Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maybe use control-mergebox instead of meteor-streams #1710

Closed
mitar opened this issue Dec 19, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Maybe use control-mergebox instead of meteor-streams #1710

mitar opened this issue Dec 19, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@mitar
Copy link
Contributor

mitar commented Dec 19, 2015

I made a package which allows one to disable Meteor's mergebox in publish functions, but keep all other functionality intact. I think it is cleaner and easier to use it then custom code around meteor-streams.

But, I have not tested it really much, so maybe it does not work as advertised. ;-)

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@engelgabriel
Copy link
Member

I like the idea. We are studying your package already :)

@Charuru
Copy link

Charuru commented Feb 21, 2016

Hows it going?

@engelgabriel
Copy link
Member

We liked the approach, but I haven't had time to implement and test it.

I believe this kind of ability to turn off the mergebox if coming to Meteor official release soon anyway.

@mitar
Copy link
Contributor Author

mitar commented Feb 22, 2016

I believe this kind of ability to turn off the mergebox if coming to Meteor official release soon anyway.

Not to my knowledge?

@engelgabriel
Copy link
Member

As they move to GraphQL, they said the reactivity all the way from the DB will become optional...

@mitar
Copy link
Contributor Author

mitar commented Feb 22, 2016

Oh, yes. But that will not be so soon? But yes. :-)

@mitar mitar closed this as completed Apr 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants