fix: Storage.prototype.remove and Storage.prototype.removeAll to handle namespace correctly

[shuntksh]

Details

fixes: #31

This PR addresses an issue in the @plasmo/storage where the remove method does not handle namespaces correctly. It also introduces new test cases that cover basic CRUD operations.

Changes:

• Updated the Storage class in the @plasmo/storage package to correctly handle namespaces when performing the remove operation.
• Added new test cases that utilize a modified mock to verify basic CRUD operations, ensuring proper functionality and increasing test coverage.

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
• I checked the current PR for duplication.

Contacts

• (OPTIONAL) Discord ID:

If your PR is accepted, we will award you with the Contributor role on Discord server.

To join the server, visit: https://www.plasmo.com/s/d

[louisgv]

@shuntksh is this PR good to go? Since it's in draft state I'm assumed you might wanted to add some more. Since we're moving the remove method into abstract, we will also need to add that to SecureStorage as well right

[shuntksh]

Hi @louisgv, I appreciate your input! I've added the remove method to SecureStorage and created a basic CRUD test to ensure any future changes will identify any inconsistencies in the implementation. And I published the PR for your review.

[louisgv]

Great finding! @shuntksh - I migrated the setup script to typescript so we can avoid those ts-ignore :D Thank you for your contribution.

[shuntksh]

Thanks, @louisgv for taking the time to review the change! TIL "mts" to write a setup file in TypeScript (with ts-jest)! Good to know!