instant/new-subscription-state-instant.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/chargify/actions/create-subscription/create-subscription.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
/approve |
Resolves #13204
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Enhancements
New Modules