Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing LGTM #144

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chayim
Copy link
Contributor

@chayim chayim commented Nov 27, 2022

The LGTM service is being shut off in two weeks. This pull request aims to remove all references to LGTM. Perhaps LGTM usage should be replaced with codeql, or a repository preferred tool, but IMHO that's the point of a different pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 82.74% // Head: 82.74% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (19ba00c) compared to base (e83b198).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #144   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.74%   82.74%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         591      591           
=======================================
  Hits          489      489           
  Misses         59       59           
  Partials       43       43           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link

@ankit-gautam23 ankit-gautam23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants