Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(scan): proper indexes when seed is not supplied #5722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2020

Conversation

benlesh
Copy link
Member

@benlesh benlesh commented Sep 11, 2020

  • Smaller implementation
  • Improved docs
  • Adds comments
  • Adds a test
  • Fixes weird adjustment in reduce.

Size differences...

Before: 676 B

scan-before

After: 248 B (36% of original size)

scan-after

Documentation updates close a couple of issues:

Closes #4348
Closes #3879

- Smaller implementation
- Improved docs
- Adds comments
- Adds a test
- Fixes weird adjustment in `reduce`.

Closes ReactiveX#4348
Closes ReactiveX#3879
@benlesh
Copy link
Member Author

benlesh commented Sep 15, 2020

Closing in favor of #5729 (merged this into that PR)

@benlesh
Copy link
Member Author

benlesh commented Sep 21, 2020

blocked on #5729 (I'm not sure I merged that work in there, I'll have to double check when the dust settles.)

@benlesh benlesh merged commit 9c592f7 into ReactiveX:master Sep 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scan operator description might be confusing when not using any seed scan() definition
1 participant