Fix scaling in (S/D)TGSNA, fix #103, thanks to @elivanova

[weslleyspereira]

Closes #103.

This PR addresses an old issue using the solution presented by @elivanova in #103 (comment).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (1fafb88) 0.00% compared to head (5c841b1) 0.00%.

❗ Current head 5c841b1 differs from pull request most recent head 5db45a2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5db45a2 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #830    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    0.00%    0.00%            
========================================
  Files        1908     1908            
  Lines      187072   186958   -114     
========================================
+ Misses     187072   186958   -114     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
SRC/cgbsvx.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgebal.f	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
SRC/cgees.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgeesx.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgeev.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgeevx.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgejsv.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgels.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgelsd.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
SRC/cgelss.f	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 242 more

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[martin-frbg]

Again, may I suggest editing the PR title to something like "Fix scaling in (S/D)TGSNA" instead of "Fix 103" ?

[langou]

Again, may I suggest editing the PR title to something like "Fix scaling in (S/D)TGSNA" instead of "Fix 103" ?

Done. Thanks for the suggestion.