fix: codeBlock styles in light mode

[juliajforesti]

SUP-583

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

codeBlock styles for dark mode were being applied for light mode too

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

SUP-583

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

• This PR is targeting the wrong base branch. It should target 6.10.0, but it targets 6.9.0

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 63d585e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 32 packages

Name	Type
@rocket.chat/meteor	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/apps	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/cron	Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit	Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown	Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat	Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts	Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/license	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence	Patch
rocketchat-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground	Patch
@rocket.chat/models	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf	Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration	Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.37%. Comparing base (bbb92fc) to head (63d585e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #32499      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    56.36%   56.37%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         2433     2435       +2     
  Lines        53702    53710       +8     
  Branches     11061    11062       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits         30267    30277      +10     
+ Misses       20787    20783       -4     
- Partials      2648     2650       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	56.08% <80.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit	72.21% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[MarcosSpessatto]

Can we add some UI tests to validate this? I don't know maybe to ensure a class to be applied?

[dougfabris]

LGTM!