explore strict mode compatibility for Greenwood website

[thescientist13]

Type of Change

• New Feature Request
• Documentation / Website
• Improvement / Suggestion
• Bug
• Other (please clarify below)

Summary

Related to the work done in #396 as part of #354 with the introduction of the optimization configuration option , would like to explore the feasibility of making the Greenwood website work using strict.

Details

The main consideration things that I can think of that would need to be addressed

1. The banner rotation rotation on the home page would need to be moved into inline <script> tags
2. The shelf sub nav would need to work without LitElement @click event handler
3. There are usages of custom elements being uses as CSS selectors which will not work

Maybe convert it to Lit+SSR with hydration for the progressive hydration for just the navigation?

---

That said, the above all make great criteria for proving the idea of Progressive Enhancement in that we only pass through userland code without the SPA bundling, but I'm also curious just to see what it would take, even if the PR doesn't get merged for strict mode in the Greenwood website. I guess it depends on what comes first. 😄

[thescientist13]

We're doing an overhaul of the website as part of #978 so can close this out.