Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Introduces JSON type to non-public env variables #757
feat: Introduces JSON type to non-public env variables #757
Changes from 1 commit
ba07cd2
4e77ee9
9ca5bab
7eeb075
47059a1
c51a844
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found no real benefit to the side-effects introduced by
dotenvExpand
, since there is explicitprocess.env
var assignment in the iteration of the values from the.env
files. If I'm mistaken, let me know, but leaving it in also conflicts with the ability to introduce this feature since it implicitly hydratesprocess.env
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Gathering my thought) the main idea with dotenvExpand is to have this:
And the reason we want that is to have the same behavior as nextjs and other frameworks with built-in env parsing.
Can we run the expansion at the end of this loop? (on the parsed object)?
Perhaps that might be best. I.e on line 72, we'd do:
That way, we can hydrate the key for the JSON value manually first, then expand once we know everything's in-place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah ok, that explanation makes more sense. I'll play around with it a bit more and make sure that still works
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I think my latest commit resolves this, but maybe you have some specific use cases you can test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Superb - works for me! Tested on some variant with the dnr as well!
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.