feat: Limit of members that can be added using the autojoin feature in a team's channel to the value of the API_Users_Limit setting

[Gustrb]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

There existed an implicit limit of 50 members that would be included whenever a a channel with auto join was created inside a team, this task ties the limit to the API_Users_Limit setting, so it is configurable.

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

This task requires a team with over 1000 members, so all of these members should be created and associated with the team

1. Create a channel from the team
2. Open the kebab-menu and mark the auto join box
   All the members should've been added correctly
3. Add one more user to the team
4. Create a new channel in the team
5. Mark the auto join box
   Now the new user should not have been added since there is a hard limit of 1000 members

Further comments

SUP-34

This PR is a copy of #31423
I created this one, because the other one was created from a fork which was causing a few problems such as weird conflicts

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4cbf36b

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 34 packages

Name	Type
@rocket.chat/meteor	Minor
@rocket.chat/i18n	Minor
@rocket.chat/mock-providers	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts	Major
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration	Major
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit	Major
@rocket.chat/ui-client	Major
@rocket.chat/gazzodown	Major
@rocket.chat/livechat	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar	Major
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf	Major
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings	Minor
@rocket.chat/rest-typings	Minor
@rocket.chat/apps	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/cron	Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/license	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence	Patch
rocketchat-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/models	Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[Gustrb]

This PR is a copy of #31423
I did this because the other PR was made from a fork and was causing a few issues since the develop branch was messed up

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 28.57143% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.41%. Comparing base (972ba42) to head (4cbf36b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #31859      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.42%   56.41%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files         2445     2450       +5     
  Lines        53932    54017      +85     
  Branches     11118    11134      +16     
===========================================
+ Hits         30432    30472      +40     
- Misses       20849    20885      +36     
- Partials      2651     2660       +9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	56.17% <28.57%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unit	71.84% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[MarcosSpessatto]

Is it possible to add tests to cover this feature?

We can use a small number for the setting to avoid creating too many users.

The ideal would be to test every case, with more and less members than the accepted, etc.

We can also add some UI tests to make sure the error is being displayed if the limit was exceeded.